{"title":"PROFESSIONAL PREFERENCES OF SPEECH PATHOLOGIST FOR THE ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF DYSPHAGIA AFTER STROKE","authors":"Jannat Haider, Rabia Zubair","doi":"10.52567/trj.v6i02.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dysphagia is common after stroke, leading to adverse outcome. The clinical decisions are often based on usual practice, however no formal or similar methods exists to determine the efficacy for assessment and treatment of dysphagia after stroke. Objective:To determine professional preferences among SLPs in terms of opted techniques and approaches for the assessment and management of dysphagia in major cities of Pakistan. Methods:Study design was cross sectional survey and data was collected from practicing speech language pathologists of Rawalpindi, Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi from July 2020 till January 2021through online medium on Google forms. The non-probability convenient sampling technique was used for data collection from speech language pathologists. Sample size was n=31 out of which n=20 were females and n=11 were males. Responses of all participants were presented in the form of n(%) through SPSS version 20. Results: There was variation between all the responses of participants from different cities of Pakistan. The Speech and language pathologists (SLPs)had access to instrumental assessment video fluoroscopy n=5 (16.1%), FEES n= 4 (12.9%) and more than one instrumental assessment tools n= 8 (25.7%) but before recommendation of exercise is rarelyn=20 (64.3%) practiced. The two principal outcome measures for direct dysphagia exercises indicated by SLPs were Oral control n=12 (35.2%) and reduced aspiration n=8 (12.9%). To measure direct exercises outcomes SLPs rarely n=25 (80.7%) uses instrumental assessment tools but use rating scales n=29 (93%). SLPs also prefer to see patient for management of dysphagia 1-2 times a day, 1-4 days a week, for 45 minutes. The most frequently preferred direct exercises are lip range movement n=15 (48.4%), lip strength n=16 (51.6%) and effortful swallow n= 16 (51.6%) whereas electrical stimulation method is least practiced n=5 (16.2%). Conclusion: The Speech language pathologists showed variability in preferences for assessments and management practices and format. Keywords:Dysphagia, clinical decision making, speech-language pathology, stroke.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52567/trj.v6i02.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Dysphagia is common after stroke, leading to adverse outcome. The clinical decisions are often based on usual practice, however no formal or similar methods exists to determine the efficacy for assessment and treatment of dysphagia after stroke. Objective:To determine professional preferences among SLPs in terms of opted techniques and approaches for the assessment and management of dysphagia in major cities of Pakistan. Methods:Study design was cross sectional survey and data was collected from practicing speech language pathologists of Rawalpindi, Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi from July 2020 till January 2021through online medium on Google forms. The non-probability convenient sampling technique was used for data collection from speech language pathologists. Sample size was n=31 out of which n=20 were females and n=11 were males. Responses of all participants were presented in the form of n(%) through SPSS version 20. Results: There was variation between all the responses of participants from different cities of Pakistan. The Speech and language pathologists (SLPs)had access to instrumental assessment video fluoroscopy n=5 (16.1%), FEES n= 4 (12.9%) and more than one instrumental assessment tools n= 8 (25.7%) but before recommendation of exercise is rarelyn=20 (64.3%) practiced. The two principal outcome measures for direct dysphagia exercises indicated by SLPs were Oral control n=12 (35.2%) and reduced aspiration n=8 (12.9%). To measure direct exercises outcomes SLPs rarely n=25 (80.7%) uses instrumental assessment tools but use rating scales n=29 (93%). SLPs also prefer to see patient for management of dysphagia 1-2 times a day, 1-4 days a week, for 45 minutes. The most frequently preferred direct exercises are lip range movement n=15 (48.4%), lip strength n=16 (51.6%) and effortful swallow n= 16 (51.6%) whereas electrical stimulation method is least practiced n=5 (16.2%). Conclusion: The Speech language pathologists showed variability in preferences for assessments and management practices and format. Keywords:Dysphagia, clinical decision making, speech-language pathology, stroke.
背景:吞咽困难是卒中后常见的,可导致不良后果。临床决策通常基于通常的实践,然而没有正式的或类似的方法来确定卒中后吞咽困难的评估和治疗效果。目的:了解巴基斯坦主要城市的吞咽困难评估和管理的技术和方法,以确定slp的专业偏好。方法:采用横断面调查的研究设计,通过谷歌表格的在线媒体收集2020年7月至2021年1月期间拉瓦尔品第、伊斯兰堡、拉合尔和卡拉奇的执业语音语言病理学家的数据。采用非概率方便抽样技术对语音语言病理学家进行数据采集。样本量为n=31,其中女性20人,男性11人。所有参与者的回答通过SPSS version 20以n(%)的形式表示。结果:来自巴基斯坦不同城市的参与者的所有回答都存在差异。语音和语言病理学家(slp)使用仪器评估视频透视检查n=5(16.1%),费用n= 4(12.9%)和超过一种仪器评估工具n= 8(25.7%),但在建议锻炼之前很少有20(64.3%)进行练习。slp指示的直接吞咽困难运动的两个主要结局指标是口服控制n=12(35.2%)和减少误吸n=8(12.9%)。为了测量直接锻炼结果,slp很少(n=25)(80.7%)使用工具性评估工具,而是使用评分量表(n=29)(93%)。slp也倾向于每天1-2次,每周1-4天,每次45分钟,治疗吞咽困难。最常用的直接练习是唇范围运动n=15(48.4%)、唇力量n=16(51.6%)和用力吞咽n=16(51.6%),而电刺激法的使用次数最少(n=5)(16.2%)。结论:语音语言病理学家在评估和管理实践和格式方面表现出不同的偏好。关键词:吞咽困难,临床决策,言语病理,脑卒中。