Logical attestation: an authorization architecture for trustworthy computing

E. G. Sirer, W. D. Bruijn, Patrick Reynolds, Alan Shieh, Kevin Walsh, Dan Williams, F. Schneider
{"title":"Logical attestation: an authorization architecture for trustworthy computing","authors":"E. G. Sirer, W. D. Bruijn, Patrick Reynolds, Alan Shieh, Kevin Walsh, Dan Williams, F. Schneider","doi":"10.1145/2043556.2043580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the design and implementation of a new operating system authorization architecture to support trustworthy computing. Called logical attestation, this architecture provides a sound framework for reasoning about run time behavior of applications. Logical attestation is based on attributable, unforgeable statements about program properties, expressed in a logic. These statements are suitable for mechanical processing, proof construction, and verification; they can serve as credentials, support authorization based on expressive authorization policies, and enable remote principals to trust software components without restricting the local user's choice of binary implementations. We have implemented logical attestation in a new operating system called the Nexus. The Nexus executes natively on x86 platforms equipped with secure coprocessors. It supports both native Linux applications and uses logical attestation to support new trustworthy-computing applications. When deployed on a trustworthy cloud-computing stack, logical attestation is efficient, achieves high-performance, and can run applications that provide qualitative guarantees not possible with existing modes of attestation.","PeriodicalId":20672,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"88","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Twenty-Third ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2043556.2043580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 88

Abstract

This paper describes the design and implementation of a new operating system authorization architecture to support trustworthy computing. Called logical attestation, this architecture provides a sound framework for reasoning about run time behavior of applications. Logical attestation is based on attributable, unforgeable statements about program properties, expressed in a logic. These statements are suitable for mechanical processing, proof construction, and verification; they can serve as credentials, support authorization based on expressive authorization policies, and enable remote principals to trust software components without restricting the local user's choice of binary implementations. We have implemented logical attestation in a new operating system called the Nexus. The Nexus executes natively on x86 platforms equipped with secure coprocessors. It supports both native Linux applications and uses logical attestation to support new trustworthy-computing applications. When deployed on a trustworthy cloud-computing stack, logical attestation is efficient, achieves high-performance, and can run applications that provide qualitative guarantees not possible with existing modes of attestation.
逻辑认证:用于可信计算的授权体系结构
本文描述了一种支持可信计算的新的操作系统授权体系结构的设计和实现。这种体系结构被称为逻辑认证,它为推断应用程序的运行时行为提供了一个可靠的框架。逻辑认证基于用逻辑表示的关于程序属性的可归属的、不可伪造的声明。这些表述适用于机械加工、证明施工、验证;它们可以用作凭证,支持基于表达性授权策略的授权,并使远程主体能够信任软件组件,而不限制本地用户对二进制实现的选择。我们在名为Nexus的新操作系统中实现了逻辑认证。Nexus在配备安全协处理器的x86平台上本地执行。它既支持本地Linux应用程序,又使用逻辑证明来支持新的可信计算应用程序。当部署在可信的云计算堆栈上时,逻辑认证是高效的,可以实现高性能,并且可以运行提供现有认证模式无法提供的定性保证的应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信