What Does Data on Functional Income Distribution tell us about Trends in and Correlates of Income Inequality in The Asia-Pacific?

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Selim Raihan
{"title":"What Does Data on Functional Income Distribution tell us about Trends in and Correlates of Income Inequality in The Asia-Pacific?","authors":"Selim Raihan","doi":"10.17576/jem-2022-5603-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an analysis of the trend and patterns of the share of labour in GDP, the gap between wage and productivity, and inequality with a focus on Asia-Pacific countries for the period between 2004 and 2017. Descriptive analysis confirms a downward trend in labour income shares during the study period in most of the countries in the Asia-Pacific. Our analysis also shows that majority of the Asia-Pacific countries additionally witnessed a rise in the gap between labour productivity and wage, defined as the shortfall of wage from labour productivity as a percentage of wage. Furthermore, inequality, measured through the income Gini index also increased in these countries. Panel econometric regression results suggest that trade openness and FDI have a negative association with the labour share in GDP in the Asia-Pacific countries while being positively associated with the gap. Economic growth and structural transformation processes have also not been favourable in raising the labour share in GDP. Among other findings, technological development has not been labour-friendly in most of these countries. Non-agricultural employment share in total employment has a negative association with the labour share in GDP and is positively associated with the gap. Yet our analyses have confirmed that the reduction in labour share in income is associated with rising inequality in the Asia-Pacific countries. We conclude by discussing the role of two related major instruments of government policies -- revenue generation, and public expenditure on social sectors -- for addressing challenges related to widening inequality in the region.","PeriodicalId":35929,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/jem-2022-5603-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the trend and patterns of the share of labour in GDP, the gap between wage and productivity, and inequality with a focus on Asia-Pacific countries for the period between 2004 and 2017. Descriptive analysis confirms a downward trend in labour income shares during the study period in most of the countries in the Asia-Pacific. Our analysis also shows that majority of the Asia-Pacific countries additionally witnessed a rise in the gap between labour productivity and wage, defined as the shortfall of wage from labour productivity as a percentage of wage. Furthermore, inequality, measured through the income Gini index also increased in these countries. Panel econometric regression results suggest that trade openness and FDI have a negative association with the labour share in GDP in the Asia-Pacific countries while being positively associated with the gap. Economic growth and structural transformation processes have also not been favourable in raising the labour share in GDP. Among other findings, technological development has not been labour-friendly in most of these countries. Non-agricultural employment share in total employment has a negative association with the labour share in GDP and is positively associated with the gap. Yet our analyses have confirmed that the reduction in labour share in income is associated with rising inequality in the Asia-Pacific countries. We conclude by discussing the role of two related major instruments of government policies -- revenue generation, and public expenditure on social sectors -- for addressing challenges related to widening inequality in the region.
关于亚太地区收入不平等的趋势和相关因素,功能性收入分配数据告诉我们什么?
本文以2004年至2017年亚太国家为重点,分析了劳动力在GDP中所占份额的趋势和模式、工资与生产率之间的差距以及不平等现象。描述性分析证实,在研究期间,亚太地区大多数国家的劳动收入份额呈下降趋势。我们的分析还表明,大多数亚太国家的劳动生产率与工资之间的差距也在扩大,这一差距的定义是劳动生产率与工资之间的差距占工资的百分比。此外,通过收入基尼指数衡量的不平等在这些国家也有所加剧。面板计量回归结果表明,亚太国家的贸易开放程度和FDI与劳动占GDP的比重呈负相关,而与差距呈正相关。经济增长和结构转型进程也不利于提高劳动力在国内生产总值中的份额。除其他发现外,大多数这些国家的技术发展对劳工并不友好。非农就业占总就业的比例与劳动占GDP的比例呈负相关,与差距呈正相关。然而,我们的分析证实,劳动收入占比的下降与亚太国家不平等加剧有关。最后,我们讨论了政府政策的两个相关主要工具——创收和社会部门的公共支出——在应对与该地区不平等加剧相关的挑战方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia
Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia (JEM) is a Scopus indexed peer reviewed journal published by UKM Press (Penerbit UKM), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. The journal publishes original research articles as well as short notes, comments and book reviews on all aspects of economics, particularly those pertaining to the developing economies. Articles are published in both English and Malay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信