Gender gaps in political attitudes revisited: the conditional influence of non-binary gender on left–right ideology and GAL-TAN opinions

IF 2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Maria Solevid, Lena Wängnerud, Monika Djerf-Pierre, Elias Markstedt
{"title":"Gender gaps in political attitudes revisited: the conditional influence of non-binary gender on left–right ideology and GAL-TAN opinions","authors":"Maria Solevid, Lena Wängnerud, Monika Djerf-Pierre, Elias Markstedt","doi":"10.1332/251510820x15978604738684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across surveys and regardless of controls, women in many Western countries are consistently more politically left-leaning than men. More recently, however, innovative measures of non-binary gender identity suggest important heterogeneity in political attitudes within the categories of ‘women’ and ‘men’. Building from this, we study the direct and conditional associations between sex and non-binary gender on two political attitude dimensions: (1) left–right ideology; and (2) green/alternative/liberal versus traditionalist/authoritarian/nationalist opinions. Using a Swedish population-based survey from 2013, we find no evidence that political attitudes vary by non-binary gender identity alone, and only weak evidence that political attitudes vary by sex. However, supporting our conditional hypotheses, we find that gender (non)conformity matters significantly. Specifically, men with many masculine traits and women with many feminine traits stand more to the right and show more traditionalist/authoritarian/nationalist opinions than men and women who are less gender conforming.","PeriodicalId":36315,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/251510820x15978604738684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Across surveys and regardless of controls, women in many Western countries are consistently more politically left-leaning than men. More recently, however, innovative measures of non-binary gender identity suggest important heterogeneity in political attitudes within the categories of ‘women’ and ‘men’. Building from this, we study the direct and conditional associations between sex and non-binary gender on two political attitude dimensions: (1) left–right ideology; and (2) green/alternative/liberal versus traditionalist/authoritarian/nationalist opinions. Using a Swedish population-based survey from 2013, we find no evidence that political attitudes vary by non-binary gender identity alone, and only weak evidence that political attitudes vary by sex. However, supporting our conditional hypotheses, we find that gender (non)conformity matters significantly. Specifically, men with many masculine traits and women with many feminine traits stand more to the right and show more traditionalist/authoritarian/nationalist opinions than men and women who are less gender conforming.
政治态度中的性别差异:非二元性别对左右意识形态和GAL-TAN观点的条件影响
在各种调查中,不考虑控制因素,许多西方国家的女性在政治上一直比男性更左倾。然而,最近,非二元性别认同的创新措施表明,在“女性”和“男性”类别中,政治态度存在重要的异质性。在此基础上,我们研究了性别与非二元性别在两个政治态度维度上的直接和条件关联:(1)左右意识形态;(2)绿色/另类/自由主义与传统主义/威权主义/民族主义的观点。通过2013年瑞典的一项人口调查,我们发现没有证据表明政治态度仅因非二元性别认同而异,只有微弱的证据表明政治态度因性别而异。然而,为了支持我们的条件假设,我们发现性别(不)一致性非常重要。具体来说,具有许多男性特征的男性和具有许多女性特征的女性比不太符合性别的男性和女性更倾向于右边,表现出更多的传统主义/威权主义/民族主义观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Politics and Gender
European Journal of Politics and Gender Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信