A comparison of the musical scales of the ancient Chinese bronze bell ensemble and the modern bamboo flute.

Yu‐An Rao, E. Carterette, Yu‐Kui Wu
{"title":"A comparison of the musical scales of the ancient Chinese bronze bell ensemble and the modern bamboo flute.","authors":"Yu‐An Rao, E. Carterette, Yu‐Kui Wu","doi":"10.1121/1.2024437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compare over a two-octave range the tonal, interval, and scale relationships of an ancient Chinese bell ensemble of the Zhou Dynasty and a modern bamboo flute. By using subjective pitches, a tonal system with simple harmonic partials (the flute) could be compared with a tonal system with complex inharmonic partials (the bell). We argue that the underlying musical scales of the bell ensemble and the flute are closely related and lie between an unequal-interval pure-system scale and the just-intonation scale. There is some evidence that a least interval of 60 or 66 cents figures in the flute scale, that both flute and bell scales include a 90-cent interval and a true (1,200-cent) octave, and that neither scale includes a 100-cent interval. Since there is a true octave, the scales cannot be cycles of fifths, and since there is no equal-temperament half-tone (100 cents), the scales cannot be equal in temperament. We conclude that the flute and Zhou bell scales are very similar if not the same. Apparently, strong cultural traditions and human perceptual constancies united to sustain a common flexible musical scale during 2,400 years.","PeriodicalId":19838,"journal":{"name":"Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"67 1","pages":"547-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2024437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We compare over a two-octave range the tonal, interval, and scale relationships of an ancient Chinese bell ensemble of the Zhou Dynasty and a modern bamboo flute. By using subjective pitches, a tonal system with simple harmonic partials (the flute) could be compared with a tonal system with complex inharmonic partials (the bell). We argue that the underlying musical scales of the bell ensemble and the flute are closely related and lie between an unequal-interval pure-system scale and the just-intonation scale. There is some evidence that a least interval of 60 or 66 cents figures in the flute scale, that both flute and bell scales include a 90-cent interval and a true (1,200-cent) octave, and that neither scale includes a 100-cent interval. Since there is a true octave, the scales cannot be cycles of fifths, and since there is no equal-temperament half-tone (100 cents), the scales cannot be equal in temperament. We conclude that the flute and Zhou bell scales are very similar if not the same. Apparently, strong cultural traditions and human perceptual constancies united to sustain a common flexible musical scale during 2,400 years.
中国古代铜钟合奏与现代竹笛音阶之比较。
我们在两个八度的范围内比较了中国古代周代钟合奏和现代竹笛的音调、音程和音阶关系。通过使用主观音高,可以将具有简单谐波分音(长笛)的音调系统与具有复杂非谐波分音(钟)的音调系统进行比较。我们认为,钟合奏和长笛的基础音阶是密切相关的,处于不等音程的纯系统音阶和刚音阶之间。有证据表明,长笛音阶中至少有60或66美分的音程,长笛音阶和钟音阶都包括90美分的音程和一个真正的八度音程(1200美分),而且两个音阶都不包括100美分的音程。因为有一个真正的八度,音阶不可能是五度的循环,因为没有等律半音(100分),音阶在气质上不可能是相等的。我们得出的结论是,长笛和周钟的音阶即使不相同,也非常相似。显然,强大的文化传统和人类感知的变化结合在一起,在2400年的时间里维持了一个共同的灵活的音乐音阶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信