Recombinant Factor VII for the Conservative Management Trials of Intractable Postpartum Haemorrhage: Is it a Drug Effect, Operator Experience or Inherent Result of the Aetiology

Tarek El Azizi, Doaa Alaa Eldin
{"title":"Recombinant Factor VII for the Conservative Management Trials of Intractable Postpartum Haemorrhage: Is it a Drug Effect, Operator Experience or Inherent Result of the Aetiology","authors":"Tarek El Azizi, Doaa Alaa Eldin","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2022.128004.1174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This monocentric retrospective study aimed at the evaluation of outcome of the parturients with intractable postpartum haemorrhage (P.P.H.) after the administration of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) to preserve the uterus. Materials and Methods : this is a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary hospital . 41 patients were selected based on the inclusion criteria of both suffering from postpartum hemorrhage and received recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Patients were divided into group A who were managed by senior staff and group B who had started their management by junior staff and senior staff was called later for the case. Data was retrieved from patients’ records during 2019. All patients had a preliminary evaluation and classic management measures for postpartum hemorrhage either in the emergency department or during planned cesarean section. If are still bleeding, patients were infused with rFVIIa. If the uterine bleeding didn't stop, conservative management was cancelled, and abdominal hysterectomy was done. In all cases, postpartum mortality was determined. Results: The study included 41 parturient with P.P.H. with a mean age of 30.8±5.4 years. Eighteen patients had a cesarean section (C.S.), of whom 8 had successfully conserved the uterus, and 10 patients had a lifesaving hysterectomy using rFVIIa. On the other hand, 23 patients had been complicated with intractable postpartum haemorrhage. Twenty patients successfully had conservative management after using rFVIIa, and 3 patients had failed conservative management after using rFVIIa, and hysterectomy was lifesaving. Regarding 7-day postpartum mortality, one patient died with an intractable haemorrhage with delayed hysterectomy. Conclusion: The operator seniority and experience is more important than the use of rFVIIa to achieve conservative management of cases suffering from or at great risk of postpartum hemorrhage and to reduce patients mortality.","PeriodicalId":12080,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Women's Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2022.128004.1174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This monocentric retrospective study aimed at the evaluation of outcome of the parturients with intractable postpartum haemorrhage (P.P.H.) after the administration of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) to preserve the uterus. Materials and Methods : this is a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary hospital . 41 patients were selected based on the inclusion criteria of both suffering from postpartum hemorrhage and received recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). Patients were divided into group A who were managed by senior staff and group B who had started their management by junior staff and senior staff was called later for the case. Data was retrieved from patients’ records during 2019. All patients had a preliminary evaluation and classic management measures for postpartum hemorrhage either in the emergency department or during planned cesarean section. If are still bleeding, patients were infused with rFVIIa. If the uterine bleeding didn't stop, conservative management was cancelled, and abdominal hysterectomy was done. In all cases, postpartum mortality was determined. Results: The study included 41 parturient with P.P.H. with a mean age of 30.8±5.4 years. Eighteen patients had a cesarean section (C.S.), of whom 8 had successfully conserved the uterus, and 10 patients had a lifesaving hysterectomy using rFVIIa. On the other hand, 23 patients had been complicated with intractable postpartum haemorrhage. Twenty patients successfully had conservative management after using rFVIIa, and 3 patients had failed conservative management after using rFVIIa, and hysterectomy was lifesaving. Regarding 7-day postpartum mortality, one patient died with an intractable haemorrhage with delayed hysterectomy. Conclusion: The operator seniority and experience is more important than the use of rFVIIa to achieve conservative management of cases suffering from or at great risk of postpartum hemorrhage and to reduce patients mortality.
重组因子VII在难治性产后出血保守治疗试验中的应用:是药物作用、操作人员经验还是病因的固有结果
目的:本单中心回顾性研究旨在评价顽固性产后出血(P.P.H.)患者应用重组活化因子VII (rFVIIa)保子宫后的预后。材料与方法:本研究是在某三级医院进行的回顾性研究。根据同时存在产后出血和接受重组活化因子(rFVIIa)治疗的纳入标准,选择41例患者。患者分为A组由高级医护人员管理,B组由初级医护人员开始管理,高级医护人员稍后接诊。数据是从2019年的患者记录中检索的。所有患者在急诊科或计划剖宫产时均有产后出血的初步评估和经典处理措施。如果仍在出血,则向患者输注rFVIIa。若子宫出血仍未停止,则取消保守治疗,行腹部子宫切除术。在所有病例中,都确定了产后死亡率。结果:本组共41例妊高征产妇,平均年龄30.8±5.4岁。18例患者行剖宫产术(C.S.),其中8例成功保存子宫,10例患者使用rFVIIa进行了挽救生命的子宫切除术。另一方面,23例患者合并难治性产后出血。20例术后保守治疗成功,3例术后保守治疗失败,子宫切除术挽救了患者的生命。关于产后7天死亡率,1例患者死于难治性出血并延迟子宫切除术。结论:手术人员的资历和经验比使用rFVIIa更能实现对产后出血或产后出血高危患者的保守治疗,降低患者死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信