Systematic review of high-dose amikacin regimens for the treatment of Gram-negative infections based on EUCAST dosing recommendations

K. J. Frost, R. Hamilton, S. Hughes, C. Jamieson, P. Rafferty, O. Troise, A. Jenkins
{"title":"Systematic review of high-dose amikacin regimens for the treatment of Gram-negative infections based on EUCAST dosing recommendations","authors":"K. J. Frost, R. Hamilton, S. Hughes, C. Jamieson, P. Rafferty, O. Troise, A. Jenkins","doi":"10.1101/2022.05.22.22275426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Updated European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) amikacin breakpoints for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa included revised dosing recommendations of 25–30 mg/kg to achieve key pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, higher than recommended in the British National Formulary. The objectives of this review were to identify clinical evidence for high-dose amikacin regimens and to determine drug exposures that are related to adverse events and toxicity. Methods The literature search was conducted in October 2021 and updated in May 2022 using electronic databases for any study reporting adult participants treated with amikacin at doses ≥20 mg/kg/day. Reference lists of included papers were also screened for potential papers. Data were extracted for pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcomes, presented in a summary table and consolidated narratively. Meta-analysis was not possible. Each study was assessed for bias before, during and after the intervention using the ROBINS-I tool. Results Nine studies (total 501 participants in 10 reports) were identified and included, eight of which were observational studies. Assessment of bias showed substantial flaws. Dosing regimens ranged from 25 to 30 mg/kg/day. Six studies adjusted the dose in obesity when participants had a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2. Target peak serum concentrations ranged from 60 mg/L to 80 mg/L and 59.6–81.8% of patients achieved these targets, but there was no information on clinical outcomes. Two studies reported the impact of high-dose amikacin on renal function. No studies reporting auditory or vestibular toxicity were identified. Conclusion All included papers were limited by a significant risk of bias, while methodological and reporting heterogeneity made drawing conclusions challenging. Lack of information on the impact on renal function or ototoxicity means high-dose regimens should be used cautiously in older people. There is a need for a consensus guideline for high-dose amikacin to be written. Trial registration number PROSPERO (CRD42021250022).","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.22.22275426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Updated European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) amikacin breakpoints for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa included revised dosing recommendations of 25–30 mg/kg to achieve key pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters, higher than recommended in the British National Formulary. The objectives of this review were to identify clinical evidence for high-dose amikacin regimens and to determine drug exposures that are related to adverse events and toxicity. Methods The literature search was conducted in October 2021 and updated in May 2022 using electronic databases for any study reporting adult participants treated with amikacin at doses ≥20 mg/kg/day. Reference lists of included papers were also screened for potential papers. Data were extracted for pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcomes, presented in a summary table and consolidated narratively. Meta-analysis was not possible. Each study was assessed for bias before, during and after the intervention using the ROBINS-I tool. Results Nine studies (total 501 participants in 10 reports) were identified and included, eight of which were observational studies. Assessment of bias showed substantial flaws. Dosing regimens ranged from 25 to 30 mg/kg/day. Six studies adjusted the dose in obesity when participants had a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2. Target peak serum concentrations ranged from 60 mg/L to 80 mg/L and 59.6–81.8% of patients achieved these targets, but there was no information on clinical outcomes. Two studies reported the impact of high-dose amikacin on renal function. No studies reporting auditory or vestibular toxicity were identified. Conclusion All included papers were limited by a significant risk of bias, while methodological and reporting heterogeneity made drawing conclusions challenging. Lack of information on the impact on renal function or ototoxicity means high-dose regimens should be used cautiously in older people. There is a need for a consensus guideline for high-dose amikacin to be written. Trial registration number PROSPERO (CRD42021250022).
基于EUCAST剂量建议对治疗革兰氏阴性感染的大剂量阿米卡星方案进行系统评价
最新的欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)对肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的阿米卡星临界点进行了修订,建议剂量为25-30 mg/kg,以达到关键的药代动力学/药效学参数,高于英国国家处方集的推荐剂量。本综述的目的是确定高剂量阿米卡星方案的临床证据,并确定与不良事件和毒性相关的药物暴露。方法于2021年10月进行文献检索,并于2022年5月使用电子数据库更新所有报告阿米卡星剂量≥20mg /kg/天的成人受试者的研究。还筛选了纳入论文的参考文献清单,以寻找潜在的论文。提取药代动力学参数和临床结果的数据,以汇总表的形式呈现,并以叙述方式进行整合。meta分析是不可能的。使用ROBINS-I工具在干预之前、期间和之后评估每项研究的偏倚。结果纳入9项研究(10篇报道共501名受试者),其中8项为观察性研究。对偏倚的评估显示出实质性的缺陷。给药方案为25 - 30mg /kg/天。当参与者的体重指数≥30kg /m2时,有6项研究调整了肥胖的剂量。目标峰值血清浓度范围为60mg /L至80mg /L, 59.6-81.8%的患者达到了这些目标,但没有关于临床结果的信息。两项研究报道了大剂量阿米卡星对肾功能的影响。没有报告听觉或前庭毒性的研究被确认。所有纳入的论文都受到显著偏倚风险的限制,而方法和报告的异质性使得得出结论具有挑战性。由于缺乏对肾功能或耳毒性影响的信息,因此在老年人中应谨慎使用高剂量方案。有必要就大剂量阿米卡星制定一致的指南。试验注册号PROSPERO (CRD42021250022)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信