Real Madrid: “Franco’s Club” or “Ambassador of Spain”?

Stadion Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5771/0172-4029-2021-1-6
Julia Rieck
{"title":"Real Madrid: “Franco’s Club” or “Ambassador of Spain”?","authors":"Julia Rieck","doi":"10.5771/0172-4029-2021-1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some observers consider the team to be “Franco’s club” while others consider it as an “Ambassador of Spain”. This paper argues that both attributions were closely intertwined. To demonstrate this, in the first section the analysis delves into the Spanish nation-state and describes how the centre-periphery cleavage determined Francoist nationalism. The second section then sheds light on the ways in which Real Madrid’s identity shifted between monarchist, aristocratic, bourgeois and republican throughout the first half of the 20th century and yet always remained a fundamentally Spanish one. The focus here lies on the 1950s and early 1960s, when Real Madrid became the most successful football club in the world, and one of the most respected Spanish entities abroad. Thirdly, in order to achieve a more differentiated picture of the club’s own identity and self-perception (how the club perceived itself), for one, and external perceptions of it (how the club was perceived by others) for another, four groups or places, which comprise the entity Real Madrid, are analysed in greater detail: (1) club functionaries, (2) the players, (3) club outsiders, the press and politicians in particular, and finally (4) spectators especially those who tend to assign a certain significance to the club. Particularly notable was the behaviour of the functionaries who voluntarily carried out tasks on behalf of the Spanish government. Thus, the article cautions against the widespread assumption that sport is unilaterally instrumentalised by politics and calls for always viewing the role of a football club in context of dictatorship in relation to other clubs and institutions.","PeriodicalId":82798,"journal":{"name":"Stadion","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stadion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0172-4029-2021-1-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some observers consider the team to be “Franco’s club” while others consider it as an “Ambassador of Spain”. This paper argues that both attributions were closely intertwined. To demonstrate this, in the first section the analysis delves into the Spanish nation-state and describes how the centre-periphery cleavage determined Francoist nationalism. The second section then sheds light on the ways in which Real Madrid’s identity shifted between monarchist, aristocratic, bourgeois and republican throughout the first half of the 20th century and yet always remained a fundamentally Spanish one. The focus here lies on the 1950s and early 1960s, when Real Madrid became the most successful football club in the world, and one of the most respected Spanish entities abroad. Thirdly, in order to achieve a more differentiated picture of the club’s own identity and self-perception (how the club perceived itself), for one, and external perceptions of it (how the club was perceived by others) for another, four groups or places, which comprise the entity Real Madrid, are analysed in greater detail: (1) club functionaries, (2) the players, (3) club outsiders, the press and politicians in particular, and finally (4) spectators especially those who tend to assign a certain significance to the club. Particularly notable was the behaviour of the functionaries who voluntarily carried out tasks on behalf of the Spanish government. Thus, the article cautions against the widespread assumption that sport is unilaterally instrumentalised by politics and calls for always viewing the role of a football club in context of dictatorship in relation to other clubs and institutions.
皇家马德里:“佛朗哥俱乐部”还是“西班牙大使”?
一些观察家认为这支球队是“佛朗哥的俱乐部”,而另一些人则认为它是“西班牙大使”。本文认为,这两种归因是紧密交织在一起的。为了证明这一点,在第一部分中,分析深入研究了西班牙的民族国家,并描述了中心边缘的分裂是如何决定弗朗哥民族主义的。第二部分揭示了皇家马德里在20世纪上半叶的身份在君主制、贵族、资产阶级和共和制之间的转变,但始终保持着基本的西班牙风格。这里的重点是20世纪50年代和60年代初,当时皇家马德里成为世界上最成功的足球俱乐部,也是西班牙在海外最受尊敬的实体之一。第三,为了更好地了解俱乐部自身的身份和自我认知(俱乐部如何看待自己),以及外部对俱乐部的认知(其他人如何看待俱乐部),我们对组成皇家马德里实体的四个群体或地点进行了更详细的分析:(1)俱乐部工作人员,(2)球员,(3)俱乐部外部人士,特别是新闻界和政治家,最后(4)观众,特别是那些倾向于给俱乐部赋予某种意义的人。特别值得注意的是那些自愿代表西班牙政府执行任务的工作人员的行为。因此,本文警告人们不要普遍认为体育是被政治单方面利用的,并呼吁始终在与其他俱乐部和机构有关的独裁背景下看待足球俱乐部的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信