Evaluation of the correlation between end-tidal arterial carbon dioxide pressure based on mainstream capnography technique and arterial carbon dioxide pressure based on arterial blood gas analysis before and after cardiopulmonary bypass pump in children with non-cyanotic congenital heart defects

Ashkan Taghizadeh, Hooman Naghashian, Rojin Faroughi, Behrang Nooralishahi
{"title":"Evaluation of the correlation between end-tidal arterial carbon dioxide pressure based on mainstream capnography technique and arterial carbon dioxide pressure based on arterial blood gas analysis before and after cardiopulmonary bypass pump in children with non-cyanotic congenital heart defects","authors":"Ashkan Taghizadeh, Hooman Naghashian, Rojin Faroughi, Behrang Nooralishahi","doi":"10.34172/mj.2022.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. It is still a matter of debate whether the evaluation of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) using a capnography device allows the evaluation of non-invasive monitoring of arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2). The aim of this study was to compare the value of ETCO2 by direct mainstream and PaCO2 based on arterial gas analysis (ABG) before and after cardiopulmonary bypass pump in children with congenital heart defects. Methods. Twenty nine children who were candidates for elective cardiac surgery and were admitted to the Children's Medical Center were enrolled. Before and after cardiopulmonary bypass pump, ETCO2 was evaluated based on mainstream technique and PaCO2 based on arterial gas analysis. Results. The mean difference between ETCO2 and PaCO2 values before cardiopulmonary bypass pump was 3/68 ± 5/32 mm Hg, which considering that the difference of less than 5 mm Hg is clinically negligible, indicates an acceptable agreement between them. However, the mean difference between the two indices after cardiopulmonary bypass pump was 7/0 ± 6/85 mm Hg that accordingly, the difference between the two measured values after cardiopulmonary bypass will be clinically significant. Conclusion. Preoperative ETCO2 evaluation can provide a close prediction of PaCO2 levels, but after pumping, direct arterial sampling should be taken to accurately measure PaCO2 levels in non-cyanotic patients undergoing heart surgery. Practical Implications. When confronting with a child with non-cyanotic heart defect undergoing surgery, we suggest relying on capnography as a mirror of arterial blood pressure of carbon dioxide. However, capnography may not be as reliable during early post-bypass period in this group of patients and repeated arterial blood samples may be necessary.","PeriodicalId":18474,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Health Services","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and Health Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/mj.2022.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. It is still a matter of debate whether the evaluation of end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) using a capnography device allows the evaluation of non-invasive monitoring of arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2). The aim of this study was to compare the value of ETCO2 by direct mainstream and PaCO2 based on arterial gas analysis (ABG) before and after cardiopulmonary bypass pump in children with congenital heart defects. Methods. Twenty nine children who were candidates for elective cardiac surgery and were admitted to the Children's Medical Center were enrolled. Before and after cardiopulmonary bypass pump, ETCO2 was evaluated based on mainstream technique and PaCO2 based on arterial gas analysis. Results. The mean difference between ETCO2 and PaCO2 values before cardiopulmonary bypass pump was 3/68 ± 5/32 mm Hg, which considering that the difference of less than 5 mm Hg is clinically negligible, indicates an acceptable agreement between them. However, the mean difference between the two indices after cardiopulmonary bypass pump was 7/0 ± 6/85 mm Hg that accordingly, the difference between the two measured values after cardiopulmonary bypass will be clinically significant. Conclusion. Preoperative ETCO2 evaluation can provide a close prediction of PaCO2 levels, but after pumping, direct arterial sampling should be taken to accurately measure PaCO2 levels in non-cyanotic patients undergoing heart surgery. Practical Implications. When confronting with a child with non-cyanotic heart defect undergoing surgery, we suggest relying on capnography as a mirror of arterial blood pressure of carbon dioxide. However, capnography may not be as reliable during early post-bypass period in this group of patients and repeated arterial blood samples may be necessary.
非紫绀型先天性心脏缺陷儿童体外循环泵前后动脉血气分析与基于主流血流造影技术的潮末动脉二氧化碳压的相关性评价
背景。使用血管造影设备评估终潮二氧化碳(ETCO2)是否允许评估动脉二氧化碳压力(PaCO2)的无创监测仍然是一个争论的问题。本研究的目的是比较先天性心脏缺陷患儿体外循环泵前后直接主流ETCO2与基于动脉气体分析(ABG)的PaCO2的价值。方法。29名在儿童医疗中心接受择期心脏手术的儿童被纳入研究。体外循环泵前后,采用主流技术评价ETCO2,采用动脉气体分析评价PaCO2。结果。体外循环泵送前ETCO2与PaCO2值的平均差异为3/68±5/32 mm Hg,考虑到小于5 mm Hg的差异在临床上可以忽略不计,两者之间的一致性是可以接受的。但体外循环泵后两项指标的平均差值为7/0±6/85 mm Hg,因此体外循环后两项测量值的差异具有临床意义。结论。术前ETCO2评估可以较好地预测PaCO2水平,但非青紫心脏手术患者在泵送后,需直接动脉采样才能准确测量PaCO2水平。实际意义。当面对接受手术的非紫绀型心脏缺陷的儿童时,我们建议依靠血管造影作为动脉二氧化碳血压的镜子。然而,在这组患者旁路手术后早期,血管造影可能不那么可靠,可能需要重复的动脉血液样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信