Tocilizumab Effect in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials

Basheer Abdulrahman, W. Aletreby, A. Mady, Alfateh Noor, Mohammed Lhmdi, Fahad Faqihi, A. Alharthy, M. Al-Odat, D. Karakitsos, Z. Memish
{"title":"Tocilizumab Effect in COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials","authors":"Basheer Abdulrahman, W. Aletreby, A. Mady, Alfateh Noor, Mohammed Lhmdi, Fahad Faqihi, A. Alharthy, M. Al-Odat, D. Karakitsos, Z. Memish","doi":"10.1101/2021.03.15.21253581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Since the emergence of the first cases of COVID 19 viral pneumonia late 2019 several studies evaluated the benefits of different treatment modalities. Early in the pandemic, the interleukin 6 (IL 6) receptor antibody Tocilizumab was considered in view of the cytokine release syndrome associated with COVID 19 infection. Several early observational studies showed beneficial effect of treatment with Tocilizumab on mortality, however, results from well designed randomized clinical trials (RCT) were contradicting. Objectives: To perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of RCTs utilizing Tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID 19 pneumonia, with in hospital mortality as a primary objective, while secondary objectives included composite outcome of mortality, intubation, or ICU admission, another secondary outcome was super added infection. Method: This was a random effects model (DerSimonian and Laird) model of relative risk (RR), along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, p values, and forest plots of both primary and secondary outcomes. A fixed effect sensitivity test was performed for the primary outcome, in addition to subgroup and meta regression analyses with predefined criteria. Results: The primary outcome of mortality showed statistically insignificant reduction of mortality with Tocilizumab (RR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8 to 1.01; p = 0.09) although with an unmistakable apparent clinical benefit. There was a significant reduction in the RR of the secondary composite outcome (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.9; p < 0.001), and no difference between groups in super added infection (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.19; p = 0.24). Treatment protocol allowing a second dose was the only significant predictor of improved mortality in the meta regression analysis. Certainty of evidence was reduced to moderate for the primary outcome and the secondary outcome of clinical deterioration, while it was reduced to low for the secondary outcome of super added infection. Conclusion: Moderate certainty of evidence suggest no statistically significant improvement of 28-30 day all cause mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with TCZ, although there may be clinically important value. Moderate certainty of evidence suggest lowered relative risk of a composite outcome of death or clinical deterioration, while, low grade evidence indicate no increase in the risk of super added infection associated with TCZ treatment. A protocol allowing two doses of TCZ shows evidence of improved mortality as compared to a strictly single dose protocol.","PeriodicalId":8282,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Internal Medicine Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Internal Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.15.21253581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Since the emergence of the first cases of COVID 19 viral pneumonia late 2019 several studies evaluated the benefits of different treatment modalities. Early in the pandemic, the interleukin 6 (IL 6) receptor antibody Tocilizumab was considered in view of the cytokine release syndrome associated with COVID 19 infection. Several early observational studies showed beneficial effect of treatment with Tocilizumab on mortality, however, results from well designed randomized clinical trials (RCT) were contradicting. Objectives: To perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of RCTs utilizing Tocilizumab in the treatment of COVID 19 pneumonia, with in hospital mortality as a primary objective, while secondary objectives included composite outcome of mortality, intubation, or ICU admission, another secondary outcome was super added infection. Method: This was a random effects model (DerSimonian and Laird) model of relative risk (RR), along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, p values, and forest plots of both primary and secondary outcomes. A fixed effect sensitivity test was performed for the primary outcome, in addition to subgroup and meta regression analyses with predefined criteria. Results: The primary outcome of mortality showed statistically insignificant reduction of mortality with Tocilizumab (RR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8 to 1.01; p = 0.09) although with an unmistakable apparent clinical benefit. There was a significant reduction in the RR of the secondary composite outcome (RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.9; p < 0.001), and no difference between groups in super added infection (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.19; p = 0.24). Treatment protocol allowing a second dose was the only significant predictor of improved mortality in the meta regression analysis. Certainty of evidence was reduced to moderate for the primary outcome and the secondary outcome of clinical deterioration, while it was reduced to low for the secondary outcome of super added infection. Conclusion: Moderate certainty of evidence suggest no statistically significant improvement of 28-30 day all cause mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with TCZ, although there may be clinically important value. Moderate certainty of evidence suggest lowered relative risk of a composite outcome of death or clinical deterioration, while, low grade evidence indicate no increase in the risk of super added infection associated with TCZ treatment. A protocol allowing two doses of TCZ shows evidence of improved mortality as compared to a strictly single dose protocol.
托珠单抗对COVID-19住院患者的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
自2019年底出现首例COVID - 19病毒性肺炎病例以来,多项研究评估了不同治疗方式的益处。在大流行早期,鉴于与COVID - 19感染相关的细胞因子释放综合征,考虑使用白细胞介素6 (IL - 6)受体抗体Tocilizumab。一些早期观察性研究显示Tocilizumab治疗对死亡率有有益影响,然而,精心设计的随机临床试验(RCT)的结果却与之矛盾。目的:对使用Tocilizumab治疗COVID - 19肺炎的随机对照试验进行系统的文献回顾和荟萃分析,以院内死亡率为主要目标,次要目标包括死亡率、插管或ICU入院的综合结果,另一个次要结果是超附加感染。方法:采用随机效应模型(DerSimonian和Laird)相对危险度(RR)模型,并附有相应的主要结局和次要结局的95%置信区间、p值和森林图。对主要结局进行固定效应敏感性试验,并根据预先确定的标准进行亚组和meta回归分析。结果:死亡率的主要结局显示,托珠单抗降低死亡率的统计学意义不显著(RR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8 ~ 1.01;P = 0.09),尽管有明显的临床益处。次要综合结局的RR显著降低(RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76 ~ 0.9;p < 0.001),超附加感染组间无差异(RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.51 ~ 1.19;P = 0.24)。在meta回归分析中,允许第二次剂量的治疗方案是改善死亡率的唯一显著预测因子。对于主要结局和临床恶化的次要结局,证据的确定性降至中等,而对于超附加感染的次要结局,证据的确定性降至低。结论:中度确定性证据提示,采用TCZ治疗的COVID-19住院患者28-30天全因死亡率无统计学意义,但可能具有重要的临床价值。中度确定性证据表明,死亡或临床恶化等复合结局的相对风险降低,而低级别证据表明,与TCZ治疗相关的超附加感染风险没有增加。有证据表明,与严格的单剂量方案相比,允许两剂TCZ的方案可改善死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信