Social Media and Selection: Political Issue Similarity, Liking, and the Moderating Effect of Social Media Platform

MIS Q. Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2020/14119
Julie T. Wade, P. Roth, J. Thatcher, Michael Dinger
{"title":"Social Media and Selection: Political Issue Similarity, Liking, and the Moderating Effect of Social Media Platform","authors":"Julie T. Wade, P. Roth, J. Thatcher, Michael Dinger","doi":"10.25300/MISQ/2020/14119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we investigate how social media has changed hiring processes, an important internal activity of organizations. Specifically, we probe how viewing job-relevant and job-irrelevant social media content influences hiring managers’ ratings of job applicants. To do so, we conducted an experiment that manipulated the presence of social media content on political issues and job-relevant information as well as the social media platforms on which they appear. We balanced job-relevant and job-irrelevant content because we were interested in assessing whether information about political issues continued to have effects even in the presence of information relating to a job applicant’s knowledge, skills, and abilities. We found that social media posts that convey information about political issues do have effects, even in the presence of job-relevant information. We also found that, for some issues, the source of social media content matters, with platform effects impacting the assessment of job applicants. This work has timely implications, suggesting that managers be made aware that both social media content and the platform on which it is viewed can contaminate hiring processes. We suggest a need for future research at the intersection between social media and hiring policies.","PeriodicalId":18743,"journal":{"name":"MIS Q.","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIS Q.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In this work, we investigate how social media has changed hiring processes, an important internal activity of organizations. Specifically, we probe how viewing job-relevant and job-irrelevant social media content influences hiring managers’ ratings of job applicants. To do so, we conducted an experiment that manipulated the presence of social media content on political issues and job-relevant information as well as the social media platforms on which they appear. We balanced job-relevant and job-irrelevant content because we were interested in assessing whether information about political issues continued to have effects even in the presence of information relating to a job applicant’s knowledge, skills, and abilities. We found that social media posts that convey information about political issues do have effects, even in the presence of job-relevant information. We also found that, for some issues, the source of social media content matters, with platform effects impacting the assessment of job applicants. This work has timely implications, suggesting that managers be made aware that both social media content and the platform on which it is viewed can contaminate hiring processes. We suggest a need for future research at the intersection between social media and hiring policies.
社交媒体与选择:政治议题相似度、喜好度及社交媒体平台的调节作用
在这项工作中,我们调查了社交媒体如何改变招聘流程,这是组织的一项重要内部活动。具体来说,我们探讨了浏览与工作相关和与工作无关的社交媒体内容如何影响招聘经理对求职者的评级。为此,我们进行了一项实验,操纵社交媒体上有关政治问题和工作相关信息的内容,以及这些内容出现的社交媒体平台。我们平衡了与工作相关和与工作无关的内容,因为我们对评估政治问题的信息是否在与求职者的知识、技能和能力相关的信息存在的情况下继续产生影响感兴趣。我们发现,传达政治问题信息的社交媒体帖子确实有影响,即使是在与工作相关的信息存在的情况下。我们还发现,在某些问题上,社交媒体内容的来源很重要,平台效应会影响求职者的评估。这项研究具有及时的意义,表明管理者应该意识到社交媒体内容和观看这些内容的平台都可能影响招聘流程。我们建议未来需要对社交媒体和招聘政策之间的交集进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信