Effects of Feeding Mentha Pulegium L. as an Alternative to Antibiotics on Performance of Broilers

Majid Goodarzi, Shahram Nanekarani
{"title":"Effects of Feeding Mentha Pulegium L. as an Alternative to Antibiotics on Performance of Broilers","authors":"Majid Goodarzi,&nbsp;Shahram Nanekarani","doi":"10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different levels of powdered <em>Mentha pulegiumL.</em> (pennyroyal; medicinal plant) obtained from its dried aerial part on performance and carcass traits, of broilers. 200 broiler chicks (Ross 308) were used in a completely randomized design in five treatments and four replicates (10 birds per replicate) for 42 days. The treatment groups consisted of a control group (C) with no pennyroyal and Antibiotic supplementation,(A) with no pennyroyal and contain 300<!--> <!-->mg/Kg antibiotic virginiamicin and B, D and E experimental groups with different levels of pennyroyal <em>(</em>1, 2 and 3%, respectively). There were significant differences between treatments on performance and carcass traits of broilers (p&lt;0.05). The lowest amount of daily weight gain (43.50<!--> <!-->g) and the highest feed conversion (1.75) were observed in the control group, whereas the highest amount of daily weight gain (49.9<!--> <!-->g), the lowest feed conversion (1.62), and the highest breast percent (23.08) were observed in Group A. There was no significant difference between Groups A and D in the yield trait. The overall results showed that the use of 2% of pennyroyal medicinal plant in the diets of broilers has positive effects on their performance and carcass traits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8107,"journal":{"name":"APCBEE Procedia","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 53-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.079","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APCBEE Procedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212670814000803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of different levels of powdered Mentha pulegiumL. (pennyroyal; medicinal plant) obtained from its dried aerial part on performance and carcass traits, of broilers. 200 broiler chicks (Ross 308) were used in a completely randomized design in five treatments and four replicates (10 birds per replicate) for 42 days. The treatment groups consisted of a control group (C) with no pennyroyal and Antibiotic supplementation,(A) with no pennyroyal and contain 300 mg/Kg antibiotic virginiamicin and B, D and E experimental groups with different levels of pennyroyal (1, 2 and 3%, respectively). There were significant differences between treatments on performance and carcass traits of broilers (p<0.05). The lowest amount of daily weight gain (43.50 g) and the highest feed conversion (1.75) were observed in the control group, whereas the highest amount of daily weight gain (49.9 g), the lowest feed conversion (1.62), and the highest breast percent (23.08) were observed in Group A. There was no significant difference between Groups A and D in the yield trait. The overall results showed that the use of 2% of pennyroyal medicinal plant in the diets of broilers has positive effects on their performance and carcass traits.

饲用薄荷替代抗生素对肉仔鸡生产性能的影响
本实验旨在评价不同剂量薄荷粉的作用。(薄荷油;药用植物)从其干燥的地上部分获得,用于肉鸡的生产性能和胴体性状。试验选用罗斯308肉鸡200只,采用完全随机设计,分5个处理、4个重复(每个重复10只),试验期42 d。试验组为对照组(C组),不添加牛蒡子并添加抗生素;对照组(a组)不添加牛蒡子并添加抗生素维吉尼亚霉素300 mg/Kg;试验组B、D、E组分别添加不同水平的牛蒡子(1、2、3%)。不同处理肉鸡生产性能和胴体性状差异显著(p < 0.05)。对照组的日增重最低(43.50 g),饲料系数最高(1.75 g), A组的日增重最高(49.9 g),饲料系数最低(1.62%),乳房率最高(23.08)。A组与D组的产量性状差异不显著。综上所述,在肉鸡饲粮中添加2%的皇花药用植物对肉鸡生产性能和胴体性状有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信