Correlation of Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire and Quantitative Sensory Testing Among Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Q2 Medicine
M. N. Moore, Beth I Wallace, Jing Song, L. Muhammad, Andrew C. Heisler, D. Clauw, M. Bolster, W. Marder, T. Neogi, Alyssa Wohlfahrt, D. Dunlop, Yvonne C. Lee
{"title":"Correlation of Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire and Quantitative Sensory Testing Among Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis","authors":"M. N. Moore, Beth I Wallace, Jing Song, L. Muhammad, Andrew C. Heisler, D. Clauw, M. Bolster, W. Marder, T. Neogi, Alyssa Wohlfahrt, D. Dunlop, Yvonne C. Lee","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-715260/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly demonstrate disordered pain processing associated with high pain sensitization. Pain sensitization is often assessed using quantitative sensory testing (QST), which is burdensome to patients. The self-administered Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (FSQ) has been proposed as a low-burden, surrogate measure of central pain sensitization. We examined the correlation between FSQ and QST in patients with active RA. Methods Participants in the Central Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CPIRA) cohort underwent FSQ and QST evaluation at enrollment. QST measures included pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the thumb, trapezius, wrist, and knee; temporal summation (TS) at the wrist and arm; and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Partial Spearman correlation between FSQ and each QST measure was assessed, adjusted for demographic factors, study site, disease characteristics, and pain catastrophizing. Sensitivity analyses included (1) stratified analysis by sex and (2) evaluation of how each component of FSQ associates with the QST measures. Results Among 285 participants with active RA, FSQ was weakly but statistically significantly correlated with PPT (r range = –0.31 to –0.21), and TS (r range = 0.13-0.15) at all sites in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment, statistically significant correlations persisted for TS at the wrist and PPT at all sites (except the thumb). Sensitivity analyses did not identify differences in association based on sex or with individual FSQ components. Conclusion FSQ and QST were correlated among participants with active RA, but the strength of association was weak. QST and FSQ are not interchangeable measures of pain sensitization.","PeriodicalId":35278,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-715260/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) commonly demonstrate disordered pain processing associated with high pain sensitization. Pain sensitization is often assessed using quantitative sensory testing (QST), which is burdensome to patients. The self-administered Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (FSQ) has been proposed as a low-burden, surrogate measure of central pain sensitization. We examined the correlation between FSQ and QST in patients with active RA. Methods Participants in the Central Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CPIRA) cohort underwent FSQ and QST evaluation at enrollment. QST measures included pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the thumb, trapezius, wrist, and knee; temporal summation (TS) at the wrist and arm; and conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Partial Spearman correlation between FSQ and each QST measure was assessed, adjusted for demographic factors, study site, disease characteristics, and pain catastrophizing. Sensitivity analyses included (1) stratified analysis by sex and (2) evaluation of how each component of FSQ associates with the QST measures. Results Among 285 participants with active RA, FSQ was weakly but statistically significantly correlated with PPT (r range = –0.31 to –0.21), and TS (r range = 0.13-0.15) at all sites in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment, statistically significant correlations persisted for TS at the wrist and PPT at all sites (except the thumb). Sensitivity analyses did not identify differences in association based on sex or with individual FSQ components. Conclusion FSQ and QST were correlated among participants with active RA, but the strength of association was weak. QST and FSQ are not interchangeable measures of pain sensitization.
活动期类风湿关节炎患者纤维肌痛调查问卷与定量感觉测试的相关性
目的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者通常表现出与高疼痛致敏相关的疼痛处理紊乱。通常使用定量感觉测试(QST)来评估疼痛致敏性,这对患者来说是一种负担。自我管理的纤维肌痛调查问卷(FSQ)已被提议作为中枢性疼痛致敏的低负担替代措施。我们研究了活动期RA患者FSQ和QST之间的相关性。方法类风湿性关节炎中枢性疼痛(cira)队列的参与者在入组时进行FSQ和QST评估。QST测量包括拇指、斜方肌、手腕和膝盖的压痛阈值(PPT);手腕和手臂颞统(TS);和条件疼痛调节(CPM)。评估FSQ与每项QST测量之间的部分Spearman相关性,并根据人口统计学因素、研究地点、疾病特征和疼痛灾变进行调整。敏感性分析包括(1)按性别分层分析和(2)评估FSQ的每个组成部分与QST测量的关联。结果在285名RA活动期患者中,FSQ与PPT (r范围= -0.31 ~ -0.21)和TS (r范围= 0.13 ~ 0.15)在所有部位呈弱相关,但具有统计学意义。调整后,腕部TS和所有部位PPT(拇指除外)的统计学显著相关性仍然存在。敏感性分析没有发现基于性别或个体FSQ成分的关联差异。结论FSQ和QST在活动期RA患者中存在相关性,但相关性较弱。QST和FSQ不能互换测量疼痛致敏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement
The Journal of rheumatology. Supplement Medicine-Medicine (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Duncan A. Gordon, The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 36 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信