“You Still Believe Like a Jew!”: Polemical Comparisons and Other Eastern Christian Rhetoric Associating Muslims with Jews from the Seventh to Ninth Centuries
{"title":"“You Still Believe Like a Jew!”: Polemical Comparisons and Other Eastern Christian Rhetoric Associating Muslims with Jews from the Seventh to Ninth Centuries","authors":"David M. Freidenreich","doi":"10.46586/er.11.2022.9643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patriarch Timothy I and Theodore bar Koni, late eighth-century members of the Church of the East, brand Muslims as “new Jews,” in Timothy’s words, on account of their refusal to accept Christian doctrines about Christ. Like many other Eastern Christians, these authors employ the discourse of anti-Judaism against Muslim targets to reinforce the faith of their Christian audiences. Timothy and Theodore, however, are the only known authors of the initial Islamic centuries who employ the rhetorical device of polemical comparison when associating Muslims with Jews. Analysis of the elements with which Timothy and Theodore construct their comparisons reveals the goals that they hoped to achieve through their innovative use of traditional anti-Jewish discourse as well as the distinctive contributions of this rhetorical device to their arguments on behalf of Christian truth claims. This essay demonstrates a broadly applicable method for rhetorical analysis of polemical comparisons.","PeriodicalId":36421,"journal":{"name":"Entangled Religions","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entangled Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/er.11.2022.9643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Patriarch Timothy I and Theodore bar Koni, late eighth-century members of the Church of the East, brand Muslims as “new Jews,” in Timothy’s words, on account of their refusal to accept Christian doctrines about Christ. Like many other Eastern Christians, these authors employ the discourse of anti-Judaism against Muslim targets to reinforce the faith of their Christian audiences. Timothy and Theodore, however, are the only known authors of the initial Islamic centuries who employ the rhetorical device of polemical comparison when associating Muslims with Jews. Analysis of the elements with which Timothy and Theodore construct their comparisons reveals the goals that they hoped to achieve through their innovative use of traditional anti-Jewish discourse as well as the distinctive contributions of this rhetorical device to their arguments on behalf of Christian truth claims. This essay demonstrates a broadly applicable method for rhetorical analysis of polemical comparisons.
大牧首提摩太一世(Timothy I)和西奥多·巴尔·科尼(Theodore bar Koni)是八世纪后期东方教会的成员,用提摩太的话来说,他们把穆斯林称为“新犹太人”,因为他们拒绝接受基督教关于基督的教义。像许多其他东方基督徒一样,这些作者使用反犹太教的话语来反对穆斯林目标,以加强他们的基督徒读者的信仰。然而,提摩太和西奥多是最初的伊斯兰世纪中唯一已知的使用辩论比较的修辞手段将穆斯林与犹太人联系起来的作者。对提摩太和西奥多构建比较的要素的分析揭示了他们希望通过创新地使用传统的反犹太话语来达到的目标,以及这种修辞手段对他们代表基督教真理主张的论点的独特贡献。本文展示了一种广泛适用于辩论比较修辞分析的方法。