Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention in the right coronary artery on right ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction

GanthalaPaul Kiran, T. Santosh, Grace John, MSrinivasa Rao
{"title":"Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention in the right coronary artery on right ventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction","authors":"GanthalaPaul Kiran, T. Santosh, Grace John, MSrinivasa Rao","doi":"10.4103/jicc.jicc_16_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a potent predictor of mortality and morbidity after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Even though elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly decreased myocardial damage of the left ventricle; in literature, there has been a lack of information regarding the effect of PCI on RV function. Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the effect of the right coronary artery (RCA) revascularization on systolic and diastolic functions of the right ventricle following acute inferior wall MI (IWMI). Subjects and Methods: Fifty-nine patients diagnosed with acute IWMI following RCA revascularization were prospectively investigated between April 2018 and January 2020. Patients were subjected to two-dimensional echocardiography. RV systolic and diastolic functions were reported before and after the PCI procedure and compared using different echocardiographic RV systolic and diastolic parameters. Results: After PCI, echocardiographic RV systolic and diastolic functions were significantly improved in proximal and mid RCA in terms of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV fractional area change (RVFAC), and early RV filling velocity/late RV filling velocity (E/A). Significant improvement was found in mid RCA in terms of peak systolic (S') velocity (P = 0.008) and proximal RCA in terms of early RV filling velocity/early diastolic tricuspid annulus velocity (E/e') (P = 0.021). Overall echocardiographic systolic and diastolic parameters in patients with RV dysfunction following PCI were improved (TAPSE [37.29% vs. 81.82%], S' velocity [37.29% vs. 68.18%], RVFAC [33.90% vs. 90.00%], and E/A [33.90% vs. 75.00%]). Conclusions: Patients with RV dysfunction were remarkably improved after RCA revascularization. Hence, RCA revascularization can become an appropriate treatment alternative for the recovery of patients who suffer from RV dysfunction.","PeriodicalId":100789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian College of Cardiology","volume":"29 1","pages":"11 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jicc.jicc_16_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is a potent predictor of mortality and morbidity after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Even though elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly decreased myocardial damage of the left ventricle; in literature, there has been a lack of information regarding the effect of PCI on RV function. Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the effect of the right coronary artery (RCA) revascularization on systolic and diastolic functions of the right ventricle following acute inferior wall MI (IWMI). Subjects and Methods: Fifty-nine patients diagnosed with acute IWMI following RCA revascularization were prospectively investigated between April 2018 and January 2020. Patients were subjected to two-dimensional echocardiography. RV systolic and diastolic functions were reported before and after the PCI procedure and compared using different echocardiographic RV systolic and diastolic parameters. Results: After PCI, echocardiographic RV systolic and diastolic functions were significantly improved in proximal and mid RCA in terms of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV fractional area change (RVFAC), and early RV filling velocity/late RV filling velocity (E/A). Significant improvement was found in mid RCA in terms of peak systolic (S') velocity (P = 0.008) and proximal RCA in terms of early RV filling velocity/early diastolic tricuspid annulus velocity (E/e') (P = 0.021). Overall echocardiographic systolic and diastolic parameters in patients with RV dysfunction following PCI were improved (TAPSE [37.29% vs. 81.82%], S' velocity [37.29% vs. 68.18%], RVFAC [33.90% vs. 90.00%], and E/A [33.90% vs. 75.00%]). Conclusions: Patients with RV dysfunction were remarkably improved after RCA revascularization. Hence, RCA revascularization can become an appropriate treatment alternative for the recovery of patients who suffer from RV dysfunction.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对急性心肌梗死患者右心室功能的影响
背景:右心室功能障碍是急性心肌梗死(MI)后死亡率和发病率的有效预测因子。尽管选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)显著降低了左心室的心肌损伤;在文献中,缺乏关于PCI对RV功能影响的信息。目的:探讨急性下壁心肌梗死(IWMI)后右冠状动脉(RCA)血运重建术对右心室收缩和舒张功能的影响。对象和方法:在2018年4月至2020年1月期间,对59例经RCA血运重建术诊断为急性IWMI的患者进行前瞻性调查。患者接受二维超声心动图检查。报告PCI手术前后左室收缩和舒张功能,并使用不同的超声心动图右室收缩和舒张参数进行比较。结果:PCI术后,超声心动图右心室收缩和舒张功能在三尖瓣环面收缩偏移(TAPSE)、右心室分数面积改变(RVFAC)和早期右心室充盈速度/晚期右心室充盈速度(E/A)方面均显著改善。中期RCA在峰值收缩速度(S')方面有显著改善(P = 0.008),近端RCA在早期RV充盈速度/舒张早期三尖瓣环速度(E/ E ')方面有显著改善(P = 0.021)。左室功能障碍患者PCI术后超声心动图收缩期和舒张期总参数均有改善(TAPSE [37.29% vs. 81.82%], S' velocity [37.29% vs. 68.18%], RVFAC [33.90% vs. 90.00%], E/A [33.90% vs. 75.00%])。结论:RCA血运重建术后右心室功能障碍患者有明显改善。因此,RCA血运重建术可以成为右心室功能障碍患者康复的一种合适的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信