Serotonin, noradrenaline and cognitive function: a preliminary investigation of the acute pharmacodynamic effects of a serotonin versus a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor

Pradeep J. Nathan, G. Sitaram, C. Stough, R. Silberstein, Avni Sali
{"title":"Serotonin, noradrenaline and cognitive function: a preliminary investigation of the acute pharmacodynamic effects of a serotonin versus a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor","authors":"Pradeep J. Nathan, G. Sitaram, C. Stough, R. Silberstein, Avni Sali","doi":"10.1097/00008877-200011000-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparisons of the behavioural side-effect profiles of antidepressants that inhibit either serotonin or both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake, may reveal differences in cognitive and psychomotor functions, which may be attributed to their relative pharmacological selectivity for potentiating monoamine neurotransmission in the central nervous system. The aim of the present study was to determine the acute pharmacodynamic effects of citalopram and venlafaxine, on cognitive and psychomotor performance. Nine healthy male volunteers received a single clinical dose of citalopram, venlafaxine or amitriptyline (positive control) in a double-blind placebo-controlled design. Cognitive and psychomotor tests and a subjective measure of sedation were examined before and 1, 2 and 4 hours after drug administration. Citalopram improved psychomotor responses to sensory stimuli and sustained attention, with significant decreases in movement times of the choice reaction time test and an increase in critical flicker fusion threshold. Venlafaxine did not affect performances on any of the cognitive or psychomotor tests examined. Differences may be related to relative potencies of the compounds for monoamine reuptake inhibition.","PeriodicalId":8741,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Pharmacology","volume":"105 1","pages":"639-642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008877-200011000-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Comparisons of the behavioural side-effect profiles of antidepressants that inhibit either serotonin or both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake, may reveal differences in cognitive and psychomotor functions, which may be attributed to their relative pharmacological selectivity for potentiating monoamine neurotransmission in the central nervous system. The aim of the present study was to determine the acute pharmacodynamic effects of citalopram and venlafaxine, on cognitive and psychomotor performance. Nine healthy male volunteers received a single clinical dose of citalopram, venlafaxine or amitriptyline (positive control) in a double-blind placebo-controlled design. Cognitive and psychomotor tests and a subjective measure of sedation were examined before and 1, 2 and 4 hours after drug administration. Citalopram improved psychomotor responses to sensory stimuli and sustained attention, with significant decreases in movement times of the choice reaction time test and an increase in critical flicker fusion threshold. Venlafaxine did not affect performances on any of the cognitive or psychomotor tests examined. Differences may be related to relative potencies of the compounds for monoamine reuptake inhibition.
血清素、去甲肾上腺素和认知功能:血清素与血清素和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂的急性药效学效应的初步研究
对抑制5 -羟色胺或同时抑制5 -羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取的抗抑郁药的行为副作用进行比较,可能揭示认知和精神运动功能的差异,这可能归因于它们在中枢神经系统中增强单胺神经传递的相对药理选择性。本研究的目的是确定西酞普兰和文拉法辛对认知和精神运动表现的急性药效学影响。在双盲安慰剂对照设计中,9名健康男性志愿者接受了单剂量的西酞普兰、文拉法辛或阿米替林(阳性对照)。在给药前、给药后1、2和4小时进行认知和精神运动测试以及镇静的主观测量。西酞普兰改善了对感觉刺激和持续注意的精神运动反应,显著降低了选择反应时间测试的运动次数,增加了临界闪烁融合阈值。文拉法辛不影响任何认知或精神运动测试的表现。差异可能与化合物抑制单胺再摄取的相对效力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信