Viewpoint: acknowledging trauma in academic research

Itzel San Roman Pineda, Hattie Lowe, Laura J. Brown, J. Mannell
{"title":"Viewpoint: acknowledging trauma in academic research","authors":"Itzel San Roman Pineda, Hattie Lowe, Laura J. Brown, J. Mannell","doi":"10.1080/0966369X.2022.2159335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article contributes to current discussions about researcher trauma and encourages academic institutions to implement the systems of support that are required to make research work psychologically safe. Currently, conversations of research-related trauma have not produced institutional changes in academia due to a dominant masculinist rationale that sees research as an emotionless job aimed at achieving an objective account of reality. However, we argue that recognition of the emotions felt while doing research can improve the wellbeing of researchers, inform findings, and enrich overall scholarship. We call for academic institutions to allocate the necessary resources to further research on research-related trauma across disciplines and methods and to set in place systems of support centred on an ethics of care to help prevent, address and overcome researcher trauma.","PeriodicalId":12513,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Place & Culture","volume":"6 1","pages":"1184 - 1192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Place & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2159335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article contributes to current discussions about researcher trauma and encourages academic institutions to implement the systems of support that are required to make research work psychologically safe. Currently, conversations of research-related trauma have not produced institutional changes in academia due to a dominant masculinist rationale that sees research as an emotionless job aimed at achieving an objective account of reality. However, we argue that recognition of the emotions felt while doing research can improve the wellbeing of researchers, inform findings, and enrich overall scholarship. We call for academic institutions to allocate the necessary resources to further research on research-related trauma across disciplines and methods and to set in place systems of support centred on an ethics of care to help prevent, address and overcome researcher trauma.
观点:承认学术研究中的创伤
这篇文章有助于当前关于研究者创伤的讨论,并鼓励学术机构实施使研究工作心理安全所需的支持系统。目前,与研究相关的创伤对话并没有在学术界产生制度上的变化,因为占主导地位的男性主义理论认为,研究是一项没有情感的工作,旨在实现对现实的客观描述。然而,我们认为,在进行研究时,对所感受到的情绪的认识可以提高研究人员的幸福感,为研究结果提供信息,并丰富整体学术。我们呼吁学术机构分配必要的资源,以跨学科和方法进一步研究与研究相关的创伤,并建立以护理伦理为中心的支持系统,以帮助预防、解决和克服研究人员的创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信