The use of data for planning and service improvement in Tanzanian Primary healthcare facilities: Experience from Star Rating Assessment

Q1 Multidisciplinary
E. Kinyenje, C. Germán, T. Yahya, J. Hokororo, S. Nungu, M. Mohamed, M. Degeh, O. Nassoro, R. Bahegwa, Y. Msigwa, R. Ngowi, L. Marandu, S. Mwaisengela, E. Eliakimu
{"title":"The use of data for planning and service improvement in Tanzanian Primary healthcare facilities: Experience from Star Rating Assessment","authors":"E. Kinyenje, C. Germán, T. Yahya, J. Hokororo, S. Nungu, M. Mohamed, M. Degeh, O. Nassoro, R. Bahegwa, Y. Msigwa, R. Ngowi, L. Marandu, S. Mwaisengela, E. Eliakimu","doi":"10.1101/2022.06.03.22275952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The use of data for planning and improving healthcare delivery is sub-optimal among developing countries. In 2015, Tanzania started to implement Star Rating Assessment (SRA) process for primary health care (PHC) facilities to improve various dimensions of quality of services, including the use of data. We aimed at assessing the extent and predictors of data use in Tanzanian PHC facilities. Methodology We used the most current national SRA data available in DHIS2 that was collected in 2017/2018 from all 7,289 PHC facilities. A facility was considered using data if gained 80% of the allocated scores. Other dependent variables were the three components that together contribute to the use of data [If PHC facility has Health Management Information systems (HMIS) functional, disseminate information, and has proper medical records]. We determined the association between data use and facility ownership status (public or private), location of the facility (rural or urban) and facility service level (dispensary, health centre or hospital). Results are presented as proportions of facilities that qualified for data use and the three components. The associations are reported in Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 6,663(91.4%) PHC facilities met our inclusion criteria for analysis. Among the facilities: 1,198(18.0%) had used data for planning and services improvement; 3,792(56.9%) had functional HMIS; 1,752(26.3%) had disseminated data; and 631(9.5%) had proper medical records. PHC facilities that are publicly owned (AOR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.05-1.48) and those at higher service level [hospitals (AOR 1.77; 95% CI: 1.27-2.46) and health centres (AOR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.15-1.68) compared to dispensaries] were more likely to use data. Conclusion The use of facility data for planning and services improvement in Tanzanian PHC facilities is low, and much effort needs to be targeted at privately-owned and low-level PHC facilities.","PeriodicalId":37126,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology","volume":"178 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.03.22275952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The use of data for planning and improving healthcare delivery is sub-optimal among developing countries. In 2015, Tanzania started to implement Star Rating Assessment (SRA) process for primary health care (PHC) facilities to improve various dimensions of quality of services, including the use of data. We aimed at assessing the extent and predictors of data use in Tanzanian PHC facilities. Methodology We used the most current national SRA data available in DHIS2 that was collected in 2017/2018 from all 7,289 PHC facilities. A facility was considered using data if gained 80% of the allocated scores. Other dependent variables were the three components that together contribute to the use of data [If PHC facility has Health Management Information systems (HMIS) functional, disseminate information, and has proper medical records]. We determined the association between data use and facility ownership status (public or private), location of the facility (rural or urban) and facility service level (dispensary, health centre or hospital). Results are presented as proportions of facilities that qualified for data use and the three components. The associations are reported in Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 6,663(91.4%) PHC facilities met our inclusion criteria for analysis. Among the facilities: 1,198(18.0%) had used data for planning and services improvement; 3,792(56.9%) had functional HMIS; 1,752(26.3%) had disseminated data; and 631(9.5%) had proper medical records. PHC facilities that are publicly owned (AOR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.05-1.48) and those at higher service level [hospitals (AOR 1.77; 95% CI: 1.27-2.46) and health centres (AOR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.15-1.68) compared to dispensaries] were more likely to use data. Conclusion The use of facility data for planning and services improvement in Tanzanian PHC facilities is low, and much effort needs to be targeted at privately-owned and low-level PHC facilities.
数据用于坦桑尼亚初级保健设施的规划和服务改进:来自星级评估的经验
背景:在发展中国家,利用数据规划和改善医疗保健服务的情况并不理想。2015年,坦桑尼亚开始对初级保健设施实施星级评估程序,以改善服务质量的各个方面,包括数据的使用。我们的目的是评估坦桑尼亚初级保健设施数据使用的程度和预测因素。我们使用了DHIS2中最新的国家SRA数据,这些数据是在2017/2018年从所有7289个PHC设施中收集的。如果获得分配分数的80%,则认为该设施使用数据。其他因变量是共同促进数据使用的三个组成部分[如果初级保健设施具有健康管理信息系统(HMIS)功能,传播信息,并有适当的医疗记录]。我们确定了数据使用与设施所有权状态(公共或私人)、设施位置(农村或城市)和设施服务水平(药房、保健中心或医院)之间的关联。结果显示为符合数据使用条件的设施的比例和三个组成部分。这些关联以校正优势比(AOR)报告,95%可信区间(CI)。结果6663家(91.4%)PHC机构符合纳入标准。其中:1198家(18.0%)利用数据进行规划和服务改进;3792例(56.9%)HMIS功能正常;1752个(26.3%)有数据传播;631人(9.5%)有适当的医疗记录。公立初级保健设施(AOR 1.25;95% CI: 1.05-1.48)和服务水平较高的医院(AOR 1.77;95%置信区间:1.27-2.46)和保健中心(AOR 1.39;(95% CI: 1.15-1.68)[与药房相比]更倾向于使用数据。结论坦桑尼亚初级卫生保健设施数据用于规划和服务改进的利用率较低,需要针对私营和低水平初级卫生保健设施做出更多努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信