4CPS-382 Impact of a clinical pharmacist at transition of care: a prospective study in an orthopaedic ward of a regional hospital

C. Reimer, N. Gillard, A. Sennesael, E. Deflandre, P. Anrys, S. Demaret
{"title":"4CPS-382 Impact of a clinical pharmacist at transition of care: a prospective study in an orthopaedic ward of a regional hospital","authors":"C. Reimer, N. Gillard, A. Sennesael, E. Deflandre, P. Anrys, S. Demaret","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Transition of care (TOC) is a high risk period for medication errors. Discrepancies and incomplete medication information are common on hospital admission and discharge, potentially leading to drug related problems and adverse drug events at TOC. Aim and objectives The objectives of this study were to identify discrepancies on admission and at discharge and to detect the completeness of medication information in the discharge documents; and to assess the potential clinical impact of discrepancies. Material and methods A 4 week prospective interventional study was carried out in a 29 bed orthopaedic surgery ward of a regional hospital. On admission, the pharmacist compared his best possible medication history to previous medication histories and to prescriptions to identify discrepancies. They were classified by type, ATC classes and level of risk for the patient. Risk was evaluated by one physician and one clinical pharmacist assessing potential clinical impact and likelihood of occurrence. At discharge, completeness of medication related information in discharge letters and prescriptions was analysed. Discrepancies between inpatient treatment and discharge prescriptions were reported and their clinical impact was evaluated. Results 94 patients were included. On admission, 331 discrepancies with the previously recorded medication history were observed in 81 patients (92%). Regarding prescriptions, there were 97 unintentional discrepancies that impacted 41 patients (43.6%). Among these, 38 discrepancies (39.2%) were classified as high or extreme risk and involved psycholeptics, antidiabetic drugs and antithrombotic agents. Omission was the most common discrepancy. At discharge, 36 patients (40.4%) had at least a high or extreme risk discrepancy. Patients had a risk of treatment duplication. Antithrombotic agents were a major class in which patients were at extreme risk. Only 60% of drugs prescribed were found in the discharge letters. Conclusion and relevance Discrepancies and incomplete medication information are real issues at TOC. To improve patient care, the hospital pharmacist is a suitable and valuable healthcare professional. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance Transition of care (TOC) is a high risk period for medication errors. Discrepancies and incomplete medication information are common on hospital admission and discharge, potentially leading to drug related problems and adverse drug events at TOC. Aim and objectives The objectives of this study were to identify discrepancies on admission and at discharge and to detect the completeness of medication information in the discharge documents; and to assess the potential clinical impact of discrepancies. Material and methods A 4 week prospective interventional study was carried out in a 29 bed orthopaedic surgery ward of a regional hospital. On admission, the pharmacist compared his best possible medication history to previous medication histories and to prescriptions to identify discrepancies. They were classified by type, ATC classes and level of risk for the patient. Risk was evaluated by one physician and one clinical pharmacist assessing potential clinical impact and likelihood of occurrence. At discharge, completeness of medication related information in discharge letters and prescriptions was analysed. Discrepancies between inpatient treatment and discharge prescriptions were reported and their clinical impact was evaluated. Results 94 patients were included. On admission, 331 discrepancies with the previously recorded medication history were observed in 81 patients (92%). Regarding prescriptions, there were 97 unintentional discrepancies that impacted 41 patients (43.6%). Among these, 38 discrepancies (39.2%) were classified as high or extreme risk and involved psycholeptics, antidiabetic drugs and antithrombotic agents. Omission was the most common discrepancy. At discharge, 36 patients (40.4%) had at least a high or extreme risk discrepancy. Patients had a risk of treatment duplication. Antithrombotic agents were a major class in which patients were at extreme risk. Only 60% of drugs prescribed were found in the discharge letters. Conclusion and relevance Discrepancies and incomplete medication information are real issues at TOC. To improve patient care, the hospital pharmacist is a suitable and valuable healthcare professional. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
临床药师在转诊过程中的影响:一项地区医院骨科病房的前瞻性研究
背景与重要性护理过渡期(TOC)是药物差错的高危期。不一致和不完整的用药信息在住院和出院时很常见,可能导致TOC的药物相关问题和药物不良事件。目的和目的本研究的目的是确定入院和出院时的差异,并检测出院文件中用药信息的完整性;并评估差异的潜在临床影响。材料与方法在某地区医院29张床位的骨科病房进行为期4周的前瞻性介入研究。入院时,药剂师将他最好的用药史与以前的用药史和处方进行比较,以确定差异。他们根据类型、ATC等级和患者的风险水平进行分类。风险评估由一名医师和一名临床药师评估潜在的临床影响和发生的可能性。出院时,对出院信和处方中用药相关信息的完整性进行分析。报告了住院治疗和出院处方之间的差异,并评估了其临床影响。结果共纳入94例患者。入院时,81例患者(92%)与先前记录的用药史有331项差异。在处方方面,有97个非故意差异,影响了41名患者(43.6%)。其中38例(39.2%)为高危或极危,涉及抗精神病药物、抗糖尿病药物和抗血栓药物。遗漏是最常见的差异。出院时,36例患者(40.4%)至少存在高或极端风险差异。患者有重复治疗的风险。抗血栓药物是患者处于极端危险的主要类别。只有60%的处方药物在出院信中被发现。结论与相关性用药信息不一致和不完整是TOC的现实问题。为了改善病人的护理,医院药剂师是一个合适的和有价值的医疗保健专业人员。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信