Event cognition (not ecumenical naturalism) integrates individual and cultural differences

IF 3.6 3区哲学 0 RELIGION

Religion Brain & Behavior Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/2153599X.2021.1987306

Ann Taves

{"title":"Event cognition (not ecumenical naturalism) integrates individual and cultural differences","authors":"Ann Taves","doi":"10.1080/2153599X.2021.1987306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"org/10.31234/osf.io/ksfvq. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 Quintana, D. S. (2015). From pre-registration to publication: A non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549 Reddish, P., Tok, P., & Kundt, R. (2016). Religious cognition and behaviour in autism: The role of mentalizing. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.1003518 Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1088868314568811 Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi. org/10.1177/0956797611417632 Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2018). False-positive citations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617698146 van Elk, M., Matzke, D., Gronau, Q. F., Guana, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: A skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01365 van Os, J., Linscott, R. J., Myin-Germeys, I., Delespaul, P., & Krabbendam, L. (2009). A systematic review and metaanalysis of the psychosis continuum: Evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder. Psychological Medicine, 39(02), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708003814 Watanabe, S., & Laurent, S. M. (2021). Past its prime? A methodological overview and critique of religious priming research in social psychology. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 6(1-2), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1558/ jcsr.38411","PeriodicalId":45959,"journal":{"name":"Religion Brain & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion Brain & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.1987306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

org/10.31234/osf.io/ksfvq. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 Quintana, D. S. (2015). From pre-registration to publication: A non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549 Reddish, P., Tok, P., & Kundt, R. (2016). Religious cognition and behaviour in autism: The role of mentalizing. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.1003518 Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1088868314568811 Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi. org/10.1177/0956797611417632 Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2018). False-positive citations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617698146 van Elk, M., Matzke, D., Gronau, Q. F., Guana, M., Vandekerckhove, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: A skeptical perspective on religious priming. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01365 van Os, J., Linscott, R. J., Myin-Germeys, I., Delespaul, P., & Krabbendam, L. (2009). A systematic review and metaanalysis of the psychosis continuum: Evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder. Psychological Medicine, 39(02), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708003814 Watanabe, S., & Laurent, S. M. (2021). Past its prime? A methodological overview and critique of religious priming research in social psychology. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 6(1-2), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1558/ jcsr.38411

查看原文本刊更多论文

事件认知(不是普世的自然主义)整合了个体和文化差异

org/10.31234/osf.io/ksfvq。开放科学合作。（2015）．估计心理科学的可重复性。科学通报，349(6251)，aac4716。https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 Quintana, d.s.(2015)。从预注册到发表:进行综合相关数据的元分析的非技术入门。心理学前缘，6,1-9。https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549 Reddish, P.， Tok, P.， & Kundt, R.(2016)。自闭症的宗教认知与行为:心理化的作用。国际宗教心理学杂志，26(2)，95-112。https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2014.1003518 Shariff, a.f, Willard, a.k, Andersen, T， & Norenzayan, A.(2016)。宗教启动:一个关注亲社会性的元分析。人格与社会心理学通报，20(1)，27-48。https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1088868314568811 Simmons, J. P, Nelson, L. D， & simmonsohn, U.(2011)。假阳性心理学:在数据收集和分析方面的未披露的灵活性允许将任何事情呈现为重要的。心理科学，22(11)，1359-1366。https://doi。(2018). simmonsohn, j.p, Nelson, l.d.， and Simonsohn U.。假阳性的引用。心理科学透视，13(2)，255-259。https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617698146 van Elk, M, Matzke, D, Gronau, Q. F, Guana, M, Vandekerckhove, J， & Wagenmakers, E. J(2015)。荟萃分析不能代替已登记的重复实验:对宗教启动的怀疑观点。心理学前沿，6,1-7。https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01365 van Os, J, Linscott, R. J, Myin-Germeys, I.， Delespaul, P.， & Krabbendam, L.(2009)。精神病连续体的系统回顾和荟萃分析:精神障碍的精神病倾向-持续-损害模型的证据。心理医学，39(02)，179-195。https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708003814 Watanabe, S.， & Laurent, S. M.(2021)。过了黄金时期?社会心理学中宗教启动研究的方法论综述与批判。宗教认知科学学报，6(1-2)，31-55。https://doi.org/10.1558/ jcsr.38411

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Religion Brain & Behavior RELIGION-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

13.60%

发文量