Comparison of Propranolol and Amitriptyline as Monotherapy for Migraine Prophylaxis

M. Islam, Dahlia Sultana, M. Shahi, M. S. Hassan
{"title":"Comparison of Propranolol and Amitriptyline as Monotherapy for Migraine Prophylaxis","authors":"M. Islam, Dahlia Sultana, M. Shahi, M. S. Hassan","doi":"10.3329/jcamr.v6i2.42698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several drugs are used individually for migraine prophylaxis. \nObjective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the propranolol and amitriptyline as monotherapy for the prophylaxis of migraine. \nMethodology: This randomized control trial was conducted in headache clinic at Banghabandhu Sheikh Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2012 to June 2014 for a period of two (02) years. Migraine patients with or without aura of 16 to 50 years of age, patients not on any prophylactic medication were included for this study. Patients meeting all the criteria was randomized group A who were treated with Amitriptyline and group B who were treated with propranolol. Patients was followed for a three months period during which they was instructed to maintain a headache diary. The primary outcome evaluated was the proportion of patients in each group that achieved a 50% reduction in the number of days with headache. \nResult: A total 80 adult patients were selected. During 1st visit among the patients duration of pain 1 to 4 hours (2.5.0%), 5 to 8 hours (13.3%) 9 to 12 hours (35.0%) and above 13 hours (22.5%) in group A were recorded; however, in group B, duration of pain 1 to 4 hours 1(2.5), 5-8 hours 16(13.3%), 9-12 hours 19(47.5) and above 13 hours 4(10.0) (p>0.05). In group A, no adverse effect was found 26(65.0%), drowsiness 6 (15.0%), dryness of mouth 6(15.0%), constipation 2(5.0%), fatigue and bradycardia were not found. In group B, no adverse effect was found 29(72.5%), drowsiness, dryness of mouth and constipation were not found, fatigue and bradycardia were 7(17.5%) and 4(10.0%). \nConclusion: In conclusion number of attack and headache before treatment gradually decrease in subsequent follow up in both groups. \nJournal of Current and Advance Medical Research 2019;6(2):77-82","PeriodicalId":15413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jcamr.v6i2.42698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Several drugs are used individually for migraine prophylaxis. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the propranolol and amitriptyline as monotherapy for the prophylaxis of migraine. Methodology: This randomized control trial was conducted in headache clinic at Banghabandhu Sheikh Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2012 to June 2014 for a period of two (02) years. Migraine patients with or without aura of 16 to 50 years of age, patients not on any prophylactic medication were included for this study. Patients meeting all the criteria was randomized group A who were treated with Amitriptyline and group B who were treated with propranolol. Patients was followed for a three months period during which they was instructed to maintain a headache diary. The primary outcome evaluated was the proportion of patients in each group that achieved a 50% reduction in the number of days with headache. Result: A total 80 adult patients were selected. During 1st visit among the patients duration of pain 1 to 4 hours (2.5.0%), 5 to 8 hours (13.3%) 9 to 12 hours (35.0%) and above 13 hours (22.5%) in group A were recorded; however, in group B, duration of pain 1 to 4 hours 1(2.5), 5-8 hours 16(13.3%), 9-12 hours 19(47.5) and above 13 hours 4(10.0) (p>0.05). In group A, no adverse effect was found 26(65.0%), drowsiness 6 (15.0%), dryness of mouth 6(15.0%), constipation 2(5.0%), fatigue and bradycardia were not found. In group B, no adverse effect was found 29(72.5%), drowsiness, dryness of mouth and constipation were not found, fatigue and bradycardia were 7(17.5%) and 4(10.0%). Conclusion: In conclusion number of attack and headache before treatment gradually decrease in subsequent follow up in both groups. Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research 2019;6(2):77-82
心得安与阿米替林单药预防偏头痛的比较
背景:几种药物被单独用于偏头痛预防。目的:比较普萘洛尔和阿米替林单药对偏头痛的预防作用。方法:本随机对照试验于2012年7月至2014年6月在孟加拉国达卡的Banghabandhu Sheikh医科大学(BSMMU)头痛门诊进行,为期2年。16 - 50岁的偏头痛患者有或没有先兆,没有服用任何预防性药物的患者被纳入这项研究。符合所有标准的患者随机分为A组(阿米替林治疗)和B组(心得安治疗)。研究人员对患者进行了为期三个月的随访,在此期间,他们被要求记录头痛日记。评估的主要结局是每组患者中头痛天数减少50%的比例。结果:共选择80例成人患者。A组患者首次就诊时疼痛持续时间分别为1 ~ 4小时(2.5.0%)、5 ~ 8小时(13.3%)、9 ~ 12小时(35.0%)、13小时以上(22.5%);B组疼痛持续时间分别为1 ~ 4小时1(2.5%)、5 ~ 8小时16(13.3%)、9 ~ 12小时19(47.5%)和13小时以上(10.0%)(p < 0.05)。A组无不良反应26例(65.0%),嗜睡6例(15.0%),口干6例(15.0%),便秘2例(5.0%),无乏力、心动过缓。B组无不良反应29例(72.5%),未见嗜睡、口干、便秘,乏力、心动过缓7例(17.5%)、4例(10.0%)。结论:两组患者治疗前发作次数和头痛次数均逐渐减少。现代医学研究进展,2019;6(2):77-82
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信