The Sussex Campus ‘Forever Strike’: Estrangement, Resistance and Utopian Temporality

Heather McKnight
{"title":"The Sussex Campus ‘Forever Strike’: Estrangement, Resistance and Utopian Temporality","authors":"Heather McKnight","doi":"10.18193/SAH.V5I1.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2018 strike undertaken by academics working in the UK was the largest called in University and College Union history, lasting for fourteen days over 4 weeks, with 88% of members voting for strike action across 64 universities. [1] This article explores how the campus at the University of Sussex during the time of this strike became a strange, conflicted and transformative space; both a heterotopia and a site for a critical utopian process, where norms can be bent and broken, where people can function outside of the normal rules and disciplinary technologies of contemporary academia. [2] The picket lines were supplemented by strike supporting events, teach-ins, teach-outs, occupations, marches, workshops and socials; linking it with debates on the public university, decolonizing the curriculum.  The strike action reached beyond the pensions debate and demonstrated radical utopian potential.  The article considers how moments of estrangement are created in the learning space of the picket, whose strangeness and otherness, in comparison to a class room , allowed participants to open up to new ideas. [3] Estrangement enforces a reduction of hierarchy and creation of community essential to establishing what Giroux might view as a critical pedagogy that tries to resist modes of cultural reproduction. [4] This actively changes how time is experienced on campus: slowing down, allowing for contemplation, opening up different experiences of the ‘Now’. Ultimately this article considers how the struggle is far from over either off or on campus.   On Sussex campus, the strike songs are still heard on Library square, meetings are ongoing, the UCU and student groups are taking forward their manifesto for change, while beyond Sussex, there has been disruption to established democratic processes at both the National Union of Students National Conference and the UCU Congress this year.  Strike action has contributed to a process of revealing new potentials both within, and beyond the campus. [1] “UCU Announces 14 Strike Dates at 61 Universities in Pensions Row.” [2] Foucault, “Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias, ‘Des Espace Autres.’” 2 [3] Bloch, Halley, and Suvin, “Entfremdung, Verfremdung.” [4] Giroux, On Critical Pedagogy . 5 - 6","PeriodicalId":31069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Arts and Humanities","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Arts and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18193/SAH.V5I1.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The 2018 strike undertaken by academics working in the UK was the largest called in University and College Union history, lasting for fourteen days over 4 weeks, with 88% of members voting for strike action across 64 universities. [1] This article explores how the campus at the University of Sussex during the time of this strike became a strange, conflicted and transformative space; both a heterotopia and a site for a critical utopian process, where norms can be bent and broken, where people can function outside of the normal rules and disciplinary technologies of contemporary academia. [2] The picket lines were supplemented by strike supporting events, teach-ins, teach-outs, occupations, marches, workshops and socials; linking it with debates on the public university, decolonizing the curriculum.  The strike action reached beyond the pensions debate and demonstrated radical utopian potential.  The article considers how moments of estrangement are created in the learning space of the picket, whose strangeness and otherness, in comparison to a class room , allowed participants to open up to new ideas. [3] Estrangement enforces a reduction of hierarchy and creation of community essential to establishing what Giroux might view as a critical pedagogy that tries to resist modes of cultural reproduction. [4] This actively changes how time is experienced on campus: slowing down, allowing for contemplation, opening up different experiences of the ‘Now’. Ultimately this article considers how the struggle is far from over either off or on campus.   On Sussex campus, the strike songs are still heard on Library square, meetings are ongoing, the UCU and student groups are taking forward their manifesto for change, while beyond Sussex, there has been disruption to established democratic processes at both the National Union of Students National Conference and the UCU Congress this year.  Strike action has contributed to a process of revealing new potentials both within, and beyond the campus. [1] “UCU Announces 14 Strike Dates at 61 Universities in Pensions Row.” [2] Foucault, “Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias, ‘Des Espace Autres.’” 2 [3] Bloch, Halley, and Suvin, “Entfremdung, Verfremdung.” [4] Giroux, On Critical Pedagogy . 5 - 6
苏塞克斯校园“永远的罢工”:隔阂、抵抗和乌托邦的时间性
2018年在英国工作的学者发起的罢工是大学和学院联盟历史上规模最大的罢工,持续了14天,持续了4周,在64所大学中,88%的成员投票支持罢工行动。[1]这篇文章探讨了在这次罢工期间,苏塞克斯大学的校园是如何成为一个奇怪、冲突和变革的空间的;既是一个异托邦,也是一个批判乌托邦过程的场所,在这里,规范可以被弯曲和打破,人们可以在当代学术界的正常规则和学科技术之外运作。[2]纠察线的补充是罢工支持活动、宣讲、宣讲、占领、游行、研讨会和社交活动;将其与关于公立大学的辩论联系起来,去殖民化课程。罢工行动超出了养老金辩论的范围,显示出激进的乌托邦潜力。文章考虑了在纠察员的学习空间中如何产生隔阂的时刻,与教室相比,纠察员的陌生感和他者性使参与者能够接受新思想。[3]异化强化了等级制度的减少和社区的创造,这对于建立吉鲁可能认为的试图抵制文化再生产模式的批判性教育学至关重要。[4]这积极地改变了在校园里体验时间的方式:放慢脚步,允许沉思,开启不同的“现在”体验。最后,这篇文章认为,无论是在校外还是在校内,这场斗争都远未结束。在苏塞克斯的校园里,图书馆广场上仍然可以听到罢工的歌声,会议正在进行中,UCU和学生团体正在推进他们的变革宣言,而在苏塞克斯之外,在今年的全国学生联盟全国会议和UCU大会上,已经建立的民主进程都受到了破坏。罢工行动有助于揭示校园内外的新潜力。[1]“UCU宣布61所大学的14个罢工日期。[2]傅柯:《论他者空间:乌托邦与异托邦》,《空间》。[3]布洛赫、哈雷和苏文:《彻底彻底》。[4]吉鲁:《批判教育学》。5 - 6
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信