Up for a challenge? Digital practices of 24-hour news channels

Q2 Social Sciences
K. Chobanyan
{"title":"Up for a challenge? Digital practices of 24-hour news channels","authors":"K. Chobanyan","doi":"10.30547/worldofmedia.3.2020.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nearly 35 years ago 24-hour global news channels proved to be the fast, efficient and popular way of news production and delivery. They re-defined television news and used to sell this product successfully until the spawn of digital era. However, today younger audience prefers to get their news mainly from digital sources. 24-hour news channels are facing the tough challenge, having to conquer the new ways of packaging and delivering the news. This study uses quantitative content analysis to explore the different practices some of the biggest global news channels are using on YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram. The findings suggest that TV news powerhouses are abandoning video as their main specialty on digital platforms and mostly use traditional production formats to create the digital news product. We also come to conclusion that each platform is being used for different purposes: YouTube offers mainly the same content viewers would find on traditional TV; Facebook mainly drives traffic to the company web-site; and Instagram so far is the platform lacking clear content strategy, used for strengthening the brand rather than distributing news. The quality of some video materials offered by 24-hour news channels often does not meet conventional professional standards.","PeriodicalId":36142,"journal":{"name":"World of Media","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World of Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.3.2020.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nearly 35 years ago 24-hour global news channels proved to be the fast, efficient and popular way of news production and delivery. They re-defined television news and used to sell this product successfully until the spawn of digital era. However, today younger audience prefers to get their news mainly from digital sources. 24-hour news channels are facing the tough challenge, having to conquer the new ways of packaging and delivering the news. This study uses quantitative content analysis to explore the different practices some of the biggest global news channels are using on YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram. The findings suggest that TV news powerhouses are abandoning video as their main specialty on digital platforms and mostly use traditional production formats to create the digital news product. We also come to conclusion that each platform is being used for different purposes: YouTube offers mainly the same content viewers would find on traditional TV; Facebook mainly drives traffic to the company web-site; and Instagram so far is the platform lacking clear content strategy, used for strengthening the brand rather than distributing news. The quality of some video materials offered by 24-hour news channels often does not meet conventional professional standards.
准备好接受挑战了吗?24小时新闻频道的数字化实践
近35年前,24小时全球新闻频道被证明是快速、高效和受欢迎的新闻生产和传播方式。他们重新定义了电视新闻,并成功地销售了这一产品,直到数字时代的萌芽。然而,今天的年轻观众更喜欢主要从数字来源获取新闻。24小时新闻频道正面临着严峻的挑战,必须征服新的包装和传递新闻的方式。本研究使用定量内容分析来探索一些最大的全球新闻频道在YouTube、Facebook和Instagram上使用的不同做法。调查结果表明,电视新闻巨头正在放弃视频作为其在数字平台上的主要专长,而大多使用传统的制作格式来制作数字新闻产品。我们还得出结论,每个平台都有不同的用途:YouTube主要提供与传统电视相同的内容;Facebook主要为公司网站带来流量;到目前为止,Instagram是一个缺乏明确内容战略的平台,用于加强品牌而不是传播新闻。24小时新闻频道提供的一些视频材料的质量往往达不到传统的专业标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World of Media
World of Media Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信