Finding the Optimal Horizontal Well Trajectory using Monte Carlo Techniques: Implementation Details and Case Study in Abu Dhabi, UAE

Elkin Arroyo Negrete, Steve Webb, J. Rodriguez, A. Mavromatidis, Ahmed Yahya Al Blooshi, M. Basioni
{"title":"Finding the Optimal Horizontal Well Trajectory using Monte Carlo Techniques: Implementation Details and Case Study in Abu Dhabi, UAE","authors":"Elkin Arroyo Negrete, Steve Webb, J. Rodriguez, A. Mavromatidis, Ahmed Yahya Al Blooshi, M. Basioni","doi":"10.2118/192630-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Optimal field development plans are often required to maximize reservoir recovery while keeping costs low. This paper discuss the details of how to select the optimal horizontal well trajectory that maximizes reservoir recovery for an interbedded thinly layered carbonate reservoir. The case study here was applied to one of the largest wet gas / gas condensate fields in the UAE. The development plan targets four different reservoirs using horizontal wells. Each reservoir has different rock qualities, and the top reservoir is not in communication with the three reservoirs below.\n Each reservoir contains 3-4 sub-layers with varying reservoir properties. Some of the sub-layers may not be in communication with the others, and the vertical communication could be poor. In order to maximize recovery, the development plan calls for placing the horizontal wells crossing from one sub-layer to another sub-layer. The problem is in deciding how long the horizontal well should stay in each sub-layer. Since there are four reservoirs and an average of three sub-layers per reservoir, there are twelve possible lateral placement options that control the well trajectory and length. The methodology presented in this paper utilizes Monte Carlo sampling to calculate the well trajectory that maximizes recovery. The methodology resembles the ideas of the Metropolis Algorithm used in the Marko Chain Monte Carlo. The starting point uses an arbitrary well trajectory. This well trajectory is run in the simulator, and the cumulative production is saved as a reference. Subsequently, the same distribution is sampled and the simulator is run again. If the resulting recovery is greater than the initial recovery or the recovery from any prior iteration step, then the newly found well trajectory is used as the new mean of the distribution, and the steps are repeated until simulated field recovery does not substantially increase.","PeriodicalId":11014,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 12, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/192630-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimal field development plans are often required to maximize reservoir recovery while keeping costs low. This paper discuss the details of how to select the optimal horizontal well trajectory that maximizes reservoir recovery for an interbedded thinly layered carbonate reservoir. The case study here was applied to one of the largest wet gas / gas condensate fields in the UAE. The development plan targets four different reservoirs using horizontal wells. Each reservoir has different rock qualities, and the top reservoir is not in communication with the three reservoirs below. Each reservoir contains 3-4 sub-layers with varying reservoir properties. Some of the sub-layers may not be in communication with the others, and the vertical communication could be poor. In order to maximize recovery, the development plan calls for placing the horizontal wells crossing from one sub-layer to another sub-layer. The problem is in deciding how long the horizontal well should stay in each sub-layer. Since there are four reservoirs and an average of three sub-layers per reservoir, there are twelve possible lateral placement options that control the well trajectory and length. The methodology presented in this paper utilizes Monte Carlo sampling to calculate the well trajectory that maximizes recovery. The methodology resembles the ideas of the Metropolis Algorithm used in the Marko Chain Monte Carlo. The starting point uses an arbitrary well trajectory. This well trajectory is run in the simulator, and the cumulative production is saved as a reference. Subsequently, the same distribution is sampled and the simulator is run again. If the resulting recovery is greater than the initial recovery or the recovery from any prior iteration step, then the newly found well trajectory is used as the new mean of the distribution, and the steps are repeated until simulated field recovery does not substantially increase.
利用蒙特卡罗技术寻找最佳水平井轨迹:在阿联酋阿布扎比的实施细节和案例研究
最佳的油田开发计划通常需要在保持低成本的同时最大限度地提高油藏采收率。本文详细讨论了薄层互层碳酸盐岩储层如何选择最佳水平井轨迹,使油藏采收率最大化。本案例研究应用于阿联酋最大的湿气/凝析气田之一。该开发计划针对四个不同的储层,采用水平井。每个储层的岩石质量不同,顶部储层与下面三个储层不相通。每个储层包含3-4个具有不同储层性质的子层。一些子层可能不与其他子层通信,并且垂直通信可能很差。为了最大限度地提高采收率,开发计划要求水平井从一个子层穿过到另一个子层。问题在于决定水平井在每个子层中应该停留多长时间。由于有4个储层,每个储层平均有3个子层,因此有12种可能的横向布置方案来控制井眼轨迹和井长。本文提出的方法利用蒙特卡罗采样来计算最大化采收率的井眼轨迹。该方法类似于在马尔科链蒙特卡洛中使用的Metropolis算法的思想。起点使用任意井眼轨迹。该井轨迹在模拟器中运行,并将累积产量保存为参考。随后,对相同的分布进行采样,并再次运行模拟器。如果最终采收率大于初始采收率或之前任何迭代步骤的采收率,则将新发现的井眼轨迹作为分布的新平均值,并重复这些步骤,直到模拟现场采收率没有大幅增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信