17 Establishment of Virtual Fracture Clinic in Princess Royal Hospital Telford: Experience and Recommendations During the First 9 Months

T. Khaleeq, P. Lancaster, K. Fakoya, P. Ferreira, U. Ahmed
{"title":"17 Establishment of Virtual Fracture Clinic in Princess Royal Hospital Telford: Experience and Recommendations During the First 9 Months","authors":"T. Khaleeq, P. Lancaster, K. Fakoya, P. Ferreira, U. Ahmed","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znac040.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) have been shown to be a safe and cost-effective way of managing outpatient referrals to the orthopaedic department. During the coronavirus pandemic there has been a push to reduce unnecessary patient contact whilst maintaining patient safety. Method A protocol was developed by the clinical team on how to manage common musculoskeletal presentations to A&E prior to COVID as part of routine service development. Patients broadly triaged into 4 categories; discharge with advice, referral to VFC, referral to face to face clinic or discussion with on call team. The first 9 months of data were analysed to assess types of injury seen and outcomes. Results In total 2489 patients were referred to VFC from internal and external sources. 734 patients were discharged without follow-up and 182 patients were discharged for physiotherapy review. Only 3 patients required admission. Regarding follow-ups, 431 patients had a virtual follow-up while 1036 of patients required further face to face follow up. 87 patients were triaged into subspecialty clinics. 37 patients were felt to have been referred inappropriately. Conclusions BOA guidelines state all patients must be reviewed within 72 hours of their orthopaedic injury. Implementation of a VFC allows this target to be achieved and at the same time reduce patient contact. Almost half the patients were discharged following VFC review, the remaining patients were followed up. This is especially relevant in the current pandemic where reducing unnecessary trips to hospital will benefit the patient and make the most of the resources available.","PeriodicalId":76612,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of oral surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of oral surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac040.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) have been shown to be a safe and cost-effective way of managing outpatient referrals to the orthopaedic department. During the coronavirus pandemic there has been a push to reduce unnecessary patient contact whilst maintaining patient safety. Method A protocol was developed by the clinical team on how to manage common musculoskeletal presentations to A&E prior to COVID as part of routine service development. Patients broadly triaged into 4 categories; discharge with advice, referral to VFC, referral to face to face clinic or discussion with on call team. The first 9 months of data were analysed to assess types of injury seen and outcomes. Results In total 2489 patients were referred to VFC from internal and external sources. 734 patients were discharged without follow-up and 182 patients were discharged for physiotherapy review. Only 3 patients required admission. Regarding follow-ups, 431 patients had a virtual follow-up while 1036 of patients required further face to face follow up. 87 patients were triaged into subspecialty clinics. 37 patients were felt to have been referred inappropriately. Conclusions BOA guidelines state all patients must be reviewed within 72 hours of their orthopaedic injury. Implementation of a VFC allows this target to be achieved and at the same time reduce patient contact. Almost half the patients were discharged following VFC review, the remaining patients were followed up. This is especially relevant in the current pandemic where reducing unnecessary trips to hospital will benefit the patient and make the most of the resources available.
泰尔福德皇家公主医院虚拟骨折诊所的建立:前9个月的经验和建议
虚拟骨折诊所(VFC)已被证明是一种安全和经济有效的管理骨科门诊转诊的方式。在冠状病毒大流行期间,一直在努力减少不必要的患者接触,同时维护患者安全。方法:作为常规服务开发的一部分,临床团队制定了一项关于如何在COVID之前管理常见的A&E肌肉骨骼表现的方案。患者大致分为4类;出院咨询,转介到VFC,转介到面对面诊所或与随叫随到的团队讨论。对前9个月的数据进行分析,以评估所见损伤的类型和结果。结果共2489例VFC患者由内、外来源转诊。734例患者未随访出院,182例患者出院进行物理治疗复查。只有3例患者需要住院。在随访方面,431例患者进行了虚拟随访,1036例患者需要进一步面对面随访。87例患者被分类到亚专科诊所。37例患者认为转诊不当。结论:BOA指南规定所有患者必须在骨科损伤后72小时内复查。VFC的实施可以实现这一目标,同时减少患者接触。近一半患者在VFC复查后出院,其余患者随访。这在当前的大流行中尤为重要,因为减少不必要的住院次数将使患者受益,并充分利用现有资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信