The Rise of Consensual Containment: From ‘Contactless Control’ to ‘Contactless Responsibility’ for Forced Migration Flows

Violeta Moreno-Lax, Mariagiulia Giuffré
{"title":"The Rise of Consensual Containment: From ‘Contactless Control’ to ‘Contactless Responsibility’ for Forced Migration Flows","authors":"Violeta Moreno-Lax, Mariagiulia Giuffré","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3009331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter centres on the rise and reinforcement of the 'containment paradigm' of refugee flows in developed countries, particularly in Europe. It traces the emergence of new forms of trans-national cooperation with neighbouring States, especially Libya and Turkey, for the 'management' (if not deterrence) of unwanted fluxes of forced migrants (typically impeding access to asylum), taking the form of training, financing, and other capacity-building activities. The key argument put forward is that, despite the absence of direct contact with the persons concerned by EU Member States, the ILC Articles on State Responsibility contemplate instances of contribution to wrongful conduct that may nonetheless trigger their international responsibility. The provisions on complicity, direction and control, and independent responsibility are explored in detail, taking account of the specific role that 'knowledge' plays in that regard, following developments in the case law on the ECHR. The ultimate goal is to demonstrate the continued relevance of international protection obligations and the persistence of responsibility in relation to this new generation of 'contactless', yet effective, means of control.","PeriodicalId":81320,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown immigration law journal","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown immigration law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3009331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This chapter centres on the rise and reinforcement of the 'containment paradigm' of refugee flows in developed countries, particularly in Europe. It traces the emergence of new forms of trans-national cooperation with neighbouring States, especially Libya and Turkey, for the 'management' (if not deterrence) of unwanted fluxes of forced migrants (typically impeding access to asylum), taking the form of training, financing, and other capacity-building activities. The key argument put forward is that, despite the absence of direct contact with the persons concerned by EU Member States, the ILC Articles on State Responsibility contemplate instances of contribution to wrongful conduct that may nonetheless trigger their international responsibility. The provisions on complicity, direction and control, and independent responsibility are explored in detail, taking account of the specific role that 'knowledge' plays in that regard, following developments in the case law on the ECHR. The ultimate goal is to demonstrate the continued relevance of international protection obligations and the persistence of responsibility in relation to this new generation of 'contactless', yet effective, means of control.
自愿遏制的兴起:从强制移民流动的“非接触控制”到“非接触责任”
本章的重点是发达国家,特别是欧洲,难民潮的“遏制范式”的兴起和加强。报告指出,出现了与邻国,特别是利比亚和土耳其的新形式的跨国合作,以"管理"(如果不是威慑的话)不受欢迎的被迫移徙者的流动(通常妨碍获得庇护),采取培训、筹资和其他能力建设活动的形式。提出的关键论点是,尽管欧盟成员国没有与有关人员直接接触,但国际法委员会关于国家责任的条款规定了助长不法行为的事例,尽管如此,这些行为仍可能引发其国际责任。根据欧洲人权公约判例法的发展,考虑到“知识”在这方面所起的具体作用,详细探讨了关于共谋、指导和控制以及独立责任的规定。最终目标是证明与新一代“非接触式”但有效的控制手段有关的国际保护义务和责任的持续相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信