{"title":"W. W. Werntz and the curious case of ASR No. 78 (1957): insights and lessons for historians","authors":"D. L. Flesher, G. Previts, Tonya K. Flesher","doi":"10.1080/21552851.2020.1774398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Securities and Exchange Commission censured its former Chief Accountant, William W. Werntz, in a case involving his first audit after leaving the SEC. This study investigates the oddities and mysteries surrounding this case and the conclusions reveal lessons for accounting historians. One conclusion is that the establishment of accounting and auditing standards is conducted in a political environment. Further, individuals who work in this environment have complicated and, sometimes, adversarial past associations and some promote ideas out of positions of self-interest, personal animosities, or for the sake of appearances. Thus accounting historians are warned to be aware of the political and social facets that underlie events and actions when trying to discover the theory behind the rules and to also suspect that the position taken may not have been for ideological reasons. As with this episode, some mysteries may not be resolved because vital facts are not available and thus the most important warning is to gather facts while the witnesses are available to provide information.","PeriodicalId":43233,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"291 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2020.1774398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Securities and Exchange Commission censured its former Chief Accountant, William W. Werntz, in a case involving his first audit after leaving the SEC. This study investigates the oddities and mysteries surrounding this case and the conclusions reveal lessons for accounting historians. One conclusion is that the establishment of accounting and auditing standards is conducted in a political environment. Further, individuals who work in this environment have complicated and, sometimes, adversarial past associations and some promote ideas out of positions of self-interest, personal animosities, or for the sake of appearances. Thus accounting historians are warned to be aware of the political and social facets that underlie events and actions when trying to discover the theory behind the rules and to also suspect that the position taken may not have been for ideological reasons. As with this episode, some mysteries may not be resolved because vital facts are not available and thus the most important warning is to gather facts while the witnesses are available to provide information.
美国证券交易委员会(SEC)对其前总会计师威廉·w·沃恩茨(William W. Werntz)在离开SEC后的首次审计案件进行了谴责。本研究调查了围绕此案的怪异和神秘之处,结论为会计历史学家提供了教训。一个结论是,会计和审计准则的制定是在政治环境中进行的。此外,在这种环境中工作的人有复杂的、有时是敌对的过去的联系,有些人出于自身利益、个人仇恨或为了面子而提倡一些想法。因此,会计历史学家被警告,在试图发现规则背后的理论时,要意识到事件和行为背后的政治和社会方面,并怀疑所采取的立场可能不是出于意识形态的原因。就像这一集一样,一些谜团可能无法解开,因为没有重要的事实,因此最重要的警告是在证人可以提供信息的时候收集事实。