Food System Resilience: Concepts, Issues, and Challenges

IF 15.5 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
M. Zurek, John J. A. Ingram, A. Bellamy, C. Goold, Christopher Lyon, P. Alexander, A. Barnes, D. Bebber, T. Breeze, A. Bruce, Lisa M. Collins, Jessica A. C. Davies, Bob Doherty, J. Ensor, Sofia C. Franco, Andrea Gatto, T. Hess, C. Lamprinopoulou, Lingxuan Liu, M. Merkle, L. Norton, Tom Oliver, J. Ollerton, S. Potts, M. S. Reed, C. Sutcliffe, P. Withers
{"title":"Food System Resilience: Concepts, Issues, and Challenges","authors":"M. Zurek, John J. A. Ingram, A. Bellamy, C. Goold, Christopher Lyon, P. Alexander, A. Barnes, D. Bebber, T. Breeze, A. Bruce, Lisa M. Collins, Jessica A. C. Davies, Bob Doherty, J. Ensor, Sofia C. Franco, Andrea Gatto, T. Hess, C. Lamprinopoulou, Lingxuan Liu, M. Merkle, L. Norton, Tom Oliver, J. Ollerton, S. Potts, M. S. Reed, C. Sutcliffe, P. Withers","doi":"10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Food system resilience has multiple dimensions. We draw on food system and resilience concepts and review resilience framings of different communities. We present four questions to frame food system resilience (Resilience of what? Resilience to what? Resilience from whose perspective? Resilience for how long?) and three approaches to enhancing resilience (robustness, recovery, and reorientation—the three “Rs”). We focus on enhancing resilience of food system outcomes and argue this will require food system actors adapting their activities, noting that activities do not change spontaneously but in response to a change in drivers: an opportunity or a threat. However, operationalizing resilience enhancement involves normative choices and will result in decisions having to be negotiated about trade-offs among food system outcomes for different stakeholders. New approaches to including different food system actors’ perceptions and goals are needed to build food systems that are better positioned to address challenges of the future. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Volume 47 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.","PeriodicalId":7982,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Environment and Resources","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":15.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Environment and Resources","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-050744","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Food system resilience has multiple dimensions. We draw on food system and resilience concepts and review resilience framings of different communities. We present four questions to frame food system resilience (Resilience of what? Resilience to what? Resilience from whose perspective? Resilience for how long?) and three approaches to enhancing resilience (robustness, recovery, and reorientation—the three “Rs”). We focus on enhancing resilience of food system outcomes and argue this will require food system actors adapting their activities, noting that activities do not change spontaneously but in response to a change in drivers: an opportunity or a threat. However, operationalizing resilience enhancement involves normative choices and will result in decisions having to be negotiated about trade-offs among food system outcomes for different stakeholders. New approaches to including different food system actors’ perceptions and goals are needed to build food systems that are better positioned to address challenges of the future. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Volume 47 is October 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
粮食系统弹性:概念、问题和挑战
粮食系统恢复力具有多个维度。我们借鉴了食物系统和弹性概念,并回顾了不同社区的弹性框架。我们提出了四个问题来构建食物系统的弹性(什么弹性?适应什么?韧性是从谁的角度出发的?弹性能维持多久?)以及增强弹性的三种方法(稳健性、恢复性和重新定位——三个“r”)。我们的重点是提高粮食系统结果的弹性,并认为这将需要粮食系统行为者调整其活动,并指出活动不会自发改变,而是要对驱动因素的变化做出反应:机会或威胁。然而,实施增强抵御力涉及规范性选择,并将导致必须就不同利益攸关方的粮食系统结果之间的权衡进行决策谈判。要建立能够更好地应对未来挑战的粮食系统,需要采用新的方法,将不同粮食系统行为者的看法和目标纳入其中。《环境与资源年鉴》第47卷的最终在线出版日期预计为2022年10月。修订后的估计数请参阅http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual Review of Environment and Resources
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
1.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Environment and Resources, established in 1976, offers authoritative reviews on key environmental science and engineering topics. It covers various subjects, including ecology, conservation science, water and energy resources, atmosphere, oceans, climate change, agriculture, living resources, and the human dimensions of resource use and global change. The journal's recent transition from gated to open access through Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program, with all articles published under a CC BY license, enhances the dissemination of knowledge in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信