Demystifying use of septic tanks for waste water treatment in developing countries

Mufalo Nanyama, Erastus M. Mwanaumo, J. Tembo
{"title":"Demystifying use of septic tanks for waste water treatment in developing countries","authors":"Mufalo Nanyama, Erastus M. Mwanaumo, J. Tembo","doi":"10.53974/unza.jonas.5.1.711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The narrative that septic tanks are agents of ground water pollution, has contributed to the false negative responses that are experienced any time an installation of these tanks is undertaken. To demystify this narrative, it was imperative to explore different perspectives from social-cultural environment to technological one. The study used qualitative multiple case study approach, to review available published literature, surveys and experimental studies on septic tanks. To resolve the challenge of low sanitation coverage that may risk achievement of SDG 6.2, focus should shift from conventional centralised systems to onsite in this case septic tanks. Within the context of septic tanks, dome shaped digesters should be preferred because of structural integrity when tested for deformations, bending moments and shear forces under different combinations of loads. The social perspectives of pollution, caused by septic tanks, should not stand if baseline data on variables such as space, soil formation and strength of material are conducted. To avoid environmental contamination, areas designated for septic tanks should be delineated as such. An inventory of all septic tanks should be kept. Consultants and developers involved in selection of waste water treatment options, should avoid false negative response and focus on empirical results, after delineation. The research findings have indicated that dome shaped digesters as opposed to traditional rectangular septic tanks, should be adopted if developing countries are to improve sanitation coverage.","PeriodicalId":16473,"journal":{"name":"Journal of natural sciences, life and applied sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of natural sciences, life and applied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53974/unza.jonas.5.1.711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The narrative that septic tanks are agents of ground water pollution, has contributed to the false negative responses that are experienced any time an installation of these tanks is undertaken. To demystify this narrative, it was imperative to explore different perspectives from social-cultural environment to technological one. The study used qualitative multiple case study approach, to review available published literature, surveys and experimental studies on septic tanks. To resolve the challenge of low sanitation coverage that may risk achievement of SDG 6.2, focus should shift from conventional centralised systems to onsite in this case septic tanks. Within the context of septic tanks, dome shaped digesters should be preferred because of structural integrity when tested for deformations, bending moments and shear forces under different combinations of loads. The social perspectives of pollution, caused by septic tanks, should not stand if baseline data on variables such as space, soil formation and strength of material are conducted. To avoid environmental contamination, areas designated for septic tanks should be delineated as such. An inventory of all septic tanks should be kept. Consultants and developers involved in selection of waste water treatment options, should avoid false negative response and focus on empirical results, after delineation. The research findings have indicated that dome shaped digesters as opposed to traditional rectangular septic tanks, should be adopted if developing countries are to improve sanitation coverage.
揭露发展中国家使用化粪池处理废水的秘密
化粪池是造成地下水污染的因素的说法,造成了每次安装这些化粪池时所经历的错误否定反应。为了揭开这种叙事的神秘面纱,必须探索从社会文化环境到技术环境的不同视角。本研究采用定性的多案例研究方法,对已发表的有关化粪池的文献、调查和实验研究进行综述。为了解决可能危及实现可持续发展目标6.2的卫生设施覆盖率低的挑战,重点应从传统的集中式系统转移到现场化粪池。在化粪池的情况下,由于在不同荷载组合下进行变形、弯矩和剪切力测试时结构的完整性,应优先选择圆顶型消化池。如果进行诸如空间、土壤形成和材料强度等变量的基线数据,那么化粪池造成的污染的社会观点就不应该成立。为避免污染环境,应划定化粪池的指定区域。应保存所有化粪池的清单。参与选择废水处理方案的顾问和开发商应避免错误的负面反应,并将重点放在经验结果上。研究结果表明,如果发展中国家要改善卫生设施的覆盖率,就应该采用圆顶状的化粪池,而不是传统的矩形化粪池。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信