ANALYSIS OF THE UPPER BOUND ON THE COMPLEXITY OF LLL ALGORITHM

IF 0.3 Q4 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED
Y. Park, Jaehyun Park
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF THE UPPER BOUND ON THE COMPLEXITY OF LLL ALGORITHM","authors":"Y. Park, Jaehyun Park","doi":"10.12941/JKSIAM.2016.20.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the complexity of the LLL algorithm, invented by Lenstra, Lenstra, and Lovasz as a a well-known lattice reduction (LR) algorithm which is previously known as having the complexity of O(N 4 logB) multiplications (or, O(N 5 (logB) 2 ) bit operations) for a lattice basis matrix H(∈ R M×N ) where B is the maximum value among the squared norm of columns of H. This implies that the complexity of the lattice reduction algorithm depends only on the matrix size and the lattice basis norm. However, the matrix structures (i.e., the correlation among the columns) of a given lattice matrix, which is usually measured by its condition number or determinant, can affect the computational complexity of the LR algorithm. In this paper, to see how the matrix structures can affect the LLL algorithm’s complexity, we derive a more tight upper bound on the complexity of LLL algorithm in terms of the condition number and determinant of a given lattice matrix. We also analyze the complexities of the LLL updating/downdating schemes using the proposed upper bound.","PeriodicalId":41717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12941/JKSIAM.2016.20.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We analyze the complexity of the LLL algorithm, invented by Lenstra, Lenstra, and Lovasz as a a well-known lattice reduction (LR) algorithm which is previously known as having the complexity of O(N 4 logB) multiplications (or, O(N 5 (logB) 2 ) bit operations) for a lattice basis matrix H(∈ R M×N ) where B is the maximum value among the squared norm of columns of H. This implies that the complexity of the lattice reduction algorithm depends only on the matrix size and the lattice basis norm. However, the matrix structures (i.e., the correlation among the columns) of a given lattice matrix, which is usually measured by its condition number or determinant, can affect the computational complexity of the LR algorithm. In this paper, to see how the matrix structures can affect the LLL algorithm’s complexity, we derive a more tight upper bound on the complexity of LLL algorithm in terms of the condition number and determinant of a given lattice matrix. We also analyze the complexities of the LLL updating/downdating schemes using the proposed upper bound.
LLL算法复杂度的上界分析
我们分析微光算法的复杂性,由Lenstra发明,Lenstra, Lovasz作为一个著名的晶格减少(LR)算法,以前被称为O (N 4 logB)乘法的复杂性(或者,O (N 5 (logB) 2)位运算)的基格矩阵H(∈R M×N), B是最大值的平方准则列H .这意味着晶格的复杂性减少算法只取决于矩阵规模和晶格基础规范。然而,给定晶格矩阵的矩阵结构(即列之间的相关性)通常通过其条件数或行列式来衡量,这可能会影响LR算法的计算复杂度。在本文中,为了了解矩阵结构如何影响LLL算法的复杂度,我们从给定晶格矩阵的条件数和行列式中推导出了LLL算法复杂度的一个更紧的上界。我们还利用提出的上界分析了LLL更新/降期方案的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信