Residenzialità per la disabilità intellettiva: evidenze, principi evolutivi e implicazioni applicative

Marco O. Bertelli , Raymond Ceccotto , Edi Farnetani
{"title":"Residenzialità per la disabilità intellettiva: evidenze, principi evolutivi e implicazioni applicative","authors":"Marco O. Bertelli ,&nbsp;Raymond Ceccotto ,&nbsp;Edi Farnetani","doi":"10.1016/j.quip.2010.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Since the last appraisals of international experiences in institutionalized care for persons with intellectual disabilities (ID), the concept of residentiality is once again evolving. The purpose of this article is to review and discuss the most recent and significant literature on this topic.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The authors, experienced professionals in this field, performed a search of relevant scientific articles published in the last 5 years. These articles were then reviewed and analyzed to produce the present review.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Small apartments within the community and the so-called <em>cluster centres</em> are currently considered the most efficient residential solutions for individuals with ID. However, the criteria for judging the appropriateness of a residence for these persons are heterogeneous, poorly defined, or overly restrictive. Growing attention is being placed on person-related measures, including quality of life, which is one of the most widely used parameter. It reflects the individual relation between attribution of importance and perception of satisfaction in areas of life with qualitative implications for all people.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Research on residential care for people with ID is still limited, quantitatively and qualitatively. Nevertheless, it appears to be capable of identifying some solutions that are more effective than others, at least in terms of certain parameters. The application of new conceptual models seems to support the need for a broad range of residential solutions capable of meeting a variety of individual needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101052,"journal":{"name":"Quaderni Italiani di Psichiatria","volume":"29 3","pages":"Pages 106-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.quip.2010.06.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaderni Italiani di Psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0393064510000344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Since the last appraisals of international experiences in institutionalized care for persons with intellectual disabilities (ID), the concept of residentiality is once again evolving. The purpose of this article is to review and discuss the most recent and significant literature on this topic.

Materials and methods

The authors, experienced professionals in this field, performed a search of relevant scientific articles published in the last 5 years. These articles were then reviewed and analyzed to produce the present review.

Results

Small apartments within the community and the so-called cluster centres are currently considered the most efficient residential solutions for individuals with ID. However, the criteria for judging the appropriateness of a residence for these persons are heterogeneous, poorly defined, or overly restrictive. Growing attention is being placed on person-related measures, including quality of life, which is one of the most widely used parameter. It reflects the individual relation between attribution of importance and perception of satisfaction in areas of life with qualitative implications for all people.

Conclusions

Research on residential care for people with ID is still limited, quantitatively and qualitatively. Nevertheless, it appears to be capable of identifying some solutions that are more effective than others, at least in terms of certain parameters. The application of new conceptual models seems to support the need for a broad range of residential solutions capable of meeting a variety of individual needs.

智能残疾住宅:证据、进化原理和应用含义
自上次对智障人士(ID)机构护理的国际经验进行评估以来,居住的概念再次发展。本文的目的是回顾和讨论关于这一主题的最新和重要的文献。材料和方法作者是该领域经验丰富的专业人士,对近5年发表的相关科学文章进行了检索。然后对这些文章进行审查和分析,以产生本综述。结果社区内的小公寓和所谓的集群中心目前被认为是身份证个人最有效的居住解决方案。然而,判断这些人的住所是否合适的标准是不同的、定义不清的或过于严格的。人们越来越注意与人有关的措施,包括生活质量,这是最广泛使用的参数之一。它反映了重要性归因和对生活领域满意度的感知之间的个体关系,对所有人都有定性影响。结论对身份证患者的住宿照护的研究在数量和质量上仍然有限。然而,它似乎能够确定一些比其他解决办法更有效的办法,至少在某些参数方面是这样。新概念模型的应用似乎支持了对能够满足各种个人需求的广泛住宅解决方案的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信