The use of semi-scripted speech in a listening placement test for university students

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS
M. Clark
{"title":"The use of semi-scripted speech in a listening placement test for university students","authors":"M. Clark","doi":"10.58379/qflf1241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the feasibility of using semi-scripted spoken lectures as stimulus materials in a test of academic listening. The context for this study was the development of a revised test of academic listening designed to place enrolled university students into one of two levels of a language support course for non-native speakers. Because academic listening often involves listening to monologic speech such as lectures (Ferris & Tagg, 1996a), and because ‘authentic’ spoken language is qualitatively different to scripted speech (Biber et al., 2004), the revised test uses semi-scripted spoken mini-lectures as stimulus passages rather than relying on scripted material. Test questions were developed using only the informational elements that four model comprehenders, proficient English listeners (both native and non-native), were able to retain from a single hearing of the passages. Test data from 222 students were analysed using a Rasch methodology. Results show that this test development method did result in testable content that was appropriately targeted at the population of interest, though several aspects of the process could be improved. The paper concludes with some recommendations for using semi-scripted language in academic listening tests.","PeriodicalId":29650,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language Assessment","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58379/qflf1241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

This paper describes the feasibility of using semi-scripted spoken lectures as stimulus materials in a test of academic listening. The context for this study was the development of a revised test of academic listening designed to place enrolled university students into one of two levels of a language support course for non-native speakers. Because academic listening often involves listening to monologic speech such as lectures (Ferris & Tagg, 1996a), and because ‘authentic’ spoken language is qualitatively different to scripted speech (Biber et al., 2004), the revised test uses semi-scripted spoken mini-lectures as stimulus passages rather than relying on scripted material. Test questions were developed using only the informational elements that four model comprehenders, proficient English listeners (both native and non-native), were able to retain from a single hearing of the passages. Test data from 222 students were analysed using a Rasch methodology. Results show that this test development method did result in testable content that was appropriately targeted at the population of interest, though several aspects of the process could be improved. The paper concludes with some recommendations for using semi-scripted language in academic listening tests.
在大学生听力分班测试中使用半脚本演讲
本文描述了在学术听力测试中使用半脚本口语演讲作为刺激材料的可行性。本研究的背景是制定一项修订后的学术听力测试,旨在将入学的大学生分为两个级别,分别参加针对非母语人士的语言支持课程。因为学术听力通常涉及听单一的演讲,如讲座(Ferris & Tagg, 1996a),而且因为“真实的”口语在本质上不同于脚本演讲(Biber et al., 2004),修订后的测试使用半脚本的口语迷你讲座作为刺激段落,而不是依赖脚本材料。测试问题只使用四个模型理解者,精通英语的听众(母语和非母语)能够从一次听力中记住的信息元素来开发。使用Rasch方法分析了222名学生的测试数据。结果表明,这种测试开发方法确实产生了适当地针对感兴趣人群的可测试内容,尽管该过程的几个方面可以得到改进。文章最后对在学术听力测试中使用半脚本语言提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信