La reforma neocolonial de la plaza de Armas. Modernización urbana y patrimonio arquitectónico en Lima, 1901-1952

Horacio Ramos
{"title":"La reforma neocolonial de la plaza de Armas. Modernización urbana y patrimonio arquitectónico en Lima, 1901-1952","authors":"Horacio Ramos","doi":"10.18800/HISTORICA.201601.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay illustrates how the debates surrounding the neo-colonial redevelopment of Lima’s Plaza de Armas (1940-1952) altered perceptions of the city’s urban modernization and architectural heritage. Analyzing projects dating back to the turn of the 20th century reveals that the redevelopment was part of a series of urban interventions involving the destruction of architectural heritage and the construction of major avenues and buildings. The promoters of functionalism criticized the redevelopment, causing this type of urban intervention and the neo-colonial style as «anachronistic».","PeriodicalId":88251,"journal":{"name":"Historica","volume":"35 1","pages":"102-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/HISTORICA.201601.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay illustrates how the debates surrounding the neo-colonial redevelopment of Lima’s Plaza de Armas (1940-1952) altered perceptions of the city’s urban modernization and architectural heritage. Analyzing projects dating back to the turn of the 20th century reveals that the redevelopment was part of a series of urban interventions involving the destruction of architectural heritage and the construction of major avenues and buildings. The promoters of functionalism criticized the redevelopment, causing this type of urban intervention and the neo-colonial style as «anachronistic».
阿马斯广场的新殖民主义改革。1901-1952年利马的城市现代化和建筑遗产
本文阐述了围绕利马阿玛斯广场(1940-1952)的新殖民主义重建的争论如何改变了人们对城市现代化和建筑遗产的看法。分析20世纪初的项目,发现重建是一系列城市干预的一部分,涉及建筑遗产的破坏和主要道路和建筑物的建设。功能主义的推动者批评了重建,认为这种类型的城市干预和新殖民主义风格是“不合时宜的”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信