Evaluation of the Saturating Fluid Effect on the Composite Materials Elastic-Strength Properties

V. Pavlov, N. Pavlyukov, A. Krasnikov, M. Lushev, T. Eltsov
{"title":"Evaluation of the Saturating Fluid Effect on the Composite Materials Elastic-Strength Properties","authors":"V. Pavlov, N. Pavlyukov, A. Krasnikov, M. Lushev, T. Eltsov","doi":"10.2118/196898-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Effective assessment of the stress-strain state of the near wellbore zone is one of the key problems in the process of modeling the stability of the wellbore walls. Drilling mud infiltrates permeable rocks during the drilling process. This causes a change in the elastic-strength properties of rocks and, accordingly, the redistribution of tension around the well. At present, there are no computational methods that take into account the effect of saturation fluids on the change in the elastic-strength properties. A unified system approach for the implementation of this type of research when changing infiltration fluids is not developed yet.\n In this paper, we study the effect of various types of drilling mud on the elastic-strength properties of core samples, which are equivalents of rocks (composite samples made of different sand and clay cement facies). Measurements of porosity, acoustic properties, ultimate strength for uniaxial compression, and static Young's modulus at different samples saturation are made. Studies of the elastic-strength properties of the samples are performed after 48 and 168 hours soaked in the drilling fluids. According to the study, the relative change in the dynamic Young's modulus with various sample saturation is 13.4-27.7%, the static young modulus (compression) is 19-40%, the dynamic Poisson ratio is 1.4-14.6% and the uniaxial compression strength is 28-35%. The data obtained indicate a significant effect of the saturating fluid on the elastic and strength properties of materials.\n A numerical one-dimensional simulation of the stability of the borehole walls is performed, taking into account the type of saturating fluid and the relative change in the elastic-strength properties. The results indicate a change in the stability of the wellbore walls; the indicators of the change in the equivalents of the collapse gradient and hydraulic fracturing are 0.2-0.3 g / cm3. A change in Young's modulus of 30% affects the design parameters of a hydraulic fracturing fracture – by width up to 100%, by half length up to 50%.","PeriodicalId":10977,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, October 23, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196898-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective assessment of the stress-strain state of the near wellbore zone is one of the key problems in the process of modeling the stability of the wellbore walls. Drilling mud infiltrates permeable rocks during the drilling process. This causes a change in the elastic-strength properties of rocks and, accordingly, the redistribution of tension around the well. At present, there are no computational methods that take into account the effect of saturation fluids on the change in the elastic-strength properties. A unified system approach for the implementation of this type of research when changing infiltration fluids is not developed yet. In this paper, we study the effect of various types of drilling mud on the elastic-strength properties of core samples, which are equivalents of rocks (composite samples made of different sand and clay cement facies). Measurements of porosity, acoustic properties, ultimate strength for uniaxial compression, and static Young's modulus at different samples saturation are made. Studies of the elastic-strength properties of the samples are performed after 48 and 168 hours soaked in the drilling fluids. According to the study, the relative change in the dynamic Young's modulus with various sample saturation is 13.4-27.7%, the static young modulus (compression) is 19-40%, the dynamic Poisson ratio is 1.4-14.6% and the uniaxial compression strength is 28-35%. The data obtained indicate a significant effect of the saturating fluid on the elastic and strength properties of materials. A numerical one-dimensional simulation of the stability of the borehole walls is performed, taking into account the type of saturating fluid and the relative change in the elastic-strength properties. The results indicate a change in the stability of the wellbore walls; the indicators of the change in the equivalents of the collapse gradient and hydraulic fracturing are 0.2-0.3 g / cm3. A change in Young's modulus of 30% affects the design parameters of a hydraulic fracturing fracture – by width up to 100%, by half length up to 50%.
饱和流体对复合材料弹性强度影响的评价
有效评估近井筒区域的应力应变状态是井筒壁稳定性建模过程中的关键问题之一。在钻井过程中,钻井泥浆会渗入渗透性岩石。这导致岩石的弹性强度特性发生变化,相应地,井周围的张力重新分布。目前还没有考虑饱和流体对弹性强度变化影响的计算方法。目前还没有一个统一的系统方法来实施这种改变渗透流体的研究。在本文中,我们研究了不同类型的钻井泥浆对岩心样品的弹性强度特性的影响,岩心样品相当于岩石(由不同的砂和粘土水泥相组成的复合样品)。测量孔隙率、声学特性、单轴压缩极限强度和不同饱和度下的静态杨氏模量。在钻井液中浸泡48小时和168小时后,对样品的弹性强度特性进行了研究。研究表明,不同试样饱和度下动态杨氏模量的相对变化量为13.4 ~ 27.7%,静态杨氏模量(压缩)为19 ~ 40%,动态泊松比为1.4 ~ 14.6%,单轴抗压强度为28 ~ 35%。得到的数据表明,饱和流体对材料的弹性和强度性能有显著影响。考虑饱和流体的类型和弹性强度特性的相对变化,对井壁稳定性进行了一维数值模拟。结果表明,井筒壁的稳定性发生了变化;崩落梯度和水力压裂当量变化指标为0.2 ~ 0.3 g / cm3。杨氏模量30%的变化会影响水力压裂裂缝的设计参数——宽度变化100%,半长变化50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信