PERSEPSI MAHASISWA AKUNTANSI TERHADAP ETIKA PENYUSUNAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN SYARI’AH SESUAI PSAK No. 101

Wasilaturahmi Siregar, Khusnul Hidayah
{"title":"PERSEPSI MAHASISWA AKUNTANSI TERHADAP ETIKA PENYUSUNAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN SYARI’AH SESUAI PSAK No. 101","authors":"Wasilaturahmi Siregar, Khusnul Hidayah","doi":"10.12928/J.REKSA.V2I2.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research to determine differences in accounting students perceptions of the ethics financial shari’ah statement in accordance with SFAS No. 101. The analysis was based on respondents answers were obtained through questionnaires distributed at Private Colleges and Universities Public Islam. Population of this study is that accounting students are in Private Colleges and Universities Public Islam. This study uses purposive sampling method. Samples were taken from six semesters of accounting students and eight who have taken courses Accounting Theory. To test the validity of the data used Pearson correlation, to test the reliability of the data used Cronbach Alpha while the data used to test the normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and the data used to test for differences Independent samples t-test. The results are hypothesis 1, hypothesis 2, hypothesis 4, and 5 are acceptable hypothesis that there are differences in the perception of earnings management, misstatements in the financial statements, cost-benefit, and responsibility to the users of financial statements Shariah between accounting students at university Private Higher Islam and Higher Education General. And hypothesis 3 was rejected, ie there is no difference between the perceptions of disclosure of accounting students in Private Colleges and Universities Public Islam.","PeriodicalId":34792,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Reksa","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Reksa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12928/J.REKSA.V2I2.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research to determine differences in accounting students perceptions of the ethics financial shari’ah statement in accordance with SFAS No. 101. The analysis was based on respondents answers were obtained through questionnaires distributed at Private Colleges and Universities Public Islam. Population of this study is that accounting students are in Private Colleges and Universities Public Islam. This study uses purposive sampling method. Samples were taken from six semesters of accounting students and eight who have taken courses Accounting Theory. To test the validity of the data used Pearson correlation, to test the reliability of the data used Cronbach Alpha while the data used to test the normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and the data used to test for differences Independent samples t-test. The results are hypothesis 1, hypothesis 2, hypothesis 4, and 5 are acceptable hypothesis that there are differences in the perception of earnings management, misstatements in the financial statements, cost-benefit, and responsibility to the users of financial statements Shariah between accounting students at university Private Higher Islam and Higher Education General. And hypothesis 3 was rejected, ie there is no difference between the perceptions of disclosure of accounting students in Private Colleges and Universities Public Islam.
从会计的角度来看
本研究旨在根据SFAS第101号确定会计专业学生对道德财务伊斯兰教法报表的看法差异。该分析是基于受访者通过在私立学院和公立伊斯兰大学分发的问卷获得的答案。本研究的人口是,会计专业的学生都在私立大学和公立伊斯兰教。本研究采用目的性抽样方法。样本取自6个学期的会计专业学生和8个学期的会计理论课程学生。检验数据的效度采用Pearson相关,检验数据的信度采用Cronbach Alpha,检验数据的正态性采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov,检验数据的差异性采用独立样本t检验。结果表明,假设1、假设2、假设4和假设5是可以接受的假设,即私立高等伊斯兰大学和普通高等教育会计专业的学生在盈余管理、财务报表错报、成本效益和财务报表伊斯兰教法使用者的责任方面存在差异。假设3被否定,即私立高校会计专业学生与公立大学会计专业学生对信息披露的认知没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信