Patients’ awareness of the mental health tribunal and capacity to make requests

Nuwan Galappathie, R. Harsh, Mathew Thomas, A. Begum, D. Kelly
{"title":"Patients’ awareness of the mental health tribunal and capacity to make requests","authors":"Nuwan Galappathie, R. Harsh, Mathew Thomas, A. Begum, D. Kelly","doi":"10.1192/PB.BP.113.042945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims and method To evaluate patient awareness of the mental health tribunal and identify any association between capacity to request a tribunal and frequency of completed hearings. A cohort of detained patients within a secure hospital were assessed and data for past tribunals evaluated by presence of capacity and mode of application.\n\nResults Of the 65 patients evaluated, 78% were aware of the tribunal’s power to discharge, 14% were aware of its power to recommend leave and 4% were aware of its power to recommend transfer; 12% lacked capacity to request a tribunal. Patients with capacity received more completed hearings per year than those without, both overall (0.58 v . 0.29 per year, P = 0.04) and by patient application (0.45 v . 0.12 per year, P = 0.03).\n\nClinical implications Hospital managers should ensure that all detained patients have regular assessments of their capacity to request a tribunal and that those who lack capacity are referred to the Secretary of State when it is considered that a tribunal would be in their best interests. Hospital managers should consider referring such cases to the Secretary of State every 12 months.","PeriodicalId":89639,"journal":{"name":"The psychiatrist","volume":"51 1","pages":"363-366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The psychiatrist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.BP.113.042945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aims and method To evaluate patient awareness of the mental health tribunal and identify any association between capacity to request a tribunal and frequency of completed hearings. A cohort of detained patients within a secure hospital were assessed and data for past tribunals evaluated by presence of capacity and mode of application. Results Of the 65 patients evaluated, 78% were aware of the tribunal’s power to discharge, 14% were aware of its power to recommend leave and 4% were aware of its power to recommend transfer; 12% lacked capacity to request a tribunal. Patients with capacity received more completed hearings per year than those without, both overall (0.58 v . 0.29 per year, P = 0.04) and by patient application (0.45 v . 0.12 per year, P = 0.03). Clinical implications Hospital managers should ensure that all detained patients have regular assessments of their capacity to request a tribunal and that those who lack capacity are referred to the Secretary of State when it is considered that a tribunal would be in their best interests. Hospital managers should consider referring such cases to the Secretary of State every 12 months.
患者对精神卫生法庭的认识和提出要求的能力
目的和方法评估患者对精神卫生法庭的认识,并确定请求法庭的能力与完成听证会的频率之间的联系。对一所安全医院内一批被拘留的病人进行了评估,并对过去法庭的数据进行了评估,以评估其是否具备能力和适用方式。结果受访的65例患者中,78%的患者知道仲裁庭有权出院,14%的患者知道其有权建议休假,4%的患者知道其有权建议转院;12%的人没有向法庭提出请求的能力。有能力的患者比没有能力的患者每年完成的听证会次数更多,两者总体上(0.58 v。0.29 v /年,P = 0.04)和患者应用(0.45 v /年)。每年0.12,P = 0.03)。临床影响医院管理人员应确保定期评估所有被拘留的病人请求法庭的能力,并在认为法庭将符合其最大利益时,将没有能力的病人转交给国务大臣。医院管理人员应考虑每12个月将此类病例提交给国务大臣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信