The Effect of Oral Care with Miswak Versus Chlorhexidine on the Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Clinical Trial Study

haniye irani, G. Sargazi, Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh, Z. P. Mofrad
{"title":"The Effect of Oral Care with Miswak Versus Chlorhexidine on the Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: A Clinical Trial Study","authors":"haniye irani, G. Sargazi, Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh, Z. P. Mofrad","doi":"10.5812/msnj.100387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inadequate oral care in ICU patients can lead to lethal complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of oral care using miswak and chlorhexidine mouthwash on the incidence of VAP in ICU patients. Methods: This single-blind randomized clinical trial was carried out in 2018 on 70 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care units of Khatam-al-Anbia Hospital in Zahedan, Iran. The inclusion criteria were the insertion of endotracheal tube, scoring 10 or below based on Beck oral assessment scale (BOAS), scoring below 5 based on the modified clinical pulmonary infection score (MCPIS) at the beginning of the study, absence of chronic pulmonary disease, and no history of pulmonary aspiration. The subjects were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into the intervention (n: 35) and control (n: 35) groups. For five days, oral care was administered using miswak in the intervention group and chlorhexidine mouthwash in the control group. Data were collected through a demographic and clinical information questionnaire, MCPIS, and BOAS. After normality tests, the obtained data were analyzed in SPSS 22 using independent t-test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test at the significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The two groups were similar in terms of age, gender, cause of hospitalization, level of consciousness, administered antibiotics, history of ICU admission, and smoking. After oral care with miswak, none of the patients in the intervention group developed VAP, but 6 patients in the control group (17.1%) were diagnosed with this condition. The results of Fisher’s exact test showed a significant difference between the two groups in terms of VAP incidence (P = 0.01). Conclusions: In addition to promoting the oral health of ICU patients, miswak can mitigate the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Therefore, because of its availability, cost-effectiveness, and fewer side effects compared to chlorhexidine mouthwash, it is strongly recommended to be administered to ICU patients.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj.100387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Inadequate oral care in ICU patients can lead to lethal complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of oral care using miswak and chlorhexidine mouthwash on the incidence of VAP in ICU patients. Methods: This single-blind randomized clinical trial was carried out in 2018 on 70 patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the intensive care units of Khatam-al-Anbia Hospital in Zahedan, Iran. The inclusion criteria were the insertion of endotracheal tube, scoring 10 or below based on Beck oral assessment scale (BOAS), scoring below 5 based on the modified clinical pulmonary infection score (MCPIS) at the beginning of the study, absence of chronic pulmonary disease, and no history of pulmonary aspiration. The subjects were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into the intervention (n: 35) and control (n: 35) groups. For five days, oral care was administered using miswak in the intervention group and chlorhexidine mouthwash in the control group. Data were collected through a demographic and clinical information questionnaire, MCPIS, and BOAS. After normality tests, the obtained data were analyzed in SPSS 22 using independent t-test, chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test at the significance level of P < 0.05. Results: The two groups were similar in terms of age, gender, cause of hospitalization, level of consciousness, administered antibiotics, history of ICU admission, and smoking. After oral care with miswak, none of the patients in the intervention group developed VAP, but 6 patients in the control group (17.1%) were diagnosed with this condition. The results of Fisher’s exact test showed a significant difference between the two groups in terms of VAP incidence (P = 0.01). Conclusions: In addition to promoting the oral health of ICU patients, miswak can mitigate the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Therefore, because of its availability, cost-effectiveness, and fewer side effects compared to chlorhexidine mouthwash, it is strongly recommended to be administered to ICU patients.
米斯瓦克与氯己定口腔护理对呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率的影响:一项临床试验研究
背景:ICU患者口腔护理不足可导致致命并发症,如呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)。目的:本研究的目的是比较miswak漱口水和氯己定漱口水口腔护理对ICU患者VAP发生率的影响。方法:2018年对伊朗扎黑丹Khatam-al-Anbia医院重症监护室70例机械通气患者进行单盲随机临床试验。纳入标准为气管内插管,Beck口腔评估量表(BOAS)评分在10分及以下,研究开始时改良临床肺部感染评分(MCPIS)评分在5分以下,无慢性肺部疾病,无肺误吸史。采用方便抽样法选取受试者,随机分为干预组(n: 35)和对照组(n: 35)。干预组给予口腔护理5天,对照组给予洗必泰漱口水。通过人口统计和临床信息问卷、MCPIS和BOAS收集数据。经正态性检验后,在SPSS 22中使用独立t检验、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验进行分析,P < 0.05为显著性水平。结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、住院原因、意识水平、抗生素使用情况、ICU住院史、吸烟情况等方面相似。干预组患者经miswak口腔护理后,无一例发生VAP,而对照组有6例(17.1%)发生VAP。Fisher精确检验结果显示两组VAP发生率差异有统计学意义(P = 0.01)。结论:miswak除能促进ICU患者口腔健康外,还能降低呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率。因此,与氯己定漱口水相比,由于其可获得性、成本效益和较少的副作用,强烈推荐用于ICU患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信