Sameness and difference in narrative modes and narrative sense making: The case of Ramsey Campbell’s “The Scar”

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Mari Hatavara, Jarkko Toikkanen
{"title":"Sameness and difference in narrative modes and narrative sense making: The case of Ramsey Campbell’s “The Scar”","authors":"Mari Hatavara, Jarkko Toikkanen","doi":"10.1515/fns-2019-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article discusses basic questions of narrative studies and definitions of narrative from a historical and conceptual perspective in order to map the terrain between different narratologies. The focus is placed on the question of how fiction interacts with other realms of our lives or, more specifically, how reading fiction both involves and affects our everyday meaning making operations. British horror writer Ramsey Campbell’s (b. 1946) short story “The Scar” (1967) will be used as a test case to show how both narrative modes of representation and the reader’s narrative sense making operations may travel between art and the everyday, from fiction to life and back. We argue that the cognitively inspired narrative studies need to pair up with linguistically oriented narratology to gain the necessary semiotic sensitivity to the forms and modes of narrative sense making. Narratology, in turn, needs to explore in detail what it is in the narrative form that enables it to function as a tool for reaching out and making sense of the unfamiliar. In our view, reading fictional narratives such as “The Scar” can help in learning and adopting linguistic resources and story patterns from fiction to our everyday sense making efforts.","PeriodicalId":29849,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Narrative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fns-2019-0009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The article discusses basic questions of narrative studies and definitions of narrative from a historical and conceptual perspective in order to map the terrain between different narratologies. The focus is placed on the question of how fiction interacts with other realms of our lives or, more specifically, how reading fiction both involves and affects our everyday meaning making operations. British horror writer Ramsey Campbell’s (b. 1946) short story “The Scar” (1967) will be used as a test case to show how both narrative modes of representation and the reader’s narrative sense making operations may travel between art and the everyday, from fiction to life and back. We argue that the cognitively inspired narrative studies need to pair up with linguistically oriented narratology to gain the necessary semiotic sensitivity to the forms and modes of narrative sense making. Narratology, in turn, needs to explore in detail what it is in the narrative form that enables it to function as a tool for reaching out and making sense of the unfamiliar. In our view, reading fictional narratives such as “The Scar” can help in learning and adopting linguistic resources and story patterns from fiction to our everyday sense making efforts.
叙事模式的同一性与差异性与叙事意义建构——以拉姆齐·坎贝尔的《伤痕》为例
摘要本文从历史和概念的角度探讨了叙事研究的基本问题和叙事的定义,以绘制不同叙事学之间的地形。重点放在小说如何与我们生活的其他领域相互作用的问题上,或者更具体地说,阅读小说如何涉及并影响我们的日常意义创造操作。英国恐怖作家拉姆齐·坎贝尔(Ramsey Campbell, 1946年出生)的短篇小说《伤疤》(The Scar, 1967)将被用作一个测试案例,以展示叙事模式的表现和读者的叙事意义制造操作如何在艺术和日常之间,从小说到生活,再回到现实。我们认为认知启发的叙事研究需要与语言导向的叙事学相结合,以获得对叙事意义形成形式和模式的必要的符号学敏感性。反过来,叙事学需要详细探索,在叙事形式中,是什么使它能够作为一种工具,去接触和理解不熟悉的事物。在我们看来,阅读像《伤疤》这样的虚构叙事可以帮助我们学习和采用小说中的语言资源和故事模式,并将其运用到我们日常的理解努力中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信