Computerized three-dimensional pedicle morphometry from computed tomography images of the thoracic spine

IF 0.8 4区 计算机科学 Q4 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
Dejan Knez, T. Vrtovec
{"title":"Computerized three-dimensional pedicle morphometry from computed tomography images of the thoracic spine","authors":"Dejan Knez, T. Vrtovec","doi":"10.5566/ias.2349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge of pedicle morphometry is valuable for a safe and reliable pedicle screw placement. In this study, we performed and evaluated computerized pedicle morphometry measurements from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of the thoracic spine from 26 subjects. Manual measurements of the pedicle width, height and chord length were obtained for 540 thoracic pedicles in selected cross sections of orthogonal and oblique multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs). Computerized measurements of the pedicle width, height, length, chord length, transverse angulation, sagittal angulation and cross-sectional area were obtained for the same pedicles by an automated method that is based on parametric modeling of vertebral structures in three dimensions (3D). Statistical analysis revealed that manual measurements from orthogonal MPRs were significantly different (p ≤ 0.0011) when compared to those from oblique MPRs and computerized measurement in 3D, with the respective mean absolute difference (MAD) ± standard deviation (SD) of 0.77 ± 0.56 mm and 0.74 ± 0.57 mm for the pedicle width, and 1.31 ± 1.08 mm and 1.45 ± 1.10 mm for the pedicle height. No statistically significant differences (p ≥ 0.12) were observed between manual measurements from oblique MPRs and computerized measurements in 3D, with MAD ± SD of 0.44 ± 0.35 mm, 0.56 ± 0.52 mm and 1.72 ± 1.29 mm for the pedicle width, height and chord length, respectively. The advantage of computerized measurements is that they allow the extraction of additional pedicle morphometric parameters, which are important for preoperative planning of pedicle screw placement, or can be used for population and demographic studies using larger pedicle databases.","PeriodicalId":49062,"journal":{"name":"Image Analysis & Stereology","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Image Analysis & Stereology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5566/ias.2349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Knowledge of pedicle morphometry is valuable for a safe and reliable pedicle screw placement. In this study, we performed and evaluated computerized pedicle morphometry measurements from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images of the thoracic spine from 26 subjects. Manual measurements of the pedicle width, height and chord length were obtained for 540 thoracic pedicles in selected cross sections of orthogonal and oblique multiplanar reconstructions (MPRs). Computerized measurements of the pedicle width, height, length, chord length, transverse angulation, sagittal angulation and cross-sectional area were obtained for the same pedicles by an automated method that is based on parametric modeling of vertebral structures in three dimensions (3D). Statistical analysis revealed that manual measurements from orthogonal MPRs were significantly different (p ≤ 0.0011) when compared to those from oblique MPRs and computerized measurement in 3D, with the respective mean absolute difference (MAD) ± standard deviation (SD) of 0.77 ± 0.56 mm and 0.74 ± 0.57 mm for the pedicle width, and 1.31 ± 1.08 mm and 1.45 ± 1.10 mm for the pedicle height. No statistically significant differences (p ≥ 0.12) were observed between manual measurements from oblique MPRs and computerized measurements in 3D, with MAD ± SD of 0.44 ± 0.35 mm, 0.56 ± 0.52 mm and 1.72 ± 1.29 mm for the pedicle width, height and chord length, respectively. The advantage of computerized measurements is that they allow the extraction of additional pedicle morphometric parameters, which are important for preoperative planning of pedicle screw placement, or can be used for population and demographic studies using larger pedicle databases.
胸椎计算机断层图像的计算机三维椎弓根形态测量
椎弓根形态测量学知识对于安全可靠地放置椎弓根螺钉是有价值的。在这项研究中,我们对26名受试者的胸椎术前计算机断层扫描(CT)图像进行了计算机椎弓根形态测量并进行了评估。在正交和斜向多平面重建(MPRs)的选定横截面上,人工测量540根胸椎弓根的宽度、高度和弦长。通过基于三维(3D)椎体结构参数化建模的自动化方法,计算机测量了相同椎弓根的宽度、高度、长度、弦长、横向成角、矢状成角和横截面积。统计分析显示,手工测量的正交MPRs与斜向MPRs和计算机三维测量的MPRs相比,差异有统计学意义(p≤0.0011),其中椎弓根宽度的平均绝对差(MAD)±标准差(SD)分别为0.77±0.56 mm和0.74±0.57 mm,椎弓根高度的平均绝对差(MAD)±标准差(SD)为1.31±1.08 mm和1.45±1.10 mm。手工斜向mpr测量与计算机三维测量无统计学差异(p≥0.12),椎弓根宽度、高度和弦长MAD±SD分别为0.44±0.35 mm、0.56±0.52 mm和1.72±1.29 mm。计算机化测量的优势在于可以提取额外的椎弓根形态测量参数,这些参数对于椎弓根螺钉置入的术前规划非常重要,或者可以使用更大的椎弓根数据库用于人口和人口统计学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Image Analysis & Stereology
Image Analysis & Stereology MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Image Analysis and Stereology is the official journal of the International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis. It promotes the exchange of scientific, technical, organizational and other information on the quantitative analysis of data having a geometrical structure, including stereology, differential geometry, image analysis, image processing, mathematical morphology, stochastic geometry, statistics, pattern recognition, and related topics. The fields of application are not restricted and range from biomedicine, materials sciences and physics to geology and geography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信