Incidence of medication administration errors in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Berhanu Boru Bifftu, Abebe Woldesellassie Tewolde
{"title":"Incidence of medication administration errors in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies","authors":"Berhanu Boru Bifftu, Abebe Woldesellassie Tewolde","doi":"10.22038/PSJ.2019.41804.1237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: In Ethiopia, the overall incidence of medication administration errors (MAEs) has been variously estimated within the range of 16% to 99%; a wide range and difficult to conclude. Thus, this study aimed to assess the pooled incidence of MAEs in Ethiopia. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search in the databases of Pub-Med, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were performed. The quality of study was assessed using criteria adopted from similar studies. Heterogeneity test and evidence of publication bias were assessed. Sensitivity test and trim and fill analysis was also performed. Pooled incidence of MAE was calculated using random effects model. Results: A total of nine studies, including a total of 46,426 medication administrations interventions, were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The frequently reported MAEs were wrong dose, wrong time, and wrong route. The reported error was ranged from 0.1% for wrong medication to 95.8% for omitted drug error. Overall the pooled incidence of MAE was found to be 37.9% (95% CI, 34%-41.9%). It has no evidence of significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p <0.820) and publication bias from the visual inspection of funnel plot and Egger’s test (P =0.481). Conclusion: The incidence of MAE was high. Wrong dose, wrong time, and wrong route were the frequently reported errors. Omission error was the most incident errors. Authors suggested to give more attentions to the rights of medication administration guide, particularly to prevent omission error.","PeriodicalId":16681,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","volume":"24 1","pages":"167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/PSJ.2019.41804.1237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: In Ethiopia, the overall incidence of medication administration errors (MAEs) has been variously estimated within the range of 16% to 99%; a wide range and difficult to conclude. Thus, this study aimed to assess the pooled incidence of MAEs in Ethiopia. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search in the databases of Pub-Med, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were performed. The quality of study was assessed using criteria adopted from similar studies. Heterogeneity test and evidence of publication bias were assessed. Sensitivity test and trim and fill analysis was also performed. Pooled incidence of MAE was calculated using random effects model. Results: A total of nine studies, including a total of 46,426 medication administrations interventions, were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The frequently reported MAEs were wrong dose, wrong time, and wrong route. The reported error was ranged from 0.1% for wrong medication to 95.8% for omitted drug error. Overall the pooled incidence of MAE was found to be 37.9% (95% CI, 34%-41.9%). It has no evidence of significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, p <0.820) and publication bias from the visual inspection of funnel plot and Egger’s test (P =0.481). Conclusion: The incidence of MAE was high. Wrong dose, wrong time, and wrong route were the frequently reported errors. Omission error was the most incident errors. Authors suggested to give more attentions to the rights of medication administration guide, particularly to prevent omission error.
埃塞俄比亚药物管理错误的发生率:观察性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
摘要简介:在埃塞俄比亚,药物管理错误(MAEs)的总体发生率估计在16%至99%的范围内;范围很广,很难下结论。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚MAEs的合并发病率。材料和方法:系统检索pubm - med、Cochrane和Google Scholar数据库的文献。采用类似研究的标准评估研究质量。评估异质性检验和发表偏倚证据。灵敏度测试和修剪填充分析也进行了。采用随机效应模型计算MAE的合并发生率。结果:本系统综述和荟萃分析共纳入9项研究,包括46426项药物管理干预措施。常见的MAEs是错误的剂量、错误的时间和错误的途径。报告的错误率从误用药的0.1%到漏用药的95.8%不等。总的来说,MAE的合并发生率为37.9% (95% CI, 34%-41.9%)。从漏斗图和Egger检验的目视检验(p =0.481)来看,没有证据表明存在显著的异质性(I2 = 0%, p <0.820)和发表偏倚。结论:MAE的发生率较高。错误的剂量、错误的时间和错误的途径是经常报告的错误。遗漏错误是最常见的错误。建议重视用药指导的权利,特别是防止遗漏错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信