LESSONS FROM THE MARSHALL PLAN: GAINING PUBLIC SUPPORT, PREREQUISITES FOR SUCCESS, AND KEY EMPHASES FOR UKRAINE

IF 0.7 Q4 ECONOMICS
O. Nestor
{"title":"LESSONS FROM THE MARSHALL PLAN: GAINING PUBLIC SUPPORT, PREREQUISITES FOR SUCCESS, AND KEY EMPHASES FOR UKRAINE","authors":"O. Nestor","doi":"10.15407/econlaw.2023.02.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the peculiarities of the Marshall Plan or the European Recovery Program after World War II. In particular, three phases of the Marshall Plan are described (the first one began two years after the end of World War II and was characterized by the threatening situation in Europe; the second phase began when the process of European economic recovery approached the pre-war 1938 level and was characterized by concerns about the sustainability of these achievements, their maintenance, and improvement; the third phase began with the war on the Korean Peninsula and was marked by a gradual change in the Marshall Plan's course towards international security and defense). The propaganda aspect of the Marshall Plan and the process of its development are outlined. The article analyzes the prerequisites for the success of the Marshall Plan, which include the following: personnel and selection policy; organizational structure of the ECA; institutional prerequisites; psychological aspect; attention to detail: approach to foreign policy making, decisionmaking process, problem-solving method; management style. The article emphasizes that the idea that economics, politics, and psychology are inseparable in the process of creating support and rebuilding other countries was an important feature and basis for the development and implementation of the Marshall Plan. The author identifies the unique features of the Ukrainian context to be taken into account in the process of developing a “Marshall Plan for Ukraine” for its recovery after the Russian-Ukrainian war, in particular, the geopolitical aspect and the importance of geopolitical support from Ukraine's partners, as well as the need to restructure the Ukrainian economy in a modern way. The article argues that the lessons of the Marshall Plan for Western Europe can and should be used in the development of the “Marshall Plan for Ukraine”. The situation with the creation of an analog of the Marshall Plan for Ukraine will have its own unique specifics, as the recipient of assistance will be one country, and the circle of donors will be wider. Mutually beneficial partnership and respect between the recipient and donors, as well as the optimal organizational and management structure of the organization that will be involved in the reconstruction of Ukraine, are important.","PeriodicalId":51956,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomia i Prawo-Economics and Law","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomia i Prawo-Economics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2023.02.071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reveals the peculiarities of the Marshall Plan or the European Recovery Program after World War II. In particular, three phases of the Marshall Plan are described (the first one began two years after the end of World War II and was characterized by the threatening situation in Europe; the second phase began when the process of European economic recovery approached the pre-war 1938 level and was characterized by concerns about the sustainability of these achievements, their maintenance, and improvement; the third phase began with the war on the Korean Peninsula and was marked by a gradual change in the Marshall Plan's course towards international security and defense). The propaganda aspect of the Marshall Plan and the process of its development are outlined. The article analyzes the prerequisites for the success of the Marshall Plan, which include the following: personnel and selection policy; organizational structure of the ECA; institutional prerequisites; psychological aspect; attention to detail: approach to foreign policy making, decisionmaking process, problem-solving method; management style. The article emphasizes that the idea that economics, politics, and psychology are inseparable in the process of creating support and rebuilding other countries was an important feature and basis for the development and implementation of the Marshall Plan. The author identifies the unique features of the Ukrainian context to be taken into account in the process of developing a “Marshall Plan for Ukraine” for its recovery after the Russian-Ukrainian war, in particular, the geopolitical aspect and the importance of geopolitical support from Ukraine's partners, as well as the need to restructure the Ukrainian economy in a modern way. The article argues that the lessons of the Marshall Plan for Western Europe can and should be used in the development of the “Marshall Plan for Ukraine”. The situation with the creation of an analog of the Marshall Plan for Ukraine will have its own unique specifics, as the recipient of assistance will be one country, and the circle of donors will be wider. Mutually beneficial partnership and respect between the recipient and donors, as well as the optimal organizational and management structure of the organization that will be involved in the reconstruction of Ukraine, are important.
马歇尔计划的教训:获得公众支持、成功的先决条件以及乌克兰的重点
这篇文章揭示了二战后马歇尔计划或欧洲复苏计划的特点。特别地,马歇尔计划被描述为三个阶段(第一个阶段开始于第二次世界大战结束两年后,其特点是欧洲的威胁局势;第二阶段开始于欧洲经济复苏进程接近1938年战前水平,其特点是对这些成就的可持续性、维持和改善的担忧;第三阶段从朝鲜半岛战争开始,标志着马歇尔计划逐渐转向国际安全和防务。概述了马歇尔计划的宣传方面及其发展过程。文章分析了马歇尔计划成功的先决条件,包括:人员和选拔政策;非洲经委会的组织结构;制度的先决条件;心理方面;注重细节:外交政策制定的方法、决策过程、解决问题的方法;管理风格。文章强调,在创造支持和重建其他国家的过程中,经济、政治和心理是不可分割的,这是马歇尔计划制定和实施的重要特征和基础。作者指出,在为乌克兰在俄乌战争后的复苏制定“乌克兰马歇尔计划”的过程中,应考虑到乌克兰背景的独特性,特别是地缘政治方面和乌克兰伙伴地缘政治支持的重要性,以及以现代方式重组乌克兰经济的必要性。本文认为,西欧马歇尔计划的教训可以而且应该用于“乌克兰马歇尔计划”的制定。为乌克兰制定类似马歇尔计划的情况将有其独特的具体情况,因为援助的受援国将是一个国家,捐助国的范围将更广。受援国和援助国之间的互利伙伴关系和相互尊重,以及将参与乌克兰重建的组织的最佳组织和管理结构都是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书