Two Decades of Business Competition Law: How has Indonesian Competition Law Transformed?

Dennis Wye Keen Khon, Muhammad Iqbal Baiquni, Waspiah Waspiah
{"title":"Two Decades of Business Competition Law: How has Indonesian Competition Law Transformed?","authors":"Dennis Wye Keen Khon, Muhammad Iqbal Baiquni, Waspiah Waspiah","doi":"10.15294/jpcl.v7i1.44355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focuses on the development of competition law in Indonesia, specifically examining the role and impact of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, also known as the Business Competition Law. The objective of this research is to provide an overview of the various changes in business competition law in Indonesia, particularly the establishment of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU), responsible for enforcing the law against business competition violations committed by companies or individuals. Additionally, this article will compare Indonesian competition law with that of other countries, such as Australia and Singapore. The research adopts two main methods: a statute approach and a comparative approach. The statute approach involves analyzing three statutory regulations: Law No. 5 of 1999 (Indonesia), Australia Competition and Consumer Amendment Act 2013 (Australia), and Singapore Competition Act 2004 (Singapore). The findings of this study reveal two key weaknesses in Indonesia's Business Competition Law. First, there are deficiencies in both the material and formal aspects of determining prohibitions per se or employing the rule of reason theory. Secondly, there are concerns related to the definition of dominant market positions, necessitating a review of the Business Competition Law to align it with best practices. Additionally, there are issues regarding the neutrality of KPPU as a Quasi-Judicial institution, and the need to safeguard the rights of the reported parties during the judicial process at KPPU. Furthermore, a legal comparison with Australia and Singapore highlights that Indonesia's Business Competition Law lags behind in several areas, resulting in a legal vacuum concerning Mergers and Acquisitions Regulations, Horizontal and Vertical Agreements, Dispute Resolution, and Consumer Protection. In conclusion, this research emphasizes the significance of robust competition laws in promoting fair business competition, economic growth, and foreign investment. It sheds light on the weaknesses of Indonesia's current Business Competition Law and suggests potential areas for improvement based on a comparison with competition laws in Australia and Singapore. Addressing these issues would strengthen Indonesia's competitive landscape and foster a more conducive business environment.","PeriodicalId":32860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Private and Commercial Law","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Private and Commercial Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v7i1.44355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research focuses on the development of competition law in Indonesia, specifically examining the role and impact of Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, also known as the Business Competition Law. The objective of this research is to provide an overview of the various changes in business competition law in Indonesia, particularly the establishment of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU), responsible for enforcing the law against business competition violations committed by companies or individuals. Additionally, this article will compare Indonesian competition law with that of other countries, such as Australia and Singapore. The research adopts two main methods: a statute approach and a comparative approach. The statute approach involves analyzing three statutory regulations: Law No. 5 of 1999 (Indonesia), Australia Competition and Consumer Amendment Act 2013 (Australia), and Singapore Competition Act 2004 (Singapore). The findings of this study reveal two key weaknesses in Indonesia's Business Competition Law. First, there are deficiencies in both the material and formal aspects of determining prohibitions per se or employing the rule of reason theory. Secondly, there are concerns related to the definition of dominant market positions, necessitating a review of the Business Competition Law to align it with best practices. Additionally, there are issues regarding the neutrality of KPPU as a Quasi-Judicial institution, and the need to safeguard the rights of the reported parties during the judicial process at KPPU. Furthermore, a legal comparison with Australia and Singapore highlights that Indonesia's Business Competition Law lags behind in several areas, resulting in a legal vacuum concerning Mergers and Acquisitions Regulations, Horizontal and Vertical Agreements, Dispute Resolution, and Consumer Protection. In conclusion, this research emphasizes the significance of robust competition laws in promoting fair business competition, economic growth, and foreign investment. It sheds light on the weaknesses of Indonesia's current Business Competition Law and suggests potential areas for improvement based on a comparison with competition laws in Australia and Singapore. Addressing these issues would strengthen Indonesia's competitive landscape and foster a more conducive business environment.
二十年商业竞争法:印尼竞争法如何转型?
本研究的重点是印度尼西亚竞争法的发展,特别是1999年第5号法关于禁止垄断行为和不正当商业竞争的作用和影响,也被称为商业竞争法。本研究的目的是概述印度尼西亚商业竞争法的各种变化,特别是设立了商业竞争监督委员会(KPPU),负责执行法律,打击公司或个人违反商业竞争的行为。此外,本文将比较印度尼西亚的竞争法与其他国家,如澳大利亚和新加坡的竞争法。研究主要采用两种方法:成文法法和比较法。成文法方法包括分析三个法定法规:1999年第5号法(印度尼西亚),2013年澳大利亚竞争和消费者修正法(澳大利亚)和2004年新加坡竞争法(新加坡)。本研究的结果揭示了印度尼西亚商业竞争法的两个关键弱点。首先,在确定禁令本身或采用理性规则理论的物质和形式方面都存在缺陷。其次,对市场支配地位的定义存在一些担忧,需要对《商业竞争法》进行审查,使其与最佳做法保持一致。此外,作为准司法机构,司法机关的中立性也存在问题,在司法程序中需要保障被举报当事人的权利。此外,与澳大利亚和新加坡的法律比较表明,印度尼西亚的《商业竞争法》在若干领域落后,导致在并购法规、横向和纵向协议、争议解决和消费者保护方面存在法律真空。总之,本研究强调了强有力的竞争法在促进公平商业竞争、经济增长和外国投资方面的重要性。报告揭示了印尼现行《商业竞争法》的弱点,并在与澳大利亚和新加坡竞争法进行比较的基础上,提出了可能改进的领域。解决这些问题将加强印尼的竞争格局,营造更有利的商业环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信