Emergency department utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic

Regina K. Saylor, Andrea Blome, D. Isenberg, Daniel A. DelPortal, W. Satz, Kraftin E Schreyer
{"title":"Emergency department utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Regina K. Saylor, Andrea Blome, D. Isenberg, Daniel A. DelPortal, W. Satz, Kraftin E Schreyer","doi":"10.5430/jha.v9n6p25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Optimizing resource utilization is critical to reducing healthcare costs. Our study aims to review trends in overall patient volume, acuity, time of presentation, and use of resources in the emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: We compared ED utilization from a 30-day period during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 1, 2020-April 30, 2020) to the same 30-day period in the preceding calendar year (April 1, 2019-April 30-2019). Data were grouped into outcome measures focusing on ED throughput and utilization of ancillary ED services.Results: While the absolute number of patients in or arriving to the ED at any given time was significantly lower during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < .01), the hourly patterns of patient census, arrivals, and admissions all aligned with pre-pandemic values. Also, patient acuity, as measured by ESI level, did not significantly change. The absolute number of admissions for bothsites was similar to the pre-pandemic time period, but the percentage of patients admitted over the 30-day period increased. The absolute number of radiographic and laboratory studies ordered in the ED also changed significantly (p < .05), but the hourly pattern did not.Conclusions: Our study shows significantly lower patient volumes, increased admission rates, and no significant change in the hourly throughput of the ED. Thus, our analysis suggests that shift times should not be adjusted, nor should the number or composition of providers on each shift in academic and community ED sites during the COVID national lockdown.","PeriodicalId":15872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Administration","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jha.v9n6p25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Optimizing resource utilization is critical to reducing healthcare costs. Our study aims to review trends in overall patient volume, acuity, time of presentation, and use of resources in the emergency department (ED) during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: We compared ED utilization from a 30-day period during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 1, 2020-April 30, 2020) to the same 30-day period in the preceding calendar year (April 1, 2019-April 30-2019). Data were grouped into outcome measures focusing on ED throughput and utilization of ancillary ED services.Results: While the absolute number of patients in or arriving to the ED at any given time was significantly lower during the COVID-19 pandemic (p < .01), the hourly patterns of patient census, arrivals, and admissions all aligned with pre-pandemic values. Also, patient acuity, as measured by ESI level, did not significantly change. The absolute number of admissions for bothsites was similar to the pre-pandemic time period, but the percentage of patients admitted over the 30-day period increased. The absolute number of radiographic and laboratory studies ordered in the ED also changed significantly (p < .05), but the hourly pattern did not.Conclusions: Our study shows significantly lower patient volumes, increased admission rates, and no significant change in the hourly throughput of the ED. Thus, our analysis suggests that shift times should not be adjusted, nor should the number or composition of providers on each shift in academic and community ED sites during the COVID national lockdown.
COVID-19大流行期间急诊科的使用率
目的:优化资源利用是降低医疗成本的关键。我们的研究旨在回顾2019冠状病毒病大流行期间急诊科(ED)的总体患者数量、敏锐度、就诊时间和资源使用趋势。方法:将2019冠状病毒病大流行高峰期30天(2020年4月1日至2020年4月30日)与前一个日历年同期30天(2019年4月1日至2019年4月30日)的ED使用率进行比较。数据被分组为关注ED吞吐量和辅助ED服务利用率的结果测量。结果:虽然在COVID-19大流行期间,在任何给定时间进入或到达急诊科的患者绝对数量显着降低(p < 0.01),但患者普查、到达和入院的小时模式均与大流行前的值一致。此外,以ESI水平测量的患者敏锐度没有明显变化。这两个地点的绝对入院人数与大流行前时期相似,但在30天期间入院的患者百分比有所增加。急诊科的x线摄影和实验室检查的绝对数量也有显著变化(p < 0.05),但每小时的模式没有变化。结论:我们的研究表明,患者数量明显减少,入院率增加,急诊科每小时吞吐量没有显著变化。因此,我们的分析表明,在COVID国家封锁期间,不应调整轮班时间,也不应调整学术和社区急诊科每个班次的提供者数量或组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信