Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medical Students and Students’ Perspectives on COVID-19 Policies and Social Media in 2021 and 2022

Ghazal Becker, Alexis M. Stoner, Emily K. Ranta, Riddhi Shah, Victoria Reyes, H. Sutphin, El Instituto, Tecnológico de, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Medical Students and Students’ Perspectives on COVID-19 Policies and Social Media in 2021 and 2022","authors":"Ghazal Becker, Alexis M. Stoner, Emily K. Ranta, Riddhi Shah, Victoria Reyes, H. Sutphin, El Instituto, Tecnológico de, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic","doi":"10.5195/ijms.2023.2061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected medical students in several ways in 2021 and 2022. In continuation of a previous study, this study sought to determine how the changing nature of the pandemic affected medical students’ knowledge, experiences, perspectives on the policies and resources in 2022 compared to 2021.\nMethods: A qualitative study was conducted via open-ended journaling in 2021 and 2022. Participants were recruited from medical students in the U.S. as well as in Central America and the Caribbean, who were enrolled in a “Global Seminar for Health and Environment”.\nResults: A total of 142 and 72 responses were obtained in 2021 and 2022 respectively. Regarding the COVID-19 policies, U.S. students were thankful for vaccinations and approved of initiatives in their regions in 2021. Later, they were equally divided regarding region-specific pandemic policies. International students mainly approved of the policies in both years. Students consistently noted negative mental health impacts and difficulty with social limitations. U.S. students noted decreased academic opportunities in both years while international students noted family concerns in 2021. U.S. students held negative views about social media due to fearmongering in 2021 and politicization in 2022. International students held neutral and/or positive views about social media. U.S. students relied on the CDC as a source of information while international students utilized the WHO.\nConclusion: U.S. students had a more negative outlook as the pandemic progressed. It is difficult to draw comparisons within the international cohort due to limited responses obtained in 2022","PeriodicalId":73459,"journal":{"name":"International journal of medical students","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of medical students","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2023.2061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected medical students in several ways in 2021 and 2022. In continuation of a previous study, this study sought to determine how the changing nature of the pandemic affected medical students’ knowledge, experiences, perspectives on the policies and resources in 2022 compared to 2021. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted via open-ended journaling in 2021 and 2022. Participants were recruited from medical students in the U.S. as well as in Central America and the Caribbean, who were enrolled in a “Global Seminar for Health and Environment”. Results: A total of 142 and 72 responses were obtained in 2021 and 2022 respectively. Regarding the COVID-19 policies, U.S. students were thankful for vaccinations and approved of initiatives in their regions in 2021. Later, they were equally divided regarding region-specific pandemic policies. International students mainly approved of the policies in both years. Students consistently noted negative mental health impacts and difficulty with social limitations. U.S. students noted decreased academic opportunities in both years while international students noted family concerns in 2021. U.S. students held negative views about social media due to fearmongering in 2021 and politicization in 2022. International students held neutral and/or positive views about social media. U.S. students relied on the CDC as a source of information while international students utilized the WHO. Conclusion: U.S. students had a more negative outlook as the pandemic progressed. It is difficult to draw comparisons within the international cohort due to limited responses obtained in 2022
2019冠状病毒病大流行对医学生的影响以及学生对2021年和2022年冠状病毒病政策和社交媒体的看法
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行在2021年和2022年以多种方式影响医学生。作为先前研究的延续,本研究试图确定与2021年相比,2022年大流行的变化性质如何影响医学生对政策和资源的知识、经验、观点。方法:在2021年和2022年通过开放式日志进行定性研究。参与者是从参加"全球健康与环境研讨会"的美国以及中美洲和加勒比的医科学生中招募的。结果:2021年和2022年分别获得142份和72份回复。对于新冠肺炎政策,美国学生对接种疫苗表示感谢,并批准了2021年在他们地区的倡议。后来,他们在针对特定区域的大流行病政策上也出现了同样的分歧。国际学生对这两年的政策主要表示认可。学生们一致指出了负面的心理健康影响和社会限制方面的困难。美国学生指出这两年的学习机会减少,而国际学生在2021年表示家庭担忧。美国学生对社交媒体持负面看法的原因分别是2021年的“制造恐慌”和2022年的“政治化”。国际学生对社交媒体持中立或积极态度。美国学生依赖疾病预防控制中心作为信息来源,而国际学生则使用世界卫生组织。结论:随着疫情的发展,美国学生对未来的看法越来越消极。由于2022年获得的答复有限,很难在国际队列中进行比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信