Y. Shelygin, S. Achkasov, I. Reshetov, I. V. Mayev, O. Drapkina, E. Belousova, A. Vardanyan, B. Nanaeva, D. Abdulganieva, L. Adamyan, L. Namazova-Baranova, A. Razumovsky, A. Revishvili, I. Khatkov, A. Shabunin, M. Livzan, A. Sazhin, V. M. Timerbulatov, O. Khlynova, S. Yatsyk, R. Abdulkhakov, O. P. Alekseeva, S. Alekseenko, I. Bakulin, O. Barysheva, D. A. Blagovestnov, K. Bolikhov, V. Veselov, Y. Vinogradov, O. Golovenko, I. Gubonina, A. Gulyaev, A. Dolgushina, E. Dyakonova, T. Zhigalova, O. Karpukhin, O. Knyazev, N. V. Kostenko, I. D. Loranskaya, A. Moskalev, A. Odintsova, V. V. Omelyanovsky, M. Osipenko, V. Pavlenko, E. Poluektova, D. Popov, G. Rodoman, A. Segal, S. Sitkin, M. I. Skalinskaya, A. Surkov, L. V. Tarasova, Y. B. Uspenskaya, S. Frolov, E. Chashkova, S. Shapovalyants, O. Shifrin, O. Shcherbakova, O. Shchukina, T. Shkurko, I. Nazarov, A. Mingazov
{"title":"Consensus on controversial issues of the surgery for Crohn’s disease by Delphi method","authors":"Y. Shelygin, S. Achkasov, I. Reshetov, I. V. Mayev, O. Drapkina, E. Belousova, A. Vardanyan, B. Nanaeva, D. Abdulganieva, L. Adamyan, L. Namazova-Baranova, A. Razumovsky, A. Revishvili, I. Khatkov, A. Shabunin, M. Livzan, A. Sazhin, V. M. Timerbulatov, O. Khlynova, S. Yatsyk, R. Abdulkhakov, O. P. Alekseeva, S. Alekseenko, I. Bakulin, O. Barysheva, D. A. Blagovestnov, K. Bolikhov, V. Veselov, Y. Vinogradov, O. Golovenko, I. Gubonina, A. Gulyaev, A. Dolgushina, E. Dyakonova, T. Zhigalova, O. Karpukhin, O. Knyazev, N. V. Kostenko, I. D. Loranskaya, A. Moskalev, A. Odintsova, V. V. Omelyanovsky, M. Osipenko, V. Pavlenko, E. Poluektova, D. Popov, G. Rodoman, A. Segal, S. Sitkin, M. I. Skalinskaya, A. Surkov, L. V. Tarasova, Y. B. Uspenskaya, S. Frolov, E. Chashkova, S. Shapovalyants, O. Shifrin, O. Shcherbakova, O. Shchukina, T. Shkurko, I. Nazarov, A. Mingazov","doi":"10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-172-183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM: to establish the consensus on controversial issues of the surgery for Сrohn’s disease by Delphi method.METHODS: a cross-sectional study was conducted by the Delphi method. 62 experts voted intramural and anonymous (31.03.23). 5 statements from the current edition of clinical guidelines were selected for correction by working group and further voting [2]. Based on the practical experience of the working group and literature data, 3 new statements were created also. Statements that do not reach the required level of agreement (80% or more) will be subjected to Round 2 of the Delphi method.RESULTS: all experts took part in the anonymous voting. The panel of experts is represented by 8 different areas of practical medicine and the median of the professional experience of the respondents was 30 (12–49) years. Of the 8 statements submitted for voting, consensus (80% or more) was reached on 6 out of 8. 2 statements have been revised by working group for the distance 2nd round of the Delphi study. Consensus (more than 80%) was reached on both.CONCLUSION: a cross-sectional study by the Delphi method provided the opinions of a panel of experts on controversial issues in the surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease. Statements that reach consensus will be included by the working group in a new edition of clinical guidelines of Crohn’s disease.","PeriodicalId":17840,"journal":{"name":"Koloproktologia","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koloproktologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2023-22-2-172-183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
AIM: to establish the consensus on controversial issues of the surgery for Сrohn’s disease by Delphi method.METHODS: a cross-sectional study was conducted by the Delphi method. 62 experts voted intramural and anonymous (31.03.23). 5 statements from the current edition of clinical guidelines were selected for correction by working group and further voting [2]. Based on the practical experience of the working group and literature data, 3 new statements were created also. Statements that do not reach the required level of agreement (80% or more) will be subjected to Round 2 of the Delphi method.RESULTS: all experts took part in the anonymous voting. The panel of experts is represented by 8 different areas of practical medicine and the median of the professional experience of the respondents was 30 (12–49) years. Of the 8 statements submitted for voting, consensus (80% or more) was reached on 6 out of 8. 2 statements have been revised by working group for the distance 2nd round of the Delphi study. Consensus (more than 80%) was reached on both.CONCLUSION: a cross-sectional study by the Delphi method provided the opinions of a panel of experts on controversial issues in the surgical treatment of Crohn’s disease. Statements that reach consensus will be included by the working group in a new edition of clinical guidelines of Crohn’s disease.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
