Co-creating the future of heritage in-the-making: empirical evidence from community deliberation at Naxos Island, Greece

IF 2 1区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Dragouni, Stelios Lekakis
{"title":"Co-creating the future of heritage in-the-making: empirical evidence from community deliberation at Naxos Island, Greece","authors":"M. Dragouni, Stelios Lekakis","doi":"10.1080/13527258.2023.2181376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although participatory heritage has become a ‘buzzword’ of cultural policy, it remains a challenging field for related practice. Set at Naxos Island, Greece, the research presented in this article forms part of a bigger project exploring the values and meaning-making processes in rural landscape, currently at risk of neglect and over-tourism. Here, we test the usability of the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) as a tool for allowing citizens to deliberate and devise community desirable actions for the protection and invigoration of rural monuments. As we discuss, apart from enriching our participatory ‘toolbox’, NGT can offer some insight into bottom-up processes of valuing the past and producing its historicity. Furthermore, our workshop participants initiate a dialogue, wherein they advocate for ‘hands-on’ solutions, which although fit largely with standard heritage management practice, are rearranged in alternative hierarchies; an atypical organisation of actions that reflects community aspirations to preserve a yet unsettled type of heritage that is currently ‘in-the-making’. This supports our main theoretical argument that participatory approaches shall not be treated instrumentally but positioned as part of a wider prefigurative politics project to resist dominant conservative and positivist processes of heritagisation.","PeriodicalId":47807,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"294 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2181376","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although participatory heritage has become a ‘buzzword’ of cultural policy, it remains a challenging field for related practice. Set at Naxos Island, Greece, the research presented in this article forms part of a bigger project exploring the values and meaning-making processes in rural landscape, currently at risk of neglect and over-tourism. Here, we test the usability of the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) as a tool for allowing citizens to deliberate and devise community desirable actions for the protection and invigoration of rural monuments. As we discuss, apart from enriching our participatory ‘toolbox’, NGT can offer some insight into bottom-up processes of valuing the past and producing its historicity. Furthermore, our workshop participants initiate a dialogue, wherein they advocate for ‘hands-on’ solutions, which although fit largely with standard heritage management practice, are rearranged in alternative hierarchies; an atypical organisation of actions that reflects community aspirations to preserve a yet unsettled type of heritage that is currently ‘in-the-making’. This supports our main theoretical argument that participatory approaches shall not be treated instrumentally but positioned as part of a wider prefigurative politics project to resist dominant conservative and positivist processes of heritagisation.
共同创造正在形成的遗产的未来:来自希腊纳克索斯岛社区审议的经验证据
虽然参与式遗产已经成为文化政策的“流行语”,但它仍然是一个具有挑战性的实践领域。以希腊纳克索斯岛为背景,本文中提出的研究是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目探索乡村景观的价值和意义创造过程,目前面临被忽视和过度旅游的风险。在这里,我们测试了名义群体技术(NGT)的可用性,作为一种工具,允许公民考虑和设计社区理想的行动,以保护和振兴农村纪念碑。正如我们所讨论的,除了丰富我们的参与性“工具箱”之外,NGT还可以为自下而上的评估过去并产生其历史性的过程提供一些见解。此外,我们的研讨会参与者发起了一场对话,他们提倡“动手”的解决方案,尽管这些解决方案在很大程度上符合标准的遗产管理实践,但它们在不同的层次结构中被重新安排;这是一个非典型的行动组织,反映了社区对保护目前“正在制作”的尚未确定的遗产类型的愿望。这支持了我们的主要理论论点,即参与性方法不应被视为工具,而应被定位为更广泛的先驱性政治项目的一部分,以抵制占主导地位的保守主义和实证主义的遗产化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Heritage Studies ( IJHS ) is the interdisciplinary academic, refereed journal for scholars and practitioners with a common interest in heritage. The Journal encourages debate over the nature and meaning of heritage as well as its links to memory, identities and place. Articles may include issues emerging from Heritage Studies, Museum Studies, History, Tourism Studies, Sociology, Anthropology, Memory Studies, Cultural Geography, Law, Cultural Studies, and Interpretation and Design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信