Role of Trust in AI-Driven Healthcare Systems: Discussion from the Perspective of Patient Safety

Mehmet Bilal Unver, Onur Asan
{"title":"Role of Trust in AI-Driven Healthcare Systems: Discussion from the Perspective of Patient Safety","authors":"Mehmet Bilal Unver, Onur Asan","doi":"10.1177/2327857922111026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of healthcare, enhancing patient safety depends on several factors (e.g., regulation, technology, care quality, physical environment, human factors) that are interconnected. Artificial Intelligence (AI), along with an increasing realm of use, functions as a component of the overall healthcare system from a multi-agent systems viewpoint. Far from a stand-alone agent, AI cannot be held liable for the flawed decisions in healthcare. Also, AI does not have the capacity to be trusted according to the most prevalent definitions of trust because it does not possess emotive states or cannot be held responsible for their actions. A positive experience of AI reliance come to be indicative of ‘trustworthiness’ rather than ‘trust’, implying further consequences related to the patient safety. From a multi-agent systems viewpoint, ‘trust’ requires all the environmental, psychological and technical conditions being responsive to patient safety. It is fertilized for the overall system in which ‘responsibility’, ‘accountability’, ‘privacy’, ‘transparency; and ‘fairness’ need to be secured for all the parties involved in AI-driven healthcare, given the ethical and legal concerns and their threat to the trust.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"61 1","pages":"129 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857922111026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the field of healthcare, enhancing patient safety depends on several factors (e.g., regulation, technology, care quality, physical environment, human factors) that are interconnected. Artificial Intelligence (AI), along with an increasing realm of use, functions as a component of the overall healthcare system from a multi-agent systems viewpoint. Far from a stand-alone agent, AI cannot be held liable for the flawed decisions in healthcare. Also, AI does not have the capacity to be trusted according to the most prevalent definitions of trust because it does not possess emotive states or cannot be held responsible for their actions. A positive experience of AI reliance come to be indicative of ‘trustworthiness’ rather than ‘trust’, implying further consequences related to the patient safety. From a multi-agent systems viewpoint, ‘trust’ requires all the environmental, psychological and technical conditions being responsive to patient safety. It is fertilized for the overall system in which ‘responsibility’, ‘accountability’, ‘privacy’, ‘transparency; and ‘fairness’ need to be secured for all the parties involved in AI-driven healthcare, given the ethical and legal concerns and their threat to the trust.
信任在人工智能驱动的医疗系统中的作用:从患者安全的角度讨论
在医疗保健领域,提高患者安全取决于几个相互关联的因素(例如,法规、技术、护理质量、物理环境、人为因素)。从多代理系统的角度来看,人工智能(AI)随着使用领域的增加,作为整个医疗保健系统的一个组成部分发挥作用。人工智能远不是一个独立的代理,它不能对医疗保健领域的错误决策负责。此外,根据最流行的信任定义,人工智能没有被信任的能力,因为它没有情绪状态,也不能对它们的行为负责。对人工智能的积极依赖表明了“可信赖性”而不是“信任”,这意味着与患者安全相关的进一步后果。从多主体系统的角度来看,“信任”要求所有环境、心理和技术条件都对患者安全作出反应。在整个系统中,“责任”、“问责制”、“隐私”、“透明度”;考虑到道德和法律问题以及它们对信任的威胁,人工智能驱动的医疗保健的所有相关方都需要确保“公平”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信