Incidence of post-dural puncture headache: A comparison of quinckes' versus whitacres' spinal needles

J. Irkal, S. Reddy, Diddi Krishn, A. Bhardwaj
{"title":"Incidence of post-dural puncture headache: A comparison of quinckes' versus whitacres' spinal needles","authors":"J. Irkal, S. Reddy, Diddi Krishn, A. Bhardwaj","doi":"10.4103/kaj.kaj_2_17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Repeated attempts at insertion, block failure, and post-dural puncture headache are the most common drawbacks of spinal anesthesia. This study was designed to re-evaluate these untoward effects of subarachnoid block. The primary aim of the study is to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache with 25-gauge Quincke's and Whitacre's spinal needles. The secondary objectives include assessing the difference in attempt rate and failure rate during subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: In this randomized prospective study, 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II adult patients of both sex undergoing surgery below umbilicus under subarachnoid block were assigned in to two equal groups of 50 each; they were to receive spinal anesthesia either with Quincke's (group QC) or Whitacre's (group WP) spinal needles. The incidence of post-dural puncture headache, number of attempts required for successful insertion, and frequency of failed subarachnoid block were recorded. Data obtained were analyzed using t-test and Chi-square test. A value of P < 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant. Results: All the 100 patients completed the study. Significantly high rate (P = 0.009) of post-dural puncture headache was recorded in Quincke group (18%) as compared to Whitacre group (2%). In addition, the number of attempts required were less with Whitacre's needle; however, no statically significant association between the type of the needle, attempt rate, and failure rate during spinal anesthesia could be detected (P = 0.2425). Conclusion: Overall to reduce the number of attempts and the incidence of post-dural puncture headache, Whitacre's 25-gauge spinal needle has better option than Quincke's 25-gauge spinal needle for subarachnoid block.","PeriodicalId":17751,"journal":{"name":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/kaj.kaj_2_17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Repeated attempts at insertion, block failure, and post-dural puncture headache are the most common drawbacks of spinal anesthesia. This study was designed to re-evaluate these untoward effects of subarachnoid block. The primary aim of the study is to compare the incidence of post-dural puncture headache with 25-gauge Quincke's and Whitacre's spinal needles. The secondary objectives include assessing the difference in attempt rate and failure rate during subarachnoid block. Materials and Methods: In this randomized prospective study, 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II adult patients of both sex undergoing surgery below umbilicus under subarachnoid block were assigned in to two equal groups of 50 each; they were to receive spinal anesthesia either with Quincke's (group QC) or Whitacre's (group WP) spinal needles. The incidence of post-dural puncture headache, number of attempts required for successful insertion, and frequency of failed subarachnoid block were recorded. Data obtained were analyzed using t-test and Chi-square test. A value of P < 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant. Results: All the 100 patients completed the study. Significantly high rate (P = 0.009) of post-dural puncture headache was recorded in Quincke group (18%) as compared to Whitacre group (2%). In addition, the number of attempts required were less with Whitacre's needle; however, no statically significant association between the type of the needle, attempt rate, and failure rate during spinal anesthesia could be detected (P = 0.2425). Conclusion: Overall to reduce the number of attempts and the incidence of post-dural puncture headache, Whitacre's 25-gauge spinal needle has better option than Quincke's 25-gauge spinal needle for subarachnoid block.
硬脊膜穿刺后头痛的发生率:quinckes与whitacres脊髓针的比较
背景:反复尝试插入、阻滞失败和硬脊膜穿刺后头痛是脊髓麻醉最常见的缺点。本研究旨在重新评估蛛网膜下腔阻滞的不良影响。该研究的主要目的是比较25号昆克和惠塔克脊髓针对硬脊膜穿刺后头痛的发生率。次要目的包括评估蛛网膜下腔阻滞中尝试率和失败率的差异。材料和方法:在这项随机前瞻性研究中,100名美国麻醉师学会物理状态I和II的成人患者在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下接受脐下手术,被分为两组,每组50人;采用Quincke (QC组)或Whitacre (WP组)脊髓针进行脊髓麻醉。记录硬脑膜穿刺后头痛的发生率、成功插入所需的次数和蛛网膜下腔阻滞失败的频率。所得资料采用t检验和卡方检验进行分析。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:100例患者全部完成研究。Quincke组硬膜穿刺后头痛发生率(18%)明显高于Whitacre组(2%)(P = 0.009)。此外,使用惠塔克针所需的尝试次数更少;然而,在脊髓麻醉过程中,针头类型、尝试率和失败率之间没有统计学意义上的显著关联(P = 0.2425)。结论:总的来说,在减少硬膜穿刺后头痛的次数和发生率方面,Whitacre 25号脊髓针优于Quincke 25号脊髓针用于蛛网膜下腔阻滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信