The Effect of Suckercide Product and Application Rate on Chemical Topping of Burley Tobacco

M. Richmond, R. Pearce, T. Mark, W. Bailey
{"title":"The Effect of Suckercide Product and Application Rate on Chemical Topping of Burley Tobacco","authors":"M. Richmond, R. Pearce, T. Mark, W. Bailey","doi":"10.3381/tobsci-d-22-00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The act of topping tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) involves the removal of the terminal bud or inflorescence of the tobacco plant. This practice ordinarily is accomplished by manually removing the top of each tobacco plant in an entire field, which is labor intensive and costly. The major objectives for this research were to determine which labeled suckercides could be used effectively for chemical topping of burley tobacco and the effect of suckercide rate on sucker control, yield, leaf quality, maleic hydrazide (MH) residues, and leaf chemistry. A study was initiated at Murray, Princeton, and Lexington, KY that investigated the efficacy of suckercide applications using combinations of MH, butralin, and fatty alcohols (FA). The terminal bud was not well controlled with FA or butralin alone, nor was adequate sucker control or total yield achieved. A significant reduction in total yield and sucker control were observed when plants were chemically topped with MH alone compared to manually topped or chemically topped with a tank mixture of MH and butralin at Princeton only. At the other locations, all chemically topped plants had similar yield to manually topped plants. Our data suggested that chemical topping of burley tobacco with a tank mixture of MH and a local systemic can be an acceptable alternative to manual topping as total yield and leaf quality grade index were not significantly different at any location. Total tobacco-specific nitrosamine (TSNA) content and MH residues were significantly lower with chemical topping treatments in some years and locations.","PeriodicalId":10257,"journal":{"name":"中国烟草科学","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国烟草科学","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3381/tobsci-d-22-00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The act of topping tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) involves the removal of the terminal bud or inflorescence of the tobacco plant. This practice ordinarily is accomplished by manually removing the top of each tobacco plant in an entire field, which is labor intensive and costly. The major objectives for this research were to determine which labeled suckercides could be used effectively for chemical topping of burley tobacco and the effect of suckercide rate on sucker control, yield, leaf quality, maleic hydrazide (MH) residues, and leaf chemistry. A study was initiated at Murray, Princeton, and Lexington, KY that investigated the efficacy of suckercide applications using combinations of MH, butralin, and fatty alcohols (FA). The terminal bud was not well controlled with FA or butralin alone, nor was adequate sucker control or total yield achieved. A significant reduction in total yield and sucker control were observed when plants were chemically topped with MH alone compared to manually topped or chemically topped with a tank mixture of MH and butralin at Princeton only. At the other locations, all chemically topped plants had similar yield to manually topped plants. Our data suggested that chemical topping of burley tobacco with a tank mixture of MH and a local systemic can be an acceptable alternative to manual topping as total yield and leaf quality grade index were not significantly different at any location. Total tobacco-specific nitrosamine (TSNA) content and MH residues were significantly lower with chemical topping treatments in some years and locations.
杀烟剂及其用量对白利烟化学打顶的影响
打顶烟草(Nicotiana tabacum L.)的动作包括去除烟草植株的顶芽或花序。这种做法通常是通过人工去除整个田地里每棵烟草植株的顶部来完成的,这是劳动密集型的,成本很高。本研究的主要目的是确定哪些标记的杀烟剂可以有效地用于白烟的化学打顶,以及杀烟剂用量对白烟控制、产量、叶片品质、马来酰肼残留量和叶片化学性质的影响。普林斯顿的默里和肯塔基州的列克星敦发起了一项研究,调查了使用MH、丁曲林和脂肪醇(FA)组合的杀蝇剂的效果。单独使用FA或butralin不能很好地控制顶芽,也不能达到足够的吸盘控制或总产量。在普林斯顿,与人工灌顶或仅用氢化氢和丁曲林的罐内混合物进行化学灌顶相比,单独用氢化氢进行化学灌顶可显著降低植株的总产量和吸盘控制。在其他地点,所有化学顶的植物与人工顶的植物产量相似。我们的数据表明,在总产量和叶质量等级指数在任何地点都没有显著差异的情况下,用MH和局部系统混合的化学打顶可以替代人工打顶。在某些年份和地点,化学打顶处理显著降低了烟草特异性亚硝胺(TSNA)含量和MH残留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3722
期刊介绍: Chinese Tobacco Science is an academic scientific journal (bimonthly) under the supervision of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China, and sponsored by the Tobacco Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and the Qingzhou Tobacco Research Institute of China National Tobacco Corporation. It was founded in 1979 and is publicly distributed nationwide. The journal mainly publishes academic papers on scientific research results, new production technologies, and modern management in my country's tobacco science research and tobacco production technology. In addition, it also publishes forward-looking review articles in the field of tobacco research. There are columns such as tobacco genetics and breeding, cultivation technology, modulation and processing, physiology and biochemistry, plant protection, review or monograph, quality chemistry, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信