W. W. Werntz and the curious case of ASR No. 78 (1957): insights and lessons for historians

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS
D. L. Flesher, G. Previts, Tonya K. Flesher
{"title":"W. W. Werntz and the curious case of ASR No. 78 (1957): insights and lessons for historians","authors":"D. L. Flesher, G. Previts, Tonya K. Flesher","doi":"10.1080/21552851.2020.1774398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Securities and Exchange Commission censured its former Chief Accountant, William W. Werntz, in a case involving his first audit after leaving the SEC. This study investigates the oddities and mysteries surrounding this case and the conclusions reveal lessons for accounting historians. One conclusion is that the establishment of accounting and auditing standards is conducted in a political environment. Further, individuals who work in this environment have complicated and, sometimes, adversarial past associations and some promote ideas out of positions of self-interest, personal animosities, or for the sake of appearances. Thus accounting historians are warned to be aware of the political and social facets that underlie events and actions when trying to discover the theory behind the rules and to also suspect that the position taken may not have been for ideological reasons. As with this episode, some mysteries may not be resolved because vital facts are not available and thus the most important warning is to gather facts while the witnesses are available to provide information.","PeriodicalId":43233,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"291 - 305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2020.1774398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Securities and Exchange Commission censured its former Chief Accountant, William W. Werntz, in a case involving his first audit after leaving the SEC. This study investigates the oddities and mysteries surrounding this case and the conclusions reveal lessons for accounting historians. One conclusion is that the establishment of accounting and auditing standards is conducted in a political environment. Further, individuals who work in this environment have complicated and, sometimes, adversarial past associations and some promote ideas out of positions of self-interest, personal animosities, or for the sake of appearances. Thus accounting historians are warned to be aware of the political and social facets that underlie events and actions when trying to discover the theory behind the rules and to also suspect that the position taken may not have been for ideological reasons. As with this episode, some mysteries may not be resolved because vital facts are not available and thus the most important warning is to gather facts while the witnesses are available to provide information.
w.w.w Werntz和ASR第78号(1957)的奇怪案例:对历史学家的见解和教训
美国证券交易委员会(SEC)对其前总会计师威廉·w·沃恩茨(William W. Werntz)在离开SEC后的首次审计案件进行了谴责。本研究调查了围绕此案的怪异和神秘之处,结论为会计历史学家提供了教训。一个结论是,会计和审计准则的制定是在政治环境中进行的。此外,在这种环境中工作的人有复杂的、有时是敌对的过去的联系,有些人出于自身利益、个人仇恨或为了面子而提倡一些想法。因此,会计历史学家被警告,在试图发现规则背后的理论时,要意识到事件和行为背后的政治和社会方面,并怀疑所采取的立场可能不是出于意识形态的原因。就像这一集一样,一些谜团可能无法解开,因为没有重要的事实,因此最重要的警告是在证人可以提供信息的时候收集事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信