Effect of Early Nursing Intervention under Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography and Magnetic Resonance Images on Brain Injury in Premature Infants

IF 0.4 4区化学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A Pub Date : 2023-05-15 DOI:10.1155/2023/5800106

Aiyan Liu, Huan Zhang, W. Guo

{"title":"Effect of Early Nursing Intervention under Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography and Magnetic Resonance Images on Brain Injury in Premature Infants","authors":"Aiyan Liu, Huan Zhang, W. Guo","doi":"10.1155/2023/5800106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the effects of early nursing intervention on brain injury among premature infants, 100 premature infants diagnosed with brain injury were included in the research and randomly divided into the control group (50 cases) and the experimental group (50 cases). The patients in the two groups were performed with the same conventional comprehensive treatment. The patients in the control group received conventional nursing while those in the experimental group underwent early nursing intervention. During follow-up, neurodevelopment, motor behavior, the incidence rate of brain injury, and nursing satisfaction of the infants in the two groups were compared. It was demonstrated that the five neurodevelopment scores of the experimental group were all higher than those of the control group. The differences showed statistical significance (\n \n P\n <\n 0.05\n \n ). The total effective rate of motor development of the experimental group reached 94%, while that of the control group amounted to 80%. Obviously, the total effective rate of motor development of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group. The difference was statistically significant (\n \n P\n <\n 0.05\n \n ). The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group reached 98%, which was apparently higher than that of the control group (74%). The difference suggested statistical significance (\n \n P\n <\n 0.05\n \n ). The rates of brain injury at 1 and 2 years after the birth of the experimental group were 6% and 2%, respectively. The rates of brain injury at 1 and 2 years after the birth of the control group amounted to 18% and 14%, respectively. The rates of brain injury at 1 and 2 years after the birth of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group. The difference revealed statistical significance (\n \n P\n <\n 0.05\n \n ). Hence, the early nursing intervention of premature infants with brain injury could promote brain development, improve neurological function, reduce the incidence of brain injury, and achieve an ideal nursing effect.","PeriodicalId":55216,"journal":{"name":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5800106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the effects of early nursing intervention on brain injury among premature infants, 100 premature infants diagnosed with brain injury were included in the research and randomly divided into the control group (50 cases) and the experimental group (50 cases). The patients in the two groups were performed with the same conventional comprehensive treatment. The patients in the control group received conventional nursing while those in the experimental group underwent early nursing intervention. During follow-up, neurodevelopment, motor behavior, the incidence rate of brain injury, and nursing satisfaction of the infants in the two groups were compared. It was demonstrated that the five neurodevelopment scores of the experimental group were all higher than those of the control group. The differences showed statistical significance ( P < 0.05 ). The total effective rate of motor development of the experimental group reached 94%, while that of the control group amounted to 80%. Obviously, the total effective rate of motor development of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group. The difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). The nursing satisfaction of the experimental group reached 98%, which was apparently higher than that of the control group (74%). The difference suggested statistical significance ( P < 0.05 ). The rates of brain injury at 1 and 2 years after the birth of the experimental group were 6% and 2%, respectively. The rates of brain injury at 1 and 2 years after the birth of the control group amounted to 18% and 14%, respectively. The rates of brain injury at 1 and 2 years after the birth of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group. The difference revealed statistical significance ( P < 0.05 ). Hence, the early nursing intervention of premature infants with brain injury could promote brain development, improve neurological function, reduce the incidence of brain injury, and achieve an ideal nursing effect.

查看原文本刊更多论文

波幅综合脑电图和磁共振成像下早期护理干预对早产儿脑损伤的影响

为探讨早期护理干预对早产儿脑损伤的影响，将100例诊断为脑损伤的早产儿随机分为对照组(50例)和实验组(50例)。两组患者均采用相同的常规综合治疗。对照组患者给予常规护理，实验组患者给予早期护理干预。随访期间比较两组患儿的神经发育、运动行为、脑损伤发生率及护理满意度。结果表明，实验组的5项神经发育评分均高于对照组。差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。实验组运动发育总有效率达94%，对照组达80%。显然，实验组的运动发展总有效率高于对照组。差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。实验组护理满意度达98%，明显高于对照组(74%)。差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。实验组出生后1年和2年脑损伤发生率分别为6%和2%。对照组出生后1年和2年脑损伤发生率分别为18%和14%。实验组出生后1、2年脑损伤发生率均低于对照组。差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。因此，对脑损伤早产儿进行早期护理干预，可以促进脑发育，改善神经功能，降低脑损伤发生率，达到理想的护理效果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A 物理-光谱学

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part A brings together clinicians, chemists, and physicists involved in the application of magnetic resonance techniques. The journal welcomes contributions predominantly from the fields of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), but also encourages submissions relating to less common magnetic resonance imaging and analytical methods. Contributors come from academic, governmental, and clinical communities, to disseminate the latest important experimental results from medical, non-medical, and analytical magnetic resonance methods, as well as related computational and theoretical advances. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): -Fundamental advances in the understanding of magnetic resonance -Experimental results from magnetic resonance imaging (including MRI and its specialized applications) -Experimental results from magnetic resonance spectroscopy (including NMR, EPR, and their specialized applications) -Computational and theoretical support and prediction for experimental results -Focused reviews providing commentary and discussion on recent results and developments in topical areas of investigation -Reviews of magnetic resonance approaches with a tutorial or educational approach